﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!--RSS Genrated: Fri, 24 Jul 2026 23:23:14 GMT--><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:ev="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/event/"><channel><title>Modro poslovanje=varno in uspešno poslovanje</title><link>https://www.modro-poslovanje.si:443/en-us/Sporočila/rss/522</link><atom:link href="https://www.modro-poslovanje.si:443/en-us/Sporočila/rss/522" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><description>RSS document</description><item><dc:creator><![CDATA[Admin MPS]]></dc:creator><title><![CDATA[CELEX:62025CO0255_SUM: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 29 June 2026.#Technikes Anaktisis kai Diachorismou AE (ECORESET AE) v Perifereia Attikis.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Reply which may be clearly deduced from existing case-law – Private investment aid scheme – Aid scheme compatible with the internal market – Refusal by the competent authority to grant aid under that scheme – Legal action seeking annulment of that refusal decision – Retroactive effect of a possible judicial annulment of that refusal decision – Expiry, during the legal proceedings, of the period laid down for granting the aid under that aid scheme – Date on which the aid concerned is deemed to have been granted – Article 47 of the Charter of ]]></title><link>https://www.modro-poslovanje.si/en-us/Sporočila/celex62025co0255-sum-order-of-the-court-seventh-chamber-of-29-june-2026technikes-anaktisis-kai-diachorismou-ae-ecoreset-ae-v-perifereia-attikisreference-for-a-preliminary-ruling-article-99-of-the-rules-of-procedure-of-the-court-of-justice-reply-which-may-be-clearly-deduced-from-existing-case-law-private-investment-aid-scheme-aid-scheme-compatible-with-the-internal-market-refusal-by-the-competent-authority-to-grant-aid-under-that-scheme-legal-action-seeking-annulment-of-that-refusal-decision-retroactive-effect-of-a-possible-judicial-annulment-of-that-refusal-decision-expiry-during-the-legal-proceedings-of-the-period-laid-down-for-granting-the-aid-under-that-aid-scheme-date-on-which-the-aid-concerned-is-deemed-to-have-been-granted-article-47-of-the-charter-of-fundamental</link><description><![CDATA[]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 12:04:59 GMT</pubDate><guid>https://www.modro-poslovanje.si/en-us/Sporočila/celex62025co0255-sum-order-of-the-court-seventh-chamber-of-29-june-2026technikes-anaktisis-kai-diachorismou-ae-ecoreset-ae-v-perifereia-attikisreference-for-a-preliminary-ruling-article-99-of-the-rules-of-procedure-of-the-court-of-justice-reply-which-may-be-clearly-deduced-from-existing-case-law-private-investment-aid-scheme-aid-scheme-compatible-with-the-internal-market-refusal-by-the-competent-authority-to-grant-aid-under-that-scheme-legal-action-seeking-annulment-of-that-refusal-decision-retroactive-effect-of-a-possible-judicial-annulment-of-that-refusal-decision-expiry-during-the-legal-proceedings-of-the-period-laid-down-for-granting-the-aid-under-that-aid-scheme-date-on-which-the-aid-concerned-is-deemed-to-have-been-granted-article-47-of-the-charter-of-fundamental</guid><dc:identifier><![CDATA[3d36a592-9ba3-44f3-9fdc-a4e6cedb8355-348844]]></dc:identifier></item><item><dc:creator><![CDATA[Admin MPS]]></dc:creator><title><![CDATA[CELEX:62026CO0068_SUM: Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 27 March 2026.#Criminal proceedings against DK.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski gradski sad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Urgent preliminary ruling procedure – Area of freedom, security and justice – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Directive (EU) 2016/343 – Article 8(1) and (2) – Right to be present at the trial – Express or tacit but unequivocal waiver – National legislation interpreted as allowing a person who is the subject of criminal prosecution to be kept in detention in order for his or her right to be present at the trial to be safeguarded.