Išči

BAZA ZNANJA

Praksa Sodišča EU (DAVKI)

CELEX:62025TJ0042_INF:           Arrêt du Tribunal (première chambre) du 1er juillet 2026.#DecoTrend GmbH contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle.#Dessin ou modèle de l’Union européenne – Procédure de nullité – Dessin ou modèle de l’Union européenne enregistré représentant un abat-jour – Motif de nullité – Non-respect des conditions de protection ‑ Article 25, paragraphe 1, sous b), du règlement (CE) no 6/2002 – Absence de caractère individuel – Article 6 du règlement no 6/2002 – Examen d’office des faits – Article 63, paragraphe 1, du règlement no 6/2002.#Affaire T-42/25.

Anonym 0 0
This document does not exist in English.
Read more

CELEX:62025TO0671_INF:           Ordonnance du Tribunal (cinquième chambre) du 11 mai 2026.#TNG Stadtnetz GmbH contre Commission européenne.#Recours en annulation – Aides d’État – Fonds publics pour le développement de réseaux à haut débit – Plainte – Examen préliminaire d’une prétendue aide d’État illégale – Lettre d’information – Article 24, paragraphe 2, du règlement (UE) 2015/1589 – Acte préparatoire – Acte non susceptible de recours – Irrecevabilité.#Affaire T-671/25.

Anonym 0 0
This document does not exist in English.
Read more

CELEX:62025TJ0412_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 17 June 2026.#Parkster AB v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark PARKNER – Earlier EU word mark PARKSTER – Earlier national figurative mark Parkster – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Similarity of the goods and services – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-412/25.

Anonym 0 0
Read more

CELEX:62025TJ0267_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 3 June 2026.#Osculati Srl v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark O – Earlier EU figurative mark O – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Facts or evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Article 95(2) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-267/25.

Anonym 0 0
Read more

CELEX:62024TJ0433_INF: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 25 February 2026.#Edward William Batchelor v European Commission.#Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Regulation (EU) 2022/1925 – Documents relating to designation as a gatekeeper – Refusal of access – Obligation to state reasons – Exception relating to the protection of court proceedings – Exception relating to the protection of the purpose of inspections, investigations and audits – Overriding public interest – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-433/24.

Anonym 0 0
Read more

CELEX:62025TO0839_INF:           Ordonnance du Tribunal (sixième chambre) du 16 juillet 2026.#Team Beverage AG contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle.#Marque de l’Union européenne – Procédure de nullité – Marque de l’Union européenne verbale TEAM – Cause de nullité absolue – Procédure devant la division d’annulation – Recours manifestement dépourvu de tout fondement en droit.#Affaire T-839/25.

Anonym 0 0
This document does not exist in English.
Read more

CELEX:62024TJ0365_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 28 January 2026.#LU v European Investment Bank.#Civil service – EIB staff – Psychological harassment – Administrative inquiry – Request for assistance – Rejection of the request – Decision to initiate disciplinary proceedings – Action for annulment – Act not open to challenge – Preparatory act – Admissibility – Obligation to state reasons – Error of assessment – Liability.#Case T-365/24.

Anonym 0 0
Read more

CELEX:62024CJ0075_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 15 January 2026.#XH v European Commission.#Appeal – Civil service – European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) – Allegations of psychological harassment during periods of sick leave – Rejection of the request for assistance and of the claim for compensation – Opening of an invalidity procedure – Action for annulment and for damages – Admissibility – Acts open to challenge – Obligation on the part of the General Court of the European Union to state reasons – Contradictory reasoning – Distortion of the facts and evidence.#Case C-75/24 P.

Anonym 0 0
Read more

CELEX:62025TO0156_INF: Order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 18 February 2026.#Accord Healthcare France SAS and Others v European Parliament and Council of the European Union.#Actions for annulment – Environment – Urban wastewater treatment – Articles 1, 2, 9, 10 and 30 of, and Annexes I and III to, Directive (EU) 2024/3019 – Extended producer responsibility for medicinal products for human use and cosmetic products – Standing to bring proceedings – Lack of individual concern – Inadmissibility.#Joined Cases T-156/25, T-157/25, T-159/25 to T-168/25, T-170/25 and T-171/25.

Anonym 0 0
Read more

CELEX:62024CO0844:           Ordonnance de la Cour (neuvième chambre) du 15 juillet 2026.#Procureur du Roi près du Tribunal de première instance de Liège, division Liège et État belge, SPF Finances contre ECDC Logistics SA e.a.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 53, paragraphe 2, ainsi qu’articles 94 et 99 du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Union douanière – Code des douanes de l’Union – Règlement (UE) no 952/2013 – Importations de marchandises – Valeur en douane – Sous-évaluation – Méthodes secondaires de détermination de la valeur en douane – Méthode fondée sur un prix moyen calculé sur la base de valeurs statistiques agrégées établies à l’échelle de l’Union européenne – Article 53 de la charte des droits fondamentaux de l’Union européenne – Recevabilité.#Affaire C-844/24.

Anonym 0 0
This document does not exist in English.
Read more

CELEX:62025CO0574:           Ordonnance de la Cour (septième chambre) du 10 juillet 2026.#Balneari Rimini contre Comune di Rimini.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 53, paragraphe 2, et article 94, sous a) et c), du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Exigence d’indication des raisons justifiant la nécessité d’une réponse par la Cour – Irrecevabilité manifeste partielle – Article 99 du règlement de procédure – Réponse pouvant être clairement déduite de la jurisprudence – Directive 2006/123/CE – Article 12, paragraphes 1 et 2 – Directive 2014/23/UE – Champ d’application – Concessions domaniales maritimes exploitées à des fins touristico-récréatives – Action indemnitaire – Réglementation prévoyant la prorogation automatique de ces concessions – Rareté des ressources naturelles – Autorité compéte

Anonym 0 0
This document does not exist in English.
Read more

CELEX:62024CA0147: Case C-147/24, Safi: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 4 June 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Den Haag, sitting at Roermond – Netherlands) – V v Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 20 TFEU – Citizenship of the Union – Directive 2008/115/EC – Return of illegally staying third-country nationals – Article 5(a) and (b) – Obligation to take account of the best interests of the child and of family life – Article 6(2) – Decision of the competent authority of the host Member State refusing to grant a derived right of residence on its territory to the third-country national, who is the parent of a minor child who is a Union citizen, and ordering that third-country national to go immediately to

Anonym 0 0
Read more

CELEX:62025TA0099: Case T-99/25: Judgment of the General Court of 10 June 2026 – European Public Prosecutor’s Office v European Court of Auditors (Law governing the institutions – Investigation by the European Public Prosecutor’s Office – Refusal by the Court of Auditors to lift the duty of confidentiality of persons called to be heard as witnesses in the investigation – Action for annulment – Challengeable act – Admissibility – Cooperation in good faith – Article 19 of the Staff Regulations – Interests of the Union)

Anonym 0 0
Read more

CELEX:62025TA0321: Case T-321/25, JLG EMEA: Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber, sitting with five judges) of 10 June 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Nederlandstalige rechtbank van eerste aanleg Brussel – Belgium) – JLG EMEA BV v Belgische Staat (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Customs Union – Common Customs Tariff – Combined Nomenclature – Heading 8427 – Fork-lift trucks, other works trucks fitted with lifting or handling equipment – Heading 8428 – Other lifting, handling, loading or unloading machinery (for example, lifts, escalators, conveyors, teleferics) – Boom lifts not mounted on a works truck, scissor lifts, articulated boom lifts, telescopic boom lifts, mobile vertical boom lifts – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/1610 – Validity)

Anonym 0 0
Read more

CELEX:62024CA0621: Case C-621/24, Landkreis Schweinfurt: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 4 June 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundessozialgericht – Germany) – Landkreis Schweinfurt v FB (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Border controls, asylum and immigration – Asylum policy – Directive 2013/33/EU – Standards for the reception of applicants for international protection – Article 2(g) – Material reception conditions – Article 17(2) – Requirement as to a guaranteed adequate standard of living – Applicant for international protection subject to a transfer decision – Provision of the material reception conditions excluding benefits in kind covering clothing, everyday items and consumables, and without payment of the financi

Anonym 0 0
Read more

CELEX:62024CA0010: Case C-10/24, Dürr Dental: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 4 June 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof – Germany) – Dürr Dental SE v Cattani Deutschland Helmes GmbH & Co. KG (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Medical devices – Regulation (EU) 2017/745 – CE marking of a medical device falling under risk class IIa – Oil-free dry air compressors for the production of compressed air for dental treatment – Making available on the market – Obligations of distributors – Verification of the classification as a medical device where the manufacturer has affixed a CE marking to the device in question as machinery)

Anonym 0 0
Read more
RSS
1345678910Last
Za funkcionalnost strani
uporabljamo piškotke,
ki ne hranijo osebnih podatkov.

Nekateri piškotki so bili
morda že servirani
v skladu z zakonodajo.

Z nadaljevanjem obiska strani soglašaš z njihovo uporabo.
 Želim več informacij