Išči

BAZA ZNANJA

Praksa Sodišča EU (DAVKI)

CELEX:62025CO0305: Order of the Court of 28 October 2025.#eBilet Polska sp. z o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-305/25 P.

Anonym 0 0

CELEX:62024TB0684: Case T-684/24: Order of the General Court of 19 September 2025 – Tone Watch v EUIPO – Munich (MUNICH10A.T.M.) (EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark MUNICH10A.T.M. – Admissibility of the appeal before the Board of Appeal – Late filing of the statement of grounds of appeal – Request for continuation of proceedings – Article 105(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94 of Regulation 2017/1001)

Anonym 0 0

CELEX:62024TA0425: Case T-425/24: Judgment of the General Court of 10 September 2025 – Ffauf Italia v EUIPO – Industria de Diseño Textil (pastaZARA Sublime) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark pastaZARA Sublime – Earlier EU word mark ZARA – Relative ground for refusal – No injury to reputation – Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 – No link between the signs – No risk of unfair advantage being taken of the mark with a reputation – Existence of due cause for the use of the mark applied for)

Anonym 0 0

CELEX:62024TA0337: Case T-337/24: Judgment of the General Court of 10 September 2025 – Smart Kid v Commission (Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Documents relating to exchanges between the Commission and the Japanese authorities referring to the applicant’s product – Partial refusal of access – Exception relating to the protection of the public interest in the field of international relations – Manifest error of assessment)

Anonym 0 0

CELEX:62022TA0583: Case T-583/22: Judgment of the General Court of 10 September 2025 – Fédération environnement durable and Others v Commission (Environment – Aarhus Convention – Rejection of a request for internal review – Article 10 of Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 – Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/2139 – Electricity generation from wind power – Taxonomy – Requirements for technical screening criteria – Article 19 of Regulation (EU) 2020/852 – Substantial contribution to climate change mitigation – Substantial contribution to climate change adaptation – No significant harm to other environmental objectives)

Anonym 0 0

CELEX:62024TA0086: Case T-86/24: Judgment of the General Court of 10 September 2025 – Vinatis v EUIPO – Vinites (VINATIS) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark VINATIS – Earlier Benelux word mark VINITES – Relative ground for refusal – Genuine use of the earlier mark – Article 47(2) and (3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Admissibility of new evidence – Article 95(2) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Cross-claim before the General Court)

Anonym 0 0

CELEX:62024TA0522: Case T-522/24: Judgment of the General Court of 10 September 2025 – Seven.One Entertainment Group v EUIPO – Celik (GERMANY’S NEXT top kebab by Uncle Charlie) (EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark GERMANY’S NEXT top kebab by Uncle Charlie – Absolute grounds for invalidity – Bad faith – Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001)

Anonym 0 0

CELEX:62023TA0435: Cases T-435/23 and T-224/24: Judgment of the General Court of 10 September 2025 – YL v Council and EUIPO (Civil service – Members of the temporary staff – Decision of the Management Board of EUIPO not to submit to the Council a proposal for extension of the applicant’s term of office – Decision of the Council not to extend the applicant’s term of office – Right to be heard – Obligation to state reasons – Manifest error of assessment – Liability)

Anonym 0 0

CELEX:62022TA0625: Case T-625/22: Judgment of the General Court of 10 September 2025 –Austria v Commission (Environment – Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1214 – Taxonomy – Economic activities in the fossil gas and nuclear energy sectors – Inclusion in sustainable economic activities – Investments – Contribution to the transition towards a carbon-neutral economy in accordance with the 1.5 °C objective fixed by the Paris Agreement – Objective of net zero emissions by 2050 – Substantial contribution to climate change mitigation and adaptation – Articles 10 and 11 of Regulation (EU) 2020/852 – Concept of low-carbon activity – Significant harm to environmental objectives – Risks associated with serious reactor accidents – Risks associated with high-level radioactive waste – Risks associated with

Anonym 0 0

CELEX:62023TA0083: Case T-83/23: Judgment of the General Court of 10 September 2025 – VP v Parliament (Law governing the institutions – Members of the Parliament – Psychological harassment – Decision of the Parliament finding that an accredited parliamentary assistant suffered psychological harassment by the applicant – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Principle of good administration – Concept of harassment – Article 12a of the Staff Regulations – Error of assessment)

Anonym 0 0
RSS
1345678910Last
Za funkcionalnost strani
uporabljamo piškotke,
ki ne hranijo osebnih podatkov.

Nekateri piškotki so bili
morda že servirani
v skladu z zakonodajo.

Z nadaljevanjem obiska strani soglašaš z njihovo uporabo.
Želim več informacij