Vrsta AI: Disclaimer AI Kaj prejmete
AI Davčni Asistent: modro-poslovanje.si

Problemi z davčnim postopkom, vodenje poslovnih? knjig....pridobite nasvet ali ponudbo za vodenje poslovnih knjig ali pomoč pri preoblikovanju podjetja (normiranec, lmet, zavod, d.o.o.....), inšpekcije....
AI Davki/Računovodstvo

Problemi z razumevanjem davkov, prispevkov?....svetovalec potrdi odgovor na vprašanja o DAVKIH - AI modri davčni nasvet pa naredi (Povzetek → Razlaga → Koraki → Viri. in Potrditev odgovora s strani Derganc Franc)
 (Rezervirajte termin pri DAVČNEM SVETOVALCU - mag. Franc Derganc)

Išči

Sodna praksa Sodišča EU, lastni članki, spremembe davčne zakonodaje....

Izbrani prispeveki - novice o davkih pri nas in v EU - NEWS about TAXES

V družbi TAXIN d.o.o. (mag. Franc Derganc), partnerici Mreže Modro Poslovanje preučujemo davčno-pravna in druga poslovno-pravna vprašanja na podlagi študija sodne prakse Sodišča EU in slovenskih sodišč, preučevati moramo pravne predpise EU in domače pravne predpise ter spremljamo "potrebe" strank - podjetij, ki delujejo v Republiki Sloveniji ter na t.i. mednarodnih trgih. 


Mreža modro poslovanje, na dnevnem nivoju, spremlja spremembe iz spodaj navedenih baz podatkov.

    The partners (TAXIN d.o.o.) of the Wisdom Business Network study tax, legal and other business-legal issues based on the study of the case law of the Court of Justice of the EU and Slovenian courts, they must study EU legal regulations and domestic legal regulations, and they must monitor the needs of customers - companies that operate in the Republic of Slovenia and operate also on the so-called international markets.

The Wisdom business network monitors changes from the databases listed below on a daily basis.


 

CELEX:62025CN0825: Case C-825/25 P: Appeal brought on 11 December 2025 by Maria Albot against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 1 October 2025 in Case T-343/24 Albot v Council

February 16, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62024CB0807: Case C-807/24, Blue Style: Order of the President of the Court of 24 November 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší soud – Czech Republic) – Blue Style a.s. v N. K.

February 16, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:32025R2033R(04)

The corrigendum does not concern the English version.
February 16, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:32018L0851R(06)

The corrigendum does not concern the English version.
February 16, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:32013L0033R(06)

The corrigendum does not concern the English version.
February 16, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:32014L0065R(18)

The corrigendum does not concern the English version.
February 16, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62022TJ0648_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber, Extended Composition) of 25 June 2025.#ClientEarth AISBL v Council of the European Union.#Common fisheries policy – Conservation of resources – Total allowable catches – Fish stocks shared with the United Kingdom – Trade and Cooperation Agreement between the European Union and the United Kingdom – Regulation (EU) 2022/515 – Request for internal review of an administrative act under environmental law – Article 2(1)(f) and Article 10 of Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 – Objective of achieving a maximum sustainable yield exploitation rate at the latest by 2020 for all stocks – Articles 2, 3, 9, 10, 15 and 16 of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013 – Socioeconomic and employment objectives – Best available scientific advice – Landing ob

February 14, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62023TJ0299_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 24 September 2025.#Hexal AG v European Commission.#Case T-299/23.

February 14, 2026 0 Comments

Obvestilo o sodbi Sodišča Evropske unije (T-646/24) v zvezi z obravnavo tristranskega posla v verigi dobav štirih udeležencev

February 13, 2026 0 Comments

UPRS Sodba I U 766/2021-10

O pravnih vprašanjih organ odloča samostojno in je vezan zgolj na zakon, ne pa tudi na presojo, ki jo opravi sam davčni zavezanec. Zato organ pri priznanju višine kilometrine ni vezan na tožnikov zahtevek, temveč mora odločati skladno z zakonom, davčni zavezanec pa pravilno uporabo prava lahko zahteva v postopku izdaje odmerne odločbe oziroma v pritožbenem postopku in glede tega ni prekludiran z rokom iz drugega odstavka 289. člena ZDavP-2. Ker davčna organa te presoje nista opravila (saj sta sama pojasnila, da sta le sledila tožnikovemu zahtevku), je bila izpodbijana odločba v delu odločitve glede stroškov prevoza po četrtem odstavku 41. člena ZDavP-2 sprejeta s kršenjem pravil postopka. V civilnopravnih razmerjih se podjetnik zaveže naročniku opraviti določen posel (obligacija rezultata). Če rezultat ne nastaja v podjetju naročnika, ni mogoče govoriti, da bi podjemnik prihajal na delo k naročniku, temveč prihaja tja v zvezi z izročitvijo (izvedbo)...
February 13, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62025TO0742(01):           Ordonnance du président du Tribunal du 12 février 2026.#NL contre Commission européenne.#Référé – Marchés publics – Exclusion des procédures d’attribution de marchés encadrées par les règlements (UE, Euratom) 2024/2509 et (UE) 2018/1877 de la sélection pour l’exécution des fonds de l’Union – Publication d’informations – Demande de sursis à exécution – Fumus boni juris – Urgence – Mise en balance des intérêts.#Affaire T-742/25 R.

This document does not exist in English.
February 13, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62025TO0404_RES:           Ordonnance du Tribunal (sixième chambre) du 12 février 2026.#Miguel Ángel Navarro Fernández contre Parlement européen.#Recours en carence – Demande d’injonction – Demande de mesures provisoires – Défaut de représentation du requérant – Défaut de régularisation – Irrecevabilité manifeste.#Affaire T-404/25.

This document does not exist in English.
February 13, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62021TO0145(01): Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 11 February 2026.#Ivan Fursin and Others v European Central Bank.#Non-contractual liability – Economic and monetary policy – Prudential supervision of credit institutions – Specific supervisory tasks conferred on the ECB – Decision to withdraw a credit institution’s authorisation – Material damage – Causal link – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-145/21.

February 13, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62025TO0260: Order of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 9 February 2026.#Leidos, Inc. and Others v European Commission.#Action for annulment – Approximation of laws – Harmonised radio spectrum – No locus standi – Lack of direct concern – Act not open to challenge – Preparatory act – Inadmissibility – Application for an order – Lack of jurisdiction.#Case T-260/25.

February 13, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62025TO0214: Order of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 10 February 2026.#IR v Council of the European Union.#Civil service – Officials – Disciplinary proceedings – Disciplinary penalty – Downgrading in the same function group – Unauthorised engagement in outside activities – Article 10 of Annex IX to the Staff Regulations – Manifest error of assessment – Proportionality – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-214/25.

February 13, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62025TO0404:           Beschluss des Gerichts (Sechste Kammer) vom 12. Februar 2026.#Miguel Ángel Navarro Fernández gegen Europäisches Parlament.#Untätigkeitsklage – Antrag auf Erteilung einer Anordnung – Antrag auf einstweilige Anordnungen – Mangelnde Vertretung des Klägers – Keine Mängelbehebung – Offensichtliche Unzulässigkeit.#Rechtssache T-404/25.

This document does not exist in English.
February 13, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62025TO0210:           Ordonnance du Tribunal (deuxième chambre) du 11 février 2026.#Agencja Wydawnicza Technopol sp. z o. o. contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle.#Marque de l’Union européenne – Procédure de nullité – Marque de l’Union européenne figurative 300 – Article 7, paragraphe 1, sous b) et c), et paragraphe 3, du règlement (UE) 2017/1001 – Article 59, paragraphe 1, sous a), et paragraphe 2, du règlement 2017/1001 – Article 94, paragraphe 1, et article 95, paragraphe 1, du règlement 2017/1001 – Absence d’acquisition d’un caractère distinctif par l’usage – Territoire pertinent – Recours manifestement dépourvu de tout fondement en droit.#Affaire T-210/25.

This document does not exist in English.
February 13, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62025TO0212:           Ordonnance du Tribunal (deuxième chambre) du 11 février 2026.#Agencja Wydawnicza Technopol sp. z o. o. contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle.#Marque de l’Union européenne – Procédure de nullité – Marque de l’Union européenne figurative 100 – Article 7, paragraphe 1, sous b) et c), et paragraphe 3, du règlement (UE) 2017/1001 – Article 59, paragraphe 1, sous a), et paragraphe 2, du règlement 2017/1001 – Article 94, paragraphe 1, et article 95, paragraphe 1, du règlement 2017/1001 – Article 102, paragraphe 1, du règlement 2017/1001 – Absence d’acquisition d’un caractère distinctif par l’usage – Territoire pertinent – Recours manifestement dépourvu de tout fondement en droit.#Affaire T-212/25.

This document does not exist in English.
February 13, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62025TO0213:           Ordonnance du Tribunal (deuxième chambre) du 11 février 2026.#Agencja Wydawnicza Technopol sp. z o. o. contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle.#Marque de l’Union européenne – Procédure de nullité – Marque de l’Union européenne figurative 100 – Article 7, paragraphe 1, sous b) et c), et paragraphe 3, du règlement (UE) 2017/1001 – Article 59, paragraphe 1, sous a), et paragraphe 2, du règlement 2017/1001 – Article 94, paragraphe 1, et article 95, paragraphe 1, du règlement 2017/1001 – Absence d’acquisition d’un caractère distinctif par l’usage – Territoire pertinent – Recours manifestement dépourvu de tout fondement en droit.#Affaire T-213/25.

This document does not exist in English.
February 13, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62021TO0135: Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 11 February 2026.#Trasta Komercbanka AS v European Central Bank.#Non-contractual liability – Economic and monetary policy – Prudential supervision of credit institutions – Specific supervisory tasks conferred on the ECB – Decision to withdraw a credit institution’s authorisation – Material damage – Causal link – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-135/21.

February 13, 2026 0 Comments
RSS
First1213141517192021Last