#Case C-68/26 PPU.]]></title><link>https://www.modro-poslovanje.si/en-us/Sporočila/celex62026co0068-sum-order-of-the-court-fifth-chamber-of-27-march-2026criminal-proceedings-against-dkrequest-for-a-preliminary-ruling-from-the-sofiyski-gradski-sadreference-for-a-preliminary-ruling-urgent-preliminary-ruling-procedure-area-of-freedom-security-and-justice-article-99-of-the-rules-of-procedure-of-the-court-of-justice-judicial-cooperation-in-criminal-matters-directive-eu-2016343-article-81-and-2-right-to-be-present-at-the-trial-express-or-tacit-but-unequivocal-waiver-national-legislation-interpreted-as-allowing-a-person-who-is-the-subject-of-criminal-prosecution-to-be-kept-in-detention-in-order-for-his-or-her-right-to-be-present-at-the-trial-to-be-safeguardedcase-c-6826-ppu</link><description><![CDATA[]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 12:04:59 GMT</pubDate><guid>https://www.modro-poslovanje.si/en-us/Sporočila/celex62026co0068-sum-order-of-the-court-fifth-chamber-of-27-march-2026criminal-proceedings-against-dkrequest-for-a-preliminary-ruling-from-the-sofiyski-gradski-sadreference-for-a-preliminary-ruling-urgent-preliminary-ruling-procedure-area-of-freedom-security-and-justice-article-99-of-the-rules-of-procedure-of-the-court-of-justice-judicial-cooperation-in-criminal-matters-directive-eu-2016343-article-81-and-2-right-to-be-present-at-the-trial-express-or-tacit-but-unequivocal-waiver-national-legislation-interpreted-as-allowing-a-person-who-is-the-subject-of-criminal-prosecution-to-be-kept-in-detention-in-order-for-his-or-her-right-to-be-present-at-the-trial-to-be-safeguardedcase-c-6826-ppu</guid><dc:identifier><![CDATA[3d36a592-9ba3-44f3-9fdc-a4e6cedb8355-348843]]></dc:identifier></item><item><dc:creator><![CDATA[Admin MPS]]></dc:creator><title><![CDATA[CELEX:62023CJ0728_SUM: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 March 2026.#Kingdom of Spain v Council of the European Union and Représentant spécial de l’Union européenne en Bosnie-Herzégovine.#Appeal – Staff coming under the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) – International contract staff member hired by the European Union Special Representative in Bosnia and Herzegovina – Successive fixed-term employment contracts – Termination of the employment contract following the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union – Appeal brought by a Member State which did not intervene in the proceedings before the General Court – Third paragraph of Article 56 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union – Admissibility of the]]></title><link>https://www.modro-poslovanje.si/en-us/Sporočila/celex62023cj0728-sum-judgment-of-the-court-first-chamber-of-12-march-2026kingdom-of-spain-v-council-of-the-european-union-and-représentant-spécial-de-lunion-européenne-en-bosnie-herzégovineappeal-staff-coming-under-the-common-foreign-and-security-policy-cfsp-international-contract-staff-member-hired-by-the-european-union-special-representative-in-bosnia-and-herzegovina-successive-fixed-term-employment-contracts-termination-of-the-employment-contract-following-the-withdrawal-of-the-united-kingdom-of-great-britain-and-northern-ireland-from-the-european-union-appeal-brought-by-a-member-state-which-did-not-intervene-in-the-proceedings-before-the-general-court-third-paragraph-of-article-56-of-the-statute-of-the-court-of-justice-of-the-european-union-admissibility-of-the-appeal-</link><description><![CDATA[]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 