Išči

Pravice plačnikov davkov v Sloveniji - TAXPAYERS RIGHTS in SLOVENIA

Spoštovani, vse pravice plačnikov davkov, kot so opisane v tem prispevku, so opredeljene v Ustavi Republike Slovenije (in Listini EU o temeljnih pravicah, Evropski konvenciji za človekove pravice ipd.). Slovenija nima uvedenega Kodeksa pravic plačnikov davkov (in določene pravice udejanja pomanjkljivo), zato je sistematika PPD na našem spletnem mestu urejena po kanadskem modelu. Zato (ker imamo težave na nivoju zakonov in na nivoju izvjanja zakonov) lahko določene pravice (npr. p. do zasebnosti) udejanjamo zgolj na podlagi vložitve pravnih sredstev.

Link: KODEKS ZA PRAVICE PLAČNIKOV DAVKOV ZDSS, ki ga je sprejela Zbornica davčnih svetovalcev Slovenije
s ciljem spodbujanja odločevalcev pri nas, da zberejo pogum in uvedejo Kodeks - tudi za slovenske plačnike davkov.

 

Za funkcionalnost strani
uporabljamo piškotke,
ki ne hranijo osebnih podatkov.

Nekateri piškotki so bili
morda že servirani
v skladu z zakonodajo.

Z nadaljevanjem obiska strani soglašaš z njihovo uporabo.
 Želim več informacij
0 0

CELEX:62020TA0295: Case T-295/20: Judgment of the General Court of 8 February 2023 — Aquind and Others v Commission (Energy — Trans-European energy infrastructure — Regulation (EU) No 347/2013 — Delegated regulation amending the list of projects of common interest — Second paragraph of Article 172 TFEU — Refusal of a Member State to give its approval to a proposed electricity interconnector with a view to granting the status of a project of common interest — Non-inclusion by the Commission of the project in the amended list — Obligation to state reasons — Principle of good administration — Equal treatment — Legal certainty — Legitimate expectations — Proportionality — Article 10 of the Energy Charter Treaty)

0 0

CELEX:62020TA0301: Case T-301/20: Judgment of the General Court of 1 March 2023 — Hengshi Egypt Fiberglass Fabrics and Jushi Egypt for Fiberglass Industry v Commission (Dumping — Imports of certain woven or stitched glass fibre fabrics originating in China and Egypt — Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/492 — Definitive anti-dumping duty — Calculation of the normal value — Article 2(5) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 — Manifest error of assessment — Injury — Calculation of the undercutting margin)

0 0

CELEX:62020TA0302: Joined Cases T-302/20, T-303/20 and T-307/20: Judgment of the General Court of 22 November 2023 — Del Valle Ruíz and Others v SRB (Economic and monetary union — Banking union — Single resolution mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) — Resolution of Banco Popular Español — Decision of the SRB refusing to grant compensation to the shareholders and creditors affected by the resolution actions — Right to property — Right to be heard — Right to an effective remedy — Valuation of difference in treatment — Independence of the valuer)

0 0

CELEX:62020TA0304: Case T-304/20: Judgment of the General Court of 22 November 2023 — Molina Fernández v SRB (Economic and monetary union — Banking union — Single resolution mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) — Resolution of Banco Popular Español — Decision of the SRB refusing to grant compensation to the shareholders and creditors affected by the resolution actions — Valuation of difference in treatment — Independence of the valuer)

0 0

CELEX:62020TA0306: Case T-306/20: Judgment of the General Court of 29 June 2022 — Hijos de Moisés Rodríguez González v EUIPO — Ireland and Ornua (La Irlandesa 1943) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU figurative mark La Irlandesa 1943 — Absolute grounds for invalidity — Declaration of invalidity by the Grand Board of Appeal of EUIPO — Evidence submitted for the first time before the Court — Relevant date for the examination of an absolute ground for invalidity — Mark of such a nature as to deceive the public — Article 7(1)(g) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(g) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Bad faith — Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001))

0 0

CELEX:62020TA0312: Case T-312/20: Judgment of the General Court of 17 May 2023 — EVH v Commission (Competition — Concentrations — German electricity market — Decision declaring a concentration compatible with the internal market — Action for annulment — Locus standi — Admissibility — Obligation to state reasons — Concept of a ‘single concentration’ — Right to effective judicial protection — Right to be heard — Definition of the market — Analysis period — Analysis of market power — Decisive influence — Manifest errors of assessment — Due diligence obligation)

0 0

CELEX:62020TA0313: Case T-313/20: Judgment of the General Court of 17 May 2023 — Stadtwerke Leipzig v Commission (Competition — Concentrations — German electricity market — Decision declaring the concentration compatible with the internal market — Action for annulment — Standing to bring proceedings — Admissibility — Obligation to state reasons — Definition of ‘single concentration’ — Right to effective judicial protection — Right to be heard — Definition of the market — Analysis period — Analysis of market power — Decisive influence — Manifest errors of assessment — Duty of care)

0 0

CELEX:62020TA0315: Case T-315/20: Judgment of the General Court of 17 May 2023 — TEAG v Commission (Competition — Concentrations — German electricity market — Decision declaring the concentration compatible with the internal market — Action for annulment — Standing to bring proceedings — Admissibility — Obligation to state reasons — Definition of ‘single concentration’ — Right to effective judicial protection — Right to be heard — Definition of the market — Analysis period — Analysis of market power — Decisive influence — Manifest errors of assessment — Duty of care)

0 0

CELEX:62020TA0317: Case T-317/20: Judgment of the General Court of 17 May 2023 — EnergieVerbund Dresden v Commission (Competition — Concentrations — German electricity market — Decision declaring the concentration compatible with the internal market — Action for annulment — Standing to bring proceedings — Admissibility — Obligation to state reasons — Definition of ‘single concentration’ — Right to effective judicial protection — Right to be heard — Definition of the market — Analysis period — Analysis of market power — Decisive influence — Manifest errors of assessment — Duty of care)

0 0

CELEX:62020TA0319: Case T-319/20: Judgment of the General Court of 17 May 2023 — GGEW v Commission (Competition — Concentrations — German electricity market — Decision declaring the concentration to be compatible with the internal market — Action for annulment — Standing to bring proceedings — Admissibility — Obligation to state reasons — Concept of a ‘single concentration’ — Right to effective judicial protection — Right to be heard — Definition of the market — Period of analysis — Analysis of market power — Decisive influence — Manifest errors of assessment — Duty of diligence)

0 3

CELEX:62020TA0325: Case T-325/20: Judgment of the General Court of 26 January 2022 — Unger Marketing International v EUIPO — Orben Wasseraufbereitung (Water purifiers) (Community design — Invalidity proceedings — Design representing a water purifier — Ground for invalidity — Non-compliance with requirements for protection — Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 — Features of appearance of a product solely dictated by its technical function — Article 8(1) of Regulation No 6/2002 — Declaration of invalidity)

0 0

CELEX:62020TA0327: Case T-327/20: Judgment of the General Court of 27 April 2022 — Group Nivelles v EUIPO — Easy Sanitary Solutions (Shower drainage channel) (Community design — Invalidity proceedings — Registered Community design representing a shower drainage channel — Earlier design produced after the filing of the application for a declaration of invalidity — Article 28(1)(b)(v) of Regulation (EC) No 2245/2002 — Discretion of the Board of Appeal — Scope — Article 63(2) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 — Oral proceedings and measures of inquiry — Articles 64 and 65 of Regulation No 6/2002 — Ground for invalidity — Individual character — Article 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation No 6/2002 — Identification of the earlier design — Earlier whole design — Determination of the features of the

0 0

CELEX:62020TA0330: Case T-330/20: Judgment of the General Court of 22 November 2023 — ACMO and Others v SRB (Economic and monetary union — Banking union — Single resolution mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) — Resolution of Banco Popular Español — Decision of the SRB refusing to grant compensation to the shareholders and creditors affected by the resolution actions — Valuation of difference in treatment — Independence of the valuer)

0 0

CELEX:62020TA0333: Case T-333/20: Judgment of the General Court of 2 March 2022 — Fidia farmaceutici v EUIPO — Giuliani (IALO TSP) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark IALO TSP — Earlier international word mark HYALO — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Identification of a member of the Board of Appeal — Article 165(2) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Obligation to state reasons — Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001)

0 0

CELEX:62020TA0336: Case T-336/20: Judgment of the General Court of 9 April 2025 – Hypo Vorarlberg Bank v SRB (2016 ex ante contributions) (Economic and monetary union – Banking union – Single Resolution Mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Single Resolution Fund (SRF) – Decision of the SRB on the calculation of the 2016 ex ante contributions – Duty to state reasons – Right to be heard – Principle of legal certainty – Right to effective judicial protection – Principle of non-retroactivity – Plea of illegality)

0 0

CELEX:62020TA0337: Case T-337/20: Judgment of the General Court of 29 June 2022 — Hochmann Marketing v EUIPO (bittorrent) (EU trade mark — Board of Appeal decision confirming the revocation of an earlier decision — Article 103(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Request for conversion into a national trade mark application — Ground precluding conversion — Non-use of the EU trade mark — Article 139(2)(a) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Right to be heard — Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights)

0 0

CELEX:62020TA0340: Case T-340/20: Judgment of the General Court of 22 November 2023 — Galván Fernández-Guillén v SRB (Economic and monetary union — Banking union — Single Resolution Mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) — Resolution of Banco Popular Español — Decision of the SRB refusing to grant compensation to shareholders and creditors concerned by the resolution actions — Right to property — Rights of the defence — Valuation of difference in treatment — Independence of the valuer)

0 0

CELEX:62020TA0347: Case T-347/20: Judgment of the General Court of 19 October 2022 — Sogia Ellas v Commission (State aid — Activities linked to the production, processing and marketing of agricultural products — Aid schemes granted by Greece in the form of interest subsidies and State guarantees on existing and new loans to compensate for damage caused by natural disasters or exceptional occurrences — Decision declaring the aid schemes incompatible with the internal market and unlawful and ordering the recovery of the aid paid — Aid limited to disaster-hit geographical areas — Advantage — Selectivity — Market economy operator principle — Principle of sound administration — Right to be heard — Length of the procedure — Protection of legitimate expectations — Limitation period — Article 17 o

0 0

CELEX:62020TA0355: Case T-355/20: Judgment of the General Court of 1 June 2022 — Krasnyj Octyabr v EUIPO — Pokój (Pokój TRADYCJA JAKOŚĆ KRÓWKA SŁODKIE CHWILE Z DZIECIŃSTWA TRADYCYJNA RECEPTURA) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU figurative mark Pokój TRADYCJA JAKOŚĆ KRÓWKA SŁODKIE CHWILE Z DZIECIŃSTWA TRADYCYJNA RECEPTURA — Earlier international figurative mark KOPOBKA KOROVKA — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

0 0

CELEX:62020TA0363: Case T-363/20: Judgment of the General Court of 1 June 2022 — Krasnyj Octyabr v EUIPO — Pokój (KRÓWKA MLECZNA Milk FUDGE) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU figurative mark KRÓWKA MLECZNA Milk FUDGE — Earlier international figurative mark KOPOBKA KOROVKA — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Right to be heard — Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001)

RSS
First108109110111113115116117Last
Please edit and save settings.