﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!--RSS Genrated: Tue, 23 Jun 2026 13:47:13 GMT--><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:ev="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/event/"><channel><title>Modro poslovanje=varno in uspešno poslovanje - Praksa Sodišča EU (DAVKI)</title><link>https://www.modro-poslovanje.si:443/en-us/BAZA-ZNANJA/rss/category/1285/praksa-sodišča-eu-davki</link><atom:link href="https://www.modro-poslovanje.si:443/en-us/BAZA-ZNANJA/rss/category/1285/praksa-sodišča-eu-davki" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><description>RSS document</description><item><dc:creator><![CDATA[Admin MPS]]></dc:creator><title><![CDATA[CELEX:62025TO0844: Order of the President of the General Court of 22 June 2026.#Biohaven Bioscience Ireland Ltd and Biohaven Therapeutics Ltd v European Medicines Agency.#Interim relief – Medicinal products for human use – Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 – Withdrawal of the application for marketing authorisation for Dazluma – Publication of the assessment report – Application for suspension of operation – Prima facie case – Urgency – Weighing up of interests.#Case T-844/25 R.]]></title><link>https://www.modro-poslovanje.si/en-us/BAZA-ZNANJA/celex62025to0844-order-of-the-president-of-the-general-court-of-22-june-2026biohaven-bioscience-ireland-ltd-and-biohaven-therapeutics-ltd-v-european-medicines-agencyinterim-relief-medicinal-products-for-human-use-regulation-ec-no-7262004-withdrawal-of-the-application-for-marketing-authorisation-for-dazluma-publication-of-the-assessment-report-application-for-suspension-of-operation-prima-facie-case-urgency-weighing-up-of-interestscase-t-84425-r</link><description><![CDATA[]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2026 12:01:50 GMT</pubDate><guid>https://www.modro-poslovanje.si/en-us/BAZA-ZNANJA/celex62025to0844-order-of-the-president-of-the-general-court-of-22-june-2026biohaven-bioscience-ireland-ltd-and-biohaven-therapeutics-ltd-v-european-medicines-agencyinterim-relief-medicinal-products-for-human-use-regulation-ec-no-7262004-withdrawal-of-the-application-for-marketing-authorisation-for-dazluma-publication-of-the-assessment-report-application-for-suspension-of-operation-prima-facie-case-urgency-weighing-up-of-interestscase-t-84425-r</guid><dc:identifier><![CDATA[3d36a592-9ba3-44f3-9fdc-a4e6cedb8355-348074]]></dc:identifier></item><item><dc:creator><![CDATA[Admin MPS]]></dc:creator><title><![CDATA[CELEX:62024CO0860:            Ordonnance de la Cour (huitième chambre) du 11 juin 2026.#HJ contre Ministero dell’Istruzione e del Merito.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Reconnaissance des qualifications professionnelles – Droit d’exercer la profession d’enseignant spécialisé dans le soutien scolaire dans l’État membre d’accueil – Titre de formation émis dans l’État membre d’origine – Titre n’habilitant pas à exercer la profession d’enseignant spécialisé dans le soutien scolaire dans l’État membre d’origine – Reconnaissance dans l’État membre d’accueil.#Affaire C-860/24.]]></title><link>https://www.modro-poslovanje.si/en-us/BAZA-ZNANJA/celex62024co0860-ordonnance-de-la-cour-huitième-chambre-du-11-juin-2026hj-contre-ministero-dellistruzione-e-del-meritorenvoi-préjudiciel-reconnaissance-des-qualifications-professionnelles-droit-dexercer-la-profession-denseignant-spécialisé-dans-le-soutien-scolaire-dans-létat-membre-daccueil-titre-de-formation-émis-dans-létat-membre-dorigine-titre-nhabilitant-pas-à-exercer-la-profession-denseignant-spécialisé-dans-le-soutien-scolaire-dans-létat-membre-dorigine-reconnaissance-dans-létat-membre-daccueilaffaire-c-86024</link><description><![CDATA[This document does not exist in English.]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2026 12:01:47 GMT</pubDate><guid>https://www.modro-poslovanje.si/en-us/BAZA-ZNANJA/celex62024co0860-ordonnance-de-la-cour-huitième-chambre-du-11-juin-2026hj-contre-ministero-dellistruzione-e-del-meritorenvoi-préjudiciel-reconnaissance-des-qualifications-professionnelles-droit-dexercer-la-profession-denseignant-spécialisé-dans-le-soutien-scolaire-dans-létat-membre-daccueil-titre-de-formation-émis-dans-létat-membre-dorigine-titre-nhabilitant-pas-à-exercer-la-profession-denseignant-spécialisé-dans-le-soutien-scolaire-dans-létat-membre-dorigine-reconnaissance-dans-létat-membre-daccueilaffaire-c-86024</guid><dc:identifier><![CDATA[3d36a592-9ba3-44f3-9fdc-a4e6cedb8355-348043]]></dc:identifier></item><item><dc:creator><![CDATA[Admin MPS]]></dc:creator><title><![CDATA[CELEX:62025CO0214:            Ordonnance de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 10 juin 2026.#Your personal driver Soc. coop. contre Roma Capitale.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 53, paragraphe 2, et article 94 du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Exigence de présentation du contexte factuel et réglementaire du litige au principal ainsi que des raisons justifiant la nécessité d’une réponse à la question préjudicielle – Absence de précisions suffisantes – Irrecevabilité manifeste.#Affaire C-214/25.]]></title><link>https://www.modro-poslovanje.si/en-us/BAZA-ZNANJA/celex62025co0214-ordonnance-de-la-cour-sixième-chambre-du-10-juin-2026your-personal-driver-soc-coop-contre-roma-capitalerenvoi-préjudiciel-article-53-paragraphe-2-et-article-94-du-règlement-de-procédure-de-la-cour-exigence-de-présentation-du-contexte-factuel-et-réglementaire-du-litige-au-principal-ainsi-que-des-raisons-justifiant-la-nécessité-dune-réponse-à-la-question-préjudicielle-absence-de-précisions-suffisantes-irrecevabilité-manifesteaffaire-c-21425</link><description><![CDATA[This document does not exist in English.]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2026 12:01:46 GMT</pubDate><guid>https://www.modro-poslovanje.si/en-us/BAZA-ZNANJA/celex62025co0214-ordonnance-de-la-cour-sixième-chambre-du-10-juin-2026your-personal-driver-soc-coop-contre-roma-capitalerenvoi-préjudiciel-article-53-paragraphe-2-et-article-94-du-règlement-de-procédure-de-la-cour-exigence-de-présentation-du-contexte-factuel-et-réglementaire-du-litige-au-principal-ainsi-que-des-raisons-justifiant-la-nécessité-dune-réponse-à-la-question-préjudicielle-absence-de-précisions-suffisantes-irrecevabilité-manifesteaffaire-c-21425</guid><dc:identifier><![CDATA[3d36a592-9ba3-44f3-9fdc-a4e6cedb8355-348031]]></dc:identifier></item><item><dc:creator><![CDATA[Admin MPS]]></dc:creator><title><![CDATA[CELEX:62024CA0418: Case C-418/24, Obadal: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 14 April 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo – Spain) – TJ v Comunidad de Madrid (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Directive 1999/70/EC – Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP – Fixed-term employment contracts in the public sector – Clause 5 – Measures to prevent and penalise the abuse of successive fixed-term employment contracts or relationships – Conversion of successive fixed-term contracts into a contract of indefinite duration – National legislation not permitting such conversion, but laying down other measures to prevent and penalise such abuse – Effective, dissuasive and proportionate penalty measures)]]></title><link>https://www.modro-poslovanje.si/en-us/BAZA-ZNANJA/celex62024ca0418-case-c-41824-obadal-judgment-of-the-court-grand-chamber-of-14april-2026-request-for-a-preliminary-ruling-from-the-tribunal-supremo-spain-tj-v-comunidad-de-madrid-reference-for-a-preliminary-ruling-social-policy-directive199970ec-framework-agreement-on-fixed-term-work-concluded-by-etuc-unice-and-ceep-fixed-term-employment-contracts-in-the-public-sector-clause5-measures-to-prevent-and-penalise-the-abuse-of-successive-fixed-term-employment-contracts-or-relationships-conversion-of-successive-fixed-term-contracts-into-a-contract-of-indefinite-duration-national-legislation-not-permitting-such-conversion-but-laying-down-other-measures-to-prevent-and-penalise-such-abuse-effective-dissuasive-and-proportionate-penalty-measures</link><description><![CDATA[]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2026 22:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>https://www.modro-poslovanje.si/en-us/BAZA-ZNANJA/celex62024ca0418-case-c-41824-obadal-judgment-of-the-court-grand-chamber-of-14april-2026-request-for-a-preliminary-ruling-from-the-tribunal-supremo-spain-tj-v-comunidad-de-madrid-reference-for-a-preliminary-ruling-social-policy-directive199970ec-framework-agreement-on-fixed-term-work-concluded-by-etuc-unice-and-ceep-fixed-term-employment-contracts-in-the-public-sector-clause5-measures-to-prevent-and-penalise-the-abuse-of-successive-fixed-term-employment-contracts-or-relationships-conversion-of-successive-fixed-term-contracts-into-a-contract-of-indefinite-duration-national-legislation-not-permitting-such-conversion-but-laying-down-other-measures-to-prevent-and-penalise-such-abuse-effective-dissuasive-and-proportionate-penalty-measures</guid><dc:identifier><![CDATA[3d36a592-9ba3-44f3-9fdc-a4e6cedb8355-347994]]></dc:identifier></item><item><dc:creator><![CDATA[Admin MPS]]></dc:creator><title><![CDATA[CELEX:62024CA0753: Case C-753/24, Rzepacz: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 April 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie – Poland) – Powszechna Kasa Oszczędności Bank Polski S.A. v MS and MS (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Directive 93/13/EEC – Article 7(1) – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Effects of a term being found to be unfair – Invalidity of the loan agreement – Actions for restitution – Limitation period for the action brought by the seller or supplier – Circumstances that may justify disregarding the expiry of the limitation period – Principle of effectiveness – Principle of legal certainty – Principle of proportionality – Right of access to a court – Unjust enrichment)]]></title><link>https://www.modro-poslovanje.si/en-us/BAZA-ZNANJA/celex62024ca0753-case-c-75324-rzepacz-judgment-of-the-court-ninth-chamber-of-16april-2026-request-for-a-preliminary-ruling-from-the-s%c4%85d-okr%c4%99gowy-w-warszawie-poland-powszechna-kasa-oszcz%c4%99dno%c5%9bci-bank-polski-sa-v-ms-and-ms-reference-for-a-preliminary-ruling-consumer-protection-directive9313eec-article71-unfair-terms-in-consumer-contracts-effects-of-a-term-being-found-to-be-unfair-invalidity-of-the-loan-agreement-actions-for-restitution-limitation-period-for-the-action-brought-by-the-seller-or-supplier-circumstances-that-may-justify-disregarding-the-expiry-of-the-limitation-period-principle-of-effectiveness-principle-of-legal-certainty-principle-of-proportionality-right-of-access-to-a-court-unjust-enrichment</link><description><![CDATA[]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2026 22:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>https://www.modro-poslovanje.si/en-us/BAZA-ZNANJA/celex62024ca0753-case-c-75324-rzepacz-judgment-of-the-court-ninth-chamber-of-16april-2026-request-for-a-preliminary-ruling-from-the-s%c4%85d-okr%c4%99gowy-w-warszawie-poland-powszechna-kasa-oszcz%c4%99dno%c5%9bci-bank-polski-sa-v-ms-and-ms-reference-for-a-preliminary-ruling-consumer-protection-directive9313eec-article71-unfair-terms-in-consumer-contracts-effects-of-a-term-being-found-to-be-unfair-invalidity-of-the-loan-agreement-actions-for-restitution-limitation-period-for-the-action-brought-by-the-seller-or-supplier-circumstances-that-may-justify-disregarding-the-expiry-of-the-limitation-period-principle-of-effectiveness-principle-of-legal-certainty-principle-of-proportionality-right-of-access-to-a-court-unjust-enrichment</guid><dc:identifier><![CDATA[3d36a592-9ba3-44f3-9fdc-a4e6cedb8355-347995]]></dc:identifier></item><item><dc:creator><![CDATA[Admin MPS]]></dc:creator><title><![CDATA[CELEX:62025TA0291: Case T-291/25: Judgment of the General Court of 6 May 2026 – Ecuphar v EUIPO – Société des produits Nestlé (proGlan) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark proGlan – International registration of the earlier word mark PRO PLAN – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)]]></title><link>https://www.modro-poslovanje.si/en-us/BAZA-ZNANJA/celex62025ta0291-case-t-29125-judgment-of-the-general-court-of-6may-2026-ecuphar-v-euipo-société-des-produits-nestlé-proglan-eu-trade-mark-opposition-proceedings-application-for-eu-figurative-mark-proglan-international-registration-of-the-earlier-word-mark-pro-plan-relative-ground-for-refusal-likelihood-of-confusion-article81b-of-regulation-eu20171001</link><description><![CDATA[]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2026 22:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>https://www.modro-poslovanje.si/en-us/BAZA-ZNANJA/celex62025ta0291-case-t-29125-judgment-of-the-general-court-of-6may-2026-ecuphar-v-euipo-société-des-produits-nestlé-proglan-eu-trade-mark-opposition-proceedings-application-for-eu-figurative-mark-proglan-international-registration-of-the-earlier-word-mark-pro-plan-relative-ground-for-refusal-likelihood-of-confusion-article81b-of-regulation-eu20171001</guid><dc:identifier><![CDATA[3d36a592-9ba3-44f3-9fdc-a4e6cedb8355-347996]]></dc:identifier></item><item><dc:creator><![CDATA[Admin MPS]]></dc:creator><title><![CDATA[CELEX:62026CN0196: Case C-196/26, Dreame International: Reference for a preliminary ruling from Court of Appeal of the Unified Patent Court made on 11 March 2026 – Dyson Technology Limited v Dreame International (Hongkong) Limited, Eurep GmbH]]></title><link>https://www.modro-poslovanje.si/en-us/BAZA-ZNANJA/celex62026cn0196-case-c-19626-dreame-international-reference-for-a-preliminary-ruling-from-court-of-appeal-of-the-unified-patent-court-made-on-11march-2026-dyson-technology-limited-v-dreame-international-hongkong-limited-eurep-gmbh</link><description><![CDATA[]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2026 22:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>https://www.modro-poslovanje.si/en-us/BAZA-ZNANJA/celex62026cn0196-case-c-19626-dreame-international-reference-for-a-preliminary-ruling-from-court-of-appeal-of-the-unified-patent-court-made-on-11march-2026-dyson-technology-limited-v-dreame-international-hongkong-limited-eurep-gmbh</guid><dc:identifier><![CDATA[3d36a592-9ba3-44f3-9fdc-a4e6cedb8355-347997]]></dc:identifier></item><item><dc:creator><![CDATA[Admin MPS]]></dc:creator><title><![CDATA[CELEX:62024CA0496: Case C-496/24, Stichting de Thuiskopie: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 16 April 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden – Netherlands) – Stichting Onderhandelingen Thuiskopievergoeding, Stichting de Thuiskopie v HP Nederland BV, Dell BV, Stichting Overlegorgaan Blanco Informatiedragers (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Intellectual property – Copyright and related rights – Directive 2001/29/EC – Article 2 – Reproduction right – Article 3(1) – Right of communication to the public of works – Art. 5(2)(b) – Private copying exception – Fair compensation – Paid streaming service – Offline streaming copy – Article 5(5))]]></title><link>https://www.modro-poslovanje.si/en-us/BAZA-ZNANJA/celex62024ca0496-case-c-49624-stichting-de-thuiskopie-judgment-of-the-court-second-chamber-of-16april-2026-request-for-a-preliminary-ruling-from-the-hoge-raad-der-nederlanden-netherlands-stichting-onderhandelingen-thuiskopievergoeding-stichting-de-thuiskopie-v-hp-nederland-bv-dell-bv-stichting-overlegorgaan-blanco-informatiedragers-reference-for-a-preliminary-ruling-approximation-of-laws-intellectual-property-copyright-and-related-rights-directive200129ec-article2-reproduction-right-article31-right-of-communication-to-the-public-of-works-art52b-private-copying-exception-fair-compensation-paid-streaming-service-offline-streaming-copy-article55</link><description><![CDATA[]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2026 22:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>https://www.modro-poslovanje.si/en-us/BAZA-ZNANJA/celex62024ca0496-case-c-49624-stichting-de-thuiskopie-judgment-of-the-court-second-chamber-of-16april-2026-request-for-a-preliminary-ruling-from-the-hoge-raad-der-nederlanden-netherlands-stichting-onderhandelingen-thuiskopievergoeding-stichting-de-thuiskopie-v-hp-nederland-bv-dell-bv-stichting-overlegorgaan-blanco-informatiedragers-reference-for-a-preliminary-ruling-approximation-of-laws-intellectual-property-copyright-and-related-rights-directive200129ec-article2-reproduction-right-article31-right-of-communication-to-the-public-of-works-art52b-private-copying-exception-fair-compensation-paid-streaming-service-offline-streaming-copy-article55</guid><dc:identifier><![CDATA[3d36a592-9ba3-44f3-9fdc-a4e6cedb8355-347998]]></dc:identifier></item><item><dc:creator><![CDATA[Admin MPS]]></dc:creator><title><![CDATA[CELEX:62023CA0549: Case C-549/23, American Express Europe and Others: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 16 April 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the College van Beroep voor het bedrijfsleven – Netherlands) – American Express Europe SA, American Express Carte France SA, Visa Europe Ltd, Mastercard Europe SA, Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV v Autoriteit Consument en Markt (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Payment services in the internal market – Regulation (EU) 2015/751 – Article 2(10) – Interchange fees for card-based payment transactions – Article 2(11) – Net compensation – Article 4 – Cap on the amount of those fees – Article 5 – Prohibition of circumvention – Remuneration received by a co-branding partner from a three party payment card scheme – Applicatio]]></title><link>https://www.modro-poslovanje.si/en-us/BAZA-ZNANJA/celex62023ca0549-case-c-54923-american-express-europe-and-others-judgment-of-the-court-second-chamber-of-16april-2026-request-for-a-preliminary-ruling-from-the-college-van-beroep-voor-het-bedrijfsleven-netherlands-american-express-europe-sa-american-express-carte-france-sa-visa-europe-ltd-mastercard-europe-sa-koninklijke-luchtvaart-maatschappij-nv-v-autoriteit-consument-en-markt-reference-for-a-preliminary-ruling-payment-services-in-the-internal-market-regulation-eu2015751-article210-interchange-fees-for-card-based-payment-transactions-article211-net-compensation-article4-cap-on-the-amount-of-those-fees-article5-prohibition-of-circumvention-remuneration-received-by-a-co-branding-partner-from-a-three-party-payment-card-scheme-application-of-that-cap-to-that</link><description><![CDATA[]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2026 22:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>https://www.modro-poslovanje.si/en-us/BAZA-ZNANJA/celex62023ca0549-case-c-54923-american-express-europe-and-others-judgment-of-the-court-second-chamber-of-16april-2026-request-for-a-preliminary-ruling-from-the-college-van-beroep-voor-het-bedrijfsleven-netherlands-american-express-europe-sa-american-express-carte-france-sa-visa-europe-ltd-mastercard-europe-sa-koninklijke-luchtvaart-maatschappij-nv-v-autoriteit-consument-en-markt-reference-for-a-preliminary-ruling-payment-services-in-the-internal-market-regulation-eu2015751-article210-interchange-fees-for-card-based-payment-transactions-article211-net-compensation-article4-cap-on-the-amount-of-those-fees-article5-prohibition-of-circumvention-remuneration-received-by-a-co-branding-partner-from-a-three-party-payment-card-scheme-application-of-that-cap-to-that</guid><dc:identifier><![CDATA[3d36a592-9ba3-44f3-9fdc-a4e6cedb8355-347999]]></dc:identifier></item><item><dc:creator><![CDATA[Admin MPS]]></dc:creator><title><![CDATA[CELEX:62024TA0229: Case T-229/24: Judgment of the General Court of 29 April 2026 – Sánchez v Commission (Civil service – Officials – Recruitment – Notice of competition – Open competition EPSO/AD/391/21 – Decision not to place the applicant’s name on the reserve list – Equal treatment – Normalisation of marks – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Principle of good administration – Duration of the administrative procedure – Reasonable period of time)]]></title><link>https://www.modro-poslovanje.si/en-us/BAZA-ZNANJA/celex62024ta0229-case-t-22924-judgment-of-the-general-court-of-29april-2026-sánchez-v-commission-civil-service-officials-recruitment-notice-of-competition-open-competitionepsoad39121-decision-not-to-place-the-applicants-name-on-the-reserve-list-equal-treatment-normalisation-of-marks-obligation-to-state-reasons-rights-of-the-defence-principle-of-good-administration-duration-of-the-administrative-procedure-reasonable-period-of-time</link><description><![CDATA[]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2026 22:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>https://www.modro-poslovanje.si/en-us/BAZA-ZNANJA/celex62024ta0229-case-t-22924-judgment-of-the-general-court-of-29april-2026-sánchez-v-commission-civil-service-officials-recruitment-notice-of-competition-open-competitionepsoad39121-decision-not-to-place-the-applicants-name-on-the-reserve-list-equal-treatment-normalisation-of-marks-obligation-to-state-reasons-rights-of-the-defence-principle-of-good-administration-duration-of-the-administrative-procedure-reasonable-period-of-time</guid><dc:identifier><![CDATA[3d36a592-9ba3-44f3-9fdc-a4e6cedb8355-348000]]></dc:identifier></item></channel></rss>