12:04:59 GMT</pubDate><guid>https://www.modro-poslovanje.si/en-us/Sporočila/celex62023cj0728-sum-judgment-of-the-court-first-chamber-of-12-march-2026kingdom-of-spain-v-council-of-the-european-union-and-représentant-spécial-de-lunion-européenne-en-bosnie-herzégovineappeal-staff-coming-under-the-common-foreign-and-security-policy-cfsp-international-contract-staff-member-hired-by-the-european-union-special-representative-in-bosnia-and-herzegovina-successive-fixed-term-employment-contracts-termination-of-the-employment-contract-following-the-withdrawal-of-the-united-kingdom-of-great-britain-and-northern-ireland-from-the-european-union-appeal-brought-by-a-member-state-which-did-not-intervene-in-the-proceedings-before-the-general-court-third-paragraph-of-article-56-of-the-statute-of-the-court-of-justice-of-the-european-union-admissibility-of-the-appeal-</guid><dc:identifier><![CDATA[3d36a592-9ba3-44f3-9fdc-a4e6cedb8355-348842]]></dc:identifier></item><item><dc:creator><![CDATA[Admin MPS]]></dc:creator><title><![CDATA[CELEX:62026TO0024:            Ordonnance du Tribunal (dixième chambre) du 17 juillet 2026.#Alfio Cerami contre Commission européenne.#Fonction publique – Article 76, sous d), du règlement de procédure – Méconnaissance des exigences de forme – Recours manifestement irrecevable – Demande d’aide juridictionnelle.#Affaire T-24/26.]]></title><link>https://www.modro-poslovanje.si/en-us/Sporočila/celex62026to0024-ordonnance-du-tribunal-dixième-chambre-du-17-juillet-2026alfio-cerami-contre-commission-européennefonction-publique-article-76-sous-d-du-règlement-de-procédure-méconnaissance-des-exigences-de-forme-recours-manifestement-irrecevable-demande-daide-juridictionnelleaffaire-t-2426</link><description><![CDATA[This document does not exist in English.]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 12:04:59 GMT</pubDate><guid>https://www.modro-poslovanje.si/en-us/Sporočila/celex62026to0024-ordonnance-du-tribunal-dixième-chambre-du-17-juillet-2026alfio-cerami-contre-commission-européennefonction-publique-article-76-sous-d-du-règlement-de-procédure-méconnaissance-des-exigences-de-forme-recours-manifestement-irrecevable-demande-daide-juridictionnelleaffaire-t-2426</guid><dc:identifier><![CDATA[3d36a592-9ba3-44f3-9fdc-a4e6cedb8355-348841]]></dc:identifier></item><item><dc:creator><![CDATA[Admin MPS]]></dc:creator><title><![CDATA[CELEX:62024TO0116(01):            Beschluss des Gerichts (Zweite Kammer) vom 17. Juli 2026.#DZ Bank AG Deutsche Zentral-Genossenschaftsbank, Frankfurt am Main gegen Einheitlicher Abwicklungsausschuss.#Wirtschafts- und Währungspolitik – Bankenunion – Einheitlicher Abwicklungsmechanismus für Kreditinstitute und bestimmte Wertpapierfirmen (SRM) – Verordnung (EU) Nr. 806/2014 – Mindestanforderung an Eigenmittel und berücksichtigungsfähige Verbindlichkeiten – Entscheidung des Beschwerdeausschusses des SRB über die Festlegung von Mindestanforderungen an Eigenmittel und berücksichtigungsfähige Verbindlichkeiten – Abänderungsantrag – Teilweise offensichtliche Unzulässigkeit – Art. 85 Abs. 3 der Verordnung Nr. 806/2014 – Unzuständigkeit des Urhebers der Handlung – Teilweise offensichtlich begründet]]></title><link>https://www.modro-poslovanje.si/en-us/Sporočila/celex62024to011601-beschluss-des-gerichts-zweite-kammer-vom-17-juli-2026dz-bank-ag-deutsche-zentral-genossenschaftsbank-frankfurt-am-main-gegen-einheitlicher-abwicklungsausschusswirtschafts-und-währungspolitik-bankenunion-einheitlicher-abwicklungsmechanismus-für-kreditinstitute-und-bestimmte-wertpapierfirmen-srm-verordnung-eu-nr-8062014-mindestanforderung-an-eigenmittel-und-berücksichtigungsfähige-verbindlichkeiten-entscheidung-des-beschwerdeausschusses-des-srb-über-die-festlegung-von-mindestanforderungen-an-eigenmittel-und-berücksichtigungsfähige-verbindlichkeiten-abänderungsantrag-teilweise-offensichtliche-unzulässigkeit-art-85-abs-3-der-verordnung-nr-8062014-unzuständigkeit-des-urhebers-der-handlung-teilweise-offensichtlich-begründete-klagerechtssache-t-1</link><description><![CDATA[This document does not exist in English.]