Išči

Sodna praksa Sodišča EU, lastni članki, spremembe davčne zakonodaje....

Izbrani prispeveki - novice o davkih pri nas in v EU - NEWS about TAXES

V družbi TAXIN d.o.o. (mag. Franc Derganc), partnerici Mreže Modro Poslovanje preučujemo davčno-pravna in druga poslovno-pravna vprašanja na podlagi študija sodne prakse Sodišča EU in slovenskih sodišč, preučevati moramo pravne predpise EU in domače pravne predpise ter spremljamo "potrebe" strank - podjetij, ki delujejo v Republiki Sloveniji ter na t.i. mednarodnih trgih. 


Mreža modro poslovanje, na dnevnem nivoju, spremlja spremembe iz spodaj navedenih baz podatkov.

    The partners (TAXIN d.o.o.) of the Wisdom Business Network study tax, legal and other business-legal issues based on the study of the case law of the Court of Justice of the EU and Slovenian courts, they must study EU legal regulations and domestic legal regulations, and they must monitor the needs of customers - companies that operate in the Republic of Slovenia and operate also on the so-called international markets.

The Wisdom business network monitors changes from the databases listed below on a daily basis.


 

CELEX:62022CC0769: Opinion of Advocate General Ćapeta delivered on 5 June 2025.###

June 6, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62023CO0786_SUM: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 4 July 2024.#Eugen Tomac v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Law governing the institutions – Article 265 TFEU – Action for failure to act – Full application of the provisions of the Schengen acquis in Romania – Obligation to adopt a decision pursuant to the Act concerning the conditions of accession to the European Union of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania – Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.#Case C-786/23 P.

June 6, 2025 0 Comments

Novosti s področja porekla blaga v letu 2025 in prehodne določbe, PEM pravila in revidirana PEM pravila, možnosti prehoda med pravili

Spoštovani,

vabimo Vas, da se udeležite predavanja o novostih s področja porekla blaga v letu 2025 in prehodnih določbah, PEM pravilih in revidiranih PEM pravilih, možnosti prehoda med pravili. V okviru predavanja bomo predstavili tudi veliko praktičnih primerov. Predavanje bo potekalo v veliki predavalnici FU Maribor (Titova 10, 5. nadstropje), v torek, 17. 6. 2025, s pričetkom ob 9.00 in trajanjem 2 šolski uri. Prijavite se lahko do vključno petka, 13. 6. 2025 oz. do zasedbe vseh mest.

Več na Poreklo blaga Maribor

Vašo udeležbo sporočite na elektronski naslov:  Stanko.Podgorsek(at)gov.si 

Vljudno vabljeni.

June 6, 2025 0 Comments

Plačevanje prispevkov za socialno varnost za zavarovance – osebe, ki opravljajo dejavnost kot postranski poklic

June 6, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:32022D0346R(01)

The corrigendum does not concern the English version.
June 6, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:32025D03212: Council Decision of 27 May 2025 amending Decision 1999/70/EC concerning the external auditors of the national central banks, as regards the external auditors of Latvijas Banka

June 6, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:32025D03210: Council Decision of 27 May 2025 amending Decision 1999/70/EC concerning the external auditors of the national central banks, as regards the external auditors of Lietuvos bankas

June 6, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:32025D1158: Council Decision (CFSP) 2025/1158 of 5 June 2025 amending Decision (CFSP) 2024/1472 on a European Union Diplomatic Academy

June 6, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:32025D1161: Council Decision (CFSP) 2025/1161 of 5 June 2025 amending Joint Action 2008/124/CFSP on the European Union Rule of Law Mission in Kosovo, EULEX KOSOVO

June 6, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62024TJ0076: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 4 June 2025.#Sven Benschop v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark ALWAYS RUN 4PRESIDENT – Earlier EU figurative mark PRESIDENT’s – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Enhanced distinctiveness of the earlier mark acquired through use.#Case T-76/24.

June 5, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62023TJ0271: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 4 June 2025.#Alfa-Bank JSC v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Legal persons, entities or bodies involved in economic sectors providing a substantial source of revenue to the Russian Government – Article 2(1)(g) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Action for annulment – Time limit for bringing proceedings – Partial inadmissibility – Plea of illegality – Obligation to state reason

June 5, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62023TJ0286_INF: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 11 September 2024.#OT v Council of the European Union.#Case T-286/23.

June 5, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62023TJ1061:           Arrêt du Tribunal (huitième chambre) du 4 juin 2025.#Delta-Sport Handelskontor GmbH contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle.#Dessin ou modèle communautaire – Procédure de nullité – Dessin ou modèle communautaire enregistré représentant un masque de plongée – Motifs de nullité – Caractéristiques de l’apparence d’un produit exclusivement imposées par la fonction technique de celui-ci – Article 8, paragraphe 1, du règlement (CE) no 6/2002 – Absence de caractère individuel – Article 4, paragraphe 1, et article 6, paragraphe 1, sous b), du règlement n° 6/2002.#Affaire T-1061/23.

This document does not exist in English.
June 5, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62023TJ0289:           Arrêt du Tribunal (première chambre) du 4 juin 2025.#German Khan contre Conseil de l'Union européenne.#Politique étrangère et de sécurité commune – Mesures restrictives prises eu égard aux actions compromettant ou menaçant l’intégrité territoriale, la souveraineté et l’indépendance de l’Ukraine – Gel des fonds – Liste des personnes, des entités et des organismes auxquels s’applique le gel des fonds et des ressources économiques – Maintien du nom du requérant sur la liste – Article 2, paragraphe 1, sous d) et g), de la décision 2014/145/PESC – Article 3, paragraphe 1, sous d) et g), du règlement (UE) no 269/2014 – Droit d’être entendu – Erreur d’appréciation – Proportionnalité – Droit de propriété – Liberté d’entreprise – Exception d’illégalité.#Affaire T-289/2

This document does not exist in English.
June 5, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62024TJ0199:           Arrêt du Tribunal (huitième chambre) du 4 juin 2025.#Toya Development sp. z o.o. sp.k. contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle.#Marque de l’Union européenne – Procédure de nullité – Marque de l’Union européenne figurative TOYA – Cause de nullité absolue – Mauvaise foi – Article 52, paragraphe 1, sous b), du règlement (CE) no 207/2009 [devenu article 59, paragraphe 1, sous b), du règlement (UE) 2017/1001].#Affaire T-199/24.

This document does not exist in English.
June 5, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62023CJ0284_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 27 June 2024.#TC v Firma Haus Jacobus Alten- und Altenpflegeheim gGmbH.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Measures to encourage improvements in the safety and health of pregnant workers and workers who have recently given birth or are breastfeeding – Directive 92/85/EEC – Prohibition of dismissal – Worker who became aware of her pregnancy after the expiry of the time limit for bringing an action challenging her dismissal – Option to bring such an action subject to the making of a request for leave to bring an action out of time within two weeks – Right to effective judicial protection – Principle of effectiveness.#Case C-284/23.

June 5, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62023TJ1060:           Arrêt du Tribunal (huitième chambre) du 4 juin 2025.#Delta-Sport Handