Modro poslovanje=varno in uspešno poslovanjehttps://www.modro-poslovanje.si:443/Sporočila/rss/522RSS document<![CDATA[CELEX:62025TJ0042_INF:           Arrêt du Tribunal (première chambre) du 1er juillet 2026.#DecoTrend GmbH contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle.#Dessin ou modèle de l’Union européenne – Procédure de nullité – Dessin ou modèle de l’Union européenne enregistré représentant un abat-jour – Motif de nullité – Non-respect des conditions de protection ‑ Article 25, paragraphe 1, sous b), du règlement (CE) no 6/2002 – Absence de caractère individuel – Article 6 du règlement no 6/2002 – Examen d’office des faits – Article 63, paragraphe 1, du règlement no 6/2002.#Affaire T-42/25.]]>https://www.modro-poslovanje.si/Sporočila/celex62025tj0042-inf-arrêt-du-tribunal-première-chambre-du-1er-juillet-2026decotrend-gmbh-contre-office-de-lunion-européenne-pour-la-propriété-intellectuelledessin-ou-modèle-de-lunion-européenne-procédure-de-nullité-dessin-ou-modèle-de-lunion-européenne-enregistré-représentant-un-abat-jour-motif-de-nullité-non-respect-des-conditions-de-protection-article-25-paragraphe-1-sous-b-du-règlement-ce-no-62002-absence-de-caractère-individuel-article-6-du-règlement-no-62002-examen-doffice-des-faits-article-63-paragraphe-1-du-règlement-no-62002affaire-t-4225Fri, 31 Jul 2026 12:05:45 GMThttps://www.modro-poslovanje.si/Sporočila/celex62025tj0042-inf-arrêt-du-tribunal-première-chambre-du-1er-juillet-2026decotrend-gmbh-contre-office-de-lunion-européenne-pour-la-propriété-intellectuelledessin-ou-modèle-de-lunion-européenne-procédure-de-nullité-dessin-ou-modèle-de-lunion-européenne-enregistré-représentant-un-abat-jour-motif-de-nullité-non-respect-des-conditions-de-protection-article-25-paragraphe-1-sous-b-du-règlement-ce-no-62002-absence-de-caractère-individuel-article-6-du-règlement-no-62002-examen-doffice-des-faits-article-63-paragraphe-1-du-règlement-no-62002affaire-t-4225<![CDATA[CELEX:62025TO0671_INF:           Ordonnance du Tribunal (cinquième chambre) du 11 mai 2026.#TNG Stadtnetz GmbH contre Commission européenne.#Recours en annulation – Aides d’État – Fonds publics pour le développement de réseaux à haut débit – Plainte – Examen préliminaire d’une prétendue aide d’État illégale – Lettre d’information – Article 24, paragraphe 2, du règlement (UE) 2015/1589 – Acte préparatoire – Acte non susceptible de recours – Irrecevabilité.#Affaire T-671/25.]]>https://www.modro-poslovanje.si/Sporočila/celex62025to0671-inf-ordonnance-du-tribunal-cinquième-chambre-du-11-mai-2026tng-stadtnetz-gmbh-contre-commission-européennerecours-en-annulation-aides-détat-fonds-publics-pour-le-développement-de-réseaux-à-haut-débit-plainte-examen-préliminaire-dune-prétendue-aide-détat-illégale-lettre-dinformation-article-24-paragraphe-2-du-règlement-ue-20151589-acte-préparatoire-acte-non-susceptible-de-recours-irrecevabilitéaffaire-t-67125Fri, 31 Jul 2026 12:05:45 GMThttps://www.modro-poslovanje.si/Sporočila/celex62025to0671-inf-ordonnance-du-tribunal-cinquième-chambre-du-11-mai-2026tng-stadtnetz-gmbh-contre-commission-européennerecours-en-annulation-aides-détat-fonds-publics-pour-le-développement-de-réseaux-à-haut-débit-plainte-examen-préliminaire-dune-prétendue-aide-détat-illégale-lettre-dinformation-article-24-paragraphe-2-du-règlement-ue-20151589-acte-préparatoire-acte-non-susceptible-de-recours-irrecevabilitéaffaire-t-67125<![CDATA[CELEX:62025TJ0412_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 17 June 2026.#Parkster AB v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark PARKNER – Earlier EU word mark PARKSTER – Earlier national figurative mark Parkster – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Similarity of the goods and services – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-412/25.]]>https://www.modro-poslovanje.si/Sporočila/celex62025tj0412-inf-judgment-of-the-general-court-eighth-chamber-of-17-june-2026parkster-ab-v-european-union-intellectual-property-officeeu-trade-mark-opposition-proceedings-application-for-the-eu-word-mark-parkner-earlier-eu-word-mark-parkster-earlier-national-figurative-mark-parkster-relative-ground-for-refusal-likelihood-of-confusion-similarity-of-the-goods-and-services-article-81b-of-regulation-eu-20171001case-t-41225Fri, 31 Jul 2026 12:05:45 GMThttps://www.modro-poslovanje.si/Sporočila/celex62025tj0412-inf-judgment-of-the-general-court-eighth-chamber-of-17-june-2026parkster-ab-v-european-union-intellectual-property-officeeu-trade-mark-opposition-proceedings-application-for-the-eu-word-mark-parkner-earlier-eu-word-mark-parkster-earlier-national-figurative-mark-parkster-relative-ground-for-refusal-likelihood-of-confusion-similarity-of-the-goods-and-services-article-81b-of-regulation-eu-20171001case-t-41225<![CDATA[CELEX:62025TO0732_INF: Order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 5 May 2026.#Skechers USA, Inc. II v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU word mark SLIP-INS – Absolute grounds for refusal – Descriptive character – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-732/25.]]>https://www.modro-poslovanje.si/Sporočila/celex62025to0732-inf-order-of-the-general-court-fifth-chamber-of-5-may-2026skechers-usa-inc-ii-v-european-union-intellectual-property-officeeu-trade-mark-application-for-eu-word-mark-slip-ins-absolute-grounds-for-refusal-descriptive-character-no-distinctive-character-article-71b-and-c-of-regulation-eu-20171001-action-manifestly-lacking-any-foundation-in-lawcase-t-73225Fri, 31 Jul 2026 12:05:45 GMThttps://www.modro-poslovanje.si/Sporočila/celex62025to0732-inf-order-of-the-general-court-fifth-chamber-of-5-may-2026skechers-usa-inc-ii-v-european-union-intellectual-property-officeeu-trade-mark-application-for-eu-word-mark-slip-ins-absolute-grounds-for-refusal-descriptive-character-no-distinctive-character-article-71b-and-c-of-regulation-eu-20171001-action-manifestly-lacking-any-foundation-in-lawcase-t-73225<![CDATA[CELEX:62025TJ0267_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 3 June 2026.#Osculati Srl v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark O – Earlier EU figurative mark O – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Facts or evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Article 95(2) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-267/25.]]>https://www.modro-poslovanje.si/Sporočila/celex62025tj0267-inf-judgment-of-the-general-court-eighth-chamber-of-3-june-2026osculati-srl-v-european-union-intellectual-property-officeeu-trade-mark-opposition-proceedings-international-registration-designating-the-european-union-figurative-mark-o-earlier-eu-figurative-mark-o-relative-ground-for-refusal-likelihood-of-confusion-article-81b-of-regulation-eu-20171001-facts-or-evidence-submitted-for-the-first-time-before-the-board-of-appeal-article-952-of-regulation-20171001case-t-26725Fri, 31 Jul 2026 12:05:45 GMThttps://www.modro-poslovanje.si/Sporočila/celex62025tj0267-inf-judgment-of-the-general-court-eighth-chamber-of-3-june-2026osculati-srl-v-european-union-intellectual-property-officeeu-trade-mark-opposition-proceedings-international-registration-designating-the-european-union-figurative-mark-o-earlier-eu-figurative-mark-o-relative-ground-for-refusal-likelihood-of-confusion-article-81b-of-regulation-eu-20171001-facts-or-evidence-submitted-for-the-first-time-before-the-board-of-appeal-article-952-of-regulation-20171001case-t-26725<![CDATA[CELEX:62024TO0313(01)_INF: Order of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 12 January 2026.#XH v European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – Promotion – 2023 promotion exercise – Decision not to promote the applicant to grade AD 8 – Article 45(1) of the Staff Regulations – No act open to challenge – Liability – Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-313/24.]]>https://www.modro-poslovanje.si/Sporočila/celex62024to031301-inf-order-of-the-general-court-tenth-chamber-of-12-january-2026xh-v-european-commissioncivil-service-officials-promotion-2023-promotion-exercise-decision-not-to-promote-the-applicant-to-grade-ad-8-article-451-of-the-staff-regulations-no-act-open-to-challenge-liability-action-in-part-manifestly-inadmissible-and-in-part-lacking-any-foundation-in-lawcase-t-31324Fri, 31 Jul 2026 12:05:45 GMThttps://www.modro-poslovanje.si/Sporočila/celex62024to031301-inf-order-of-the-general-court-tenth-chamber-of-12-january-2026xh-v-european-commissioncivil-service-officials-promotion-2023-promotion-exercise-decision-not-to-promote-the-applicant-to-grade-ad-8-article-451-of-the-staff-regulations-no-act-open-to-challenge-liability-action-in-part-manifestly-inadmissible-and-in-part-lacking-any-foundation-in-lawcase-t-31324<![CDATA[CELEX:62024TJ0433_INF: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 25 February 2026.#Edward William Batchelor v European Commission.#Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Regulation (EU) 2022/1925 – Documents relating to designation as a gatekeeper – Refusal of access – Obligation to state reasons – Exception relating to the protection of court proceedings – Exception relating to the protection of the purpose of inspections, investigations and audits – Overriding public interest – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-433/24.]]>https://www.modro-poslovanje.si/Sporočila/celex62024tj0433-inf-judgment-of-the-general-court-first-chamber-of-25-february-2026edward-william-batchelor-v-european-commissionaccess-to-documents-regulation-ec-no-10492001-regulation-eu-20221925-documents-relating-to-designation-as-a-gatekeeper-refusal-of-access-obligation-to-state-reasons-exception-relating-to-the-protection-of-court-proceedings-exception-relating-to-the-protection-of-the-purpose-of-inspections-investigations-and-audits-overriding-public-interest-obligation-to-state-reasonscase-t-43324Fri, 31 Jul 2026 12:05:45 GMThttps://www.modro-poslovanje.si/Sporočila/celex62024tj0433-inf-judgment-of-the-general-court-first-chamber-of-25-february-2026edward-william-batchelor-v-european-commissionaccess-to-documents-regulation-ec-no-10492001-regulation-eu-20221925-documents-relating-to-designation-as-a-gatekeeper-refusal-of-access-obligation-to-state-reasons-exception-relating-to-the-protection-of-court-proceedings-exception-relating-to-the-protection-of-the-purpose-of-inspections-investigations-and-audits-overriding-public-interest-obligation-to-state-reasonscase-t-43324<![CDATA[CELEX:62025TO0784(02)_INF: Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 25 March 2026.#Tiemo Wölken v European Commission.#Case T-784/25.]]>https://www.modro-poslovanje.si/Sporočila/celex62025to078402-inf-order-of-the-general-court-sixth-chamber-of-25-march-2026tiemo-wölken-v-european-commissioncase-t-78425Fri, 31 Jul 2026 12:05:45 GMThttps://www.modro-poslovanje.si/Sporočila/celex62025to078402-inf-order-of-the-general-court-sixth-chamber-of-25-march-2026tiemo-wölken-v-european-commissioncase-t-78425<![CDATA[CELEX:62025TJ0350_INF: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 8 July 2026.#Aguirre y Compañía, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark BLUE PADEL – Earlier EU figurative marks BULLPADEL – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Interdependence between factors – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-350/25.]]>https://www.modro-poslovanje.si/Sporočila/celex62025tj0350-inf-judgment-of-the-general-court-first-chamber-of-8-july-2026aguirre-y-compañía-sa-v-european-union-intellectual-property-officeeu-trade-mark-opposition-proceedings-application-for-eu-word-mark-blue-padel-earlier-eu-figurative-marks-bullpadel-relative-ground-for-refusal-likelihood-of-confusion-interdependence-between-factors-article-81b-of-regulation-eu-20171001case-t-35025Fri, 31 Jul 2026 12:05:45 GMThttps://www.modro-poslovanje.si/Sporočila/celex62025tj0350-inf-judgment-of-the-general-court-first-chamber-of-8-july-2026aguirre-y-compañía-sa-v-european-union-intellectual-property-officeeu-trade-mark-opposition-proceedings-application-for-eu-word-mark-blue-padel-earlier-eu-figurative-marks-bullpadel-relative-ground-for-refusal-likelihood-of-confusion-interdependence-between-factors-article-81b-of-regulation-eu-20171001case-t-35025<![CDATA[CELEX:62025TO0839_INF:           Ordonnance du Tribunal (sixième chambre) du 16 juillet 2026.#Team Beverage AG contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle.#Marque de l’Union européenne – Procédure de nullité – Marque de l’Union européenne verbale TEAM – Cause de nullité absolue – Procédure devant la division d’annulation – Recours manifestement dépourvu de tout fondement en droit.#Affaire T-839/25.]]>https://www.modro-poslovanje.si/Sporočila/celex62025to0839-inf-ordonnance-du-tribunal-sixième-chambre-du-16-juillet-2026team-beverage-ag-contre-office-de-lunion-européenne-pour-la-propriété-intellectuellemarque-de-lunion-européenne-procédure-de-nullité-marque-de-lunion-européenne-verbale-team-cause-de-nullité-absolue-procédure-devant-la-division-dannulation-recours-manifestement-dépourvu-de-tout-fondement-en-droitaffaire-t-83925Fri, 31 Jul 2026 12:05:45 GMThttps://www.modro-poslovanje.si/Sporočila/celex62025to0839-inf-ordonnance-du-tribunal-sixième-chambre-du-16-juillet-2026team-beverage-ag-contre-office-de-lunion-européenne-pour-la-propriété-intellectuellemarque-de-lunion-européenne-procédure-de-nullité-marque-de-lunion-européenne-verbale-team-cause-de-nullité-absolue-procédure-devant-la-division-dannulation-recours-manifestement-dépourvu-de-tout-fondement-en-droitaffaire-t-83925