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 12:04:59 GMT</pubDate><guid>https://www.modro-poslovanje.si/en-us/Sporočila/celex62024to011601-beschluss-des-gerichts-zweite-kammer-vom-17-juli-2026dz-bank-ag-deutsche-zentral-genossenschaftsbank-frankfurt-am-main-gegen-einheitlicher-abwicklungsausschusswirtschafts-und-währungspolitik-bankenunion-einheitlicher-abwicklungsmechanismus-für-kreditinstitute-und-bestimmte-wertpapierfirmen-srm-verordnung-eu-nr-8062014-mindestanforderung-an-eigenmittel-und-berücksichtigungsfähige-verbindlichkeiten-entscheidung-des-beschwerdeausschusses-des-srb-über-die-festlegung-von-mindestanforderungen-an-eigenmittel-und-berücksichtigungsfähige-verbindlichkeiten-abänderungsantrag-teilweise-offensichtliche-unzulässigkeit-art-85-abs-3-der-verordnung-nr-8062014-unzuständigkeit-des-urhebers-der-handlung-teilweise-offensichtlich-begründete-klagerechtssache-t-1</guid><dc:identifier><![CDATA[3d36a592-9ba3-44f3-9fdc-a4e6cedb8355-348840]]></dc:identifier></item><item><dc:creator><![CDATA[Admin MPS]]></dc:creator><title><![CDATA[CELEX:32026D04079: Decision of the Bureau of the European Parliament of 15 June 2026 amending the Implementing Measures for the Statute for Members of the European Parliament]]></title><link>https://www.modro-poslovanje.si/en-us/Sporočila/celex32026d04079-decision-of-the-bureau-of-the-european-parliament-of-15june-2026-amending-the-implementing-measures-for-the-statute-for-members-of-the-european-parliament</link><description><![CDATA[]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 22:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>https://www.modro-poslovanje.si/en-us/Sporočila/celex32026d04079-decision-of-the-bureau-of-the-european-parliament-of-15june-2026-amending-the-implementing-measures-for-the-statute-for-members-of-the-european-parliament</guid><dc:identifier><![CDATA[3d36a592-9ba3-44f3-9fdc-a4e6cedb8355-348845]]></dc:identifier></item><item><dc:creator><![CDATA[Admin MPS]]></dc:creator><title><![CDATA[CELEX:32026R1744: Regulation (EU) 2026/1744 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 July 2026 amending Regulations (EU) 2024/1689, (EU) 2018/1139 and (EU) 2023/1230 as regards the simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) (Text with EEA relevance)]]></title><link>https://www.modro-poslovanje.si/en-us/Sporočila/celex32026r1744-regulation-eu-20261744-of-the-european-parliament-and-of-the-council-of-8-july-2026-amending-regulations-eu-20241689-eu-20181139-and-eu-20231230-as-regards-the-simplification-of-the-implementation-of-harmonised-rules-on-artificial-intelligence-digital-omnibus-on-ai-text-with-eea-relevance</link><description><![CDATA[]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 22:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>https://www.modro-poslovanje.si/en-us/Sporočila/celex32026r1744-regulation-eu-20261744-of-the-european-parliament-and-of-the-council-of-8-july-2026-amending-regulations-eu-20241689-eu-20181139-and-eu-20231230-as-regards-the-simplification-of-the-implementation-of-harmonised-rules-on-artificial-intelligence-digital-omnibus-on-ai-text-with-eea-relevance</guid><dc:identifier><![CDATA[3d36a592-9ba3-44f3-9fdc-a4e6cedb8355-348846]]></dc:identifier></item><item><dc:creator><![CDATA[Admin MPS]]></dc:creator><title><![CDATA[CELEX:32026R1738: Regulation (EU) 2026/1738 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 July 2026 on circularity requirements for vehicle design and on management of end-of-life vehicles, amending Regulations (EU) No 168/2013, (EU) 2018/858, (EU) 2019/1020 and (EU) 2023/1542 and repealing Directives 2000/53/EC and 2005/64/EC (Text with EEA relevance)]]></title><link>https://www.modro-poslovanje.si/en-us/Sporočila/celex32026r1738-regulation-eu-20261738-of-the-european-parliament-and-of-the-council-of-8-july-2026-on-circularity-requirements-for-vehicle-design-and-on-management-of-end-of-life-vehicles-amending-regulations-eu-no-1682013-eu-2018858-eu-20191020-and-eu-20231542-and-repealing-directives-200053ec-and-200564ec-text-with-eea-relevance</link><description><![CDATA[]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 22:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>https://www.modro-poslovanje.si/en-us/Sporočila/celex32026r1738-regulation-eu-20261738-of-the-european-parliament-and-of-the-council-of-8-july-2026-on-circularity-requirements-for-vehicle-design-and-on-management-of-end-of-life-vehicles-amending-regulations-eu-no-1682013-eu-2018858-eu-20191020-and-eu-20231542-and-repealing-directives-200053ec-and-200564ec-text-with-eea-relevance</guid><dc:identifier><![CDATA[3d36a592-9ba3-44f3-9fdc-a4e6cedb8355-348847]]></dc:identifier></item><item><dc:creator><![CDATA[Admin MPS]]></dc:creator><title><![CDATA[CELEX:62025TO0005(01)_INF: Order of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 9 March 2026.#HD and Others v European Parliament and European External Action Service.#Case T-5/25.]]></title><link>https://www.modro-poslovanje.si/en-us/Sporočila/celex62025to000501-inf-order-of-the-general-court-third-chamber-of-9-march-2026hd-andothers-v-european-parliament-and-european-external-action-servicecase-t-525</link><description><![CDATA[]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 12:04:54 GMT</pubDate><guid>https://www.modro-poslovanje.si/en-us/Sporočila/celex62025to000501-inf-order-of-the-general-court-third-chamber-of-9-march-2026hd-andothers-v-european-parliament-and-european-external-action-servicecase-t-525</guid><dc:identifier><![CDATA[3d36a592-9ba3-44f3-9fdc-a4e6cedb8355-348838]]></dc:identifier></item><item><dc:creator><![CDATA[Admin MPS]]></dc:creator><title><![CDATA[CELEX:62025TO0734_INF: Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 10 June 2026.#Skechers USA, Inc. II v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark CONTOUR FOAM – Absolute ground for refusal – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-734/25.]]></title><link>https://www.modro-poslovanje.si/en-us/Sporočila/celex62025to0734-inf-order-of-the-general-court-sixth-chamber-of-10-june-2026skechers-usa-inc-ii-v-european-union-intellectual-property-officeeu-trade-mark-international-registration-designating-the-european-union-word-mark-contour-foam-absolute-ground-for-refusal-descriptive-character-article-71c-of-regulation-eu-20171001-action-manifestly-lacking-any-foundation-in-lawcase-t-73425</link><description><![CDATA[]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 12:04:54 GMT</pubDate><guid>https://www.modro-poslovanje.si/en-us/Sporočila/celex62025to0734-inf-order-of-the-general-court-sixth-chamber-of-10-june-2026skechers-usa-inc-ii-v-european-union-intellectual-property-officeeu-trade-mark-international-registration-designating-the-european-union-word-mark-contour-foam-absolute-ground-for-refusal-descriptive-character-article-71c-of-regulation-eu-20171001-action-manifestly-lacking-any-foundation-in-lawcase-t-73425</guid><dc:identifier><![CDATA[3d36a592-9ba3-44f3-9fdc-a4e6cedb8355-348837]]></dc:identifier></item></channel></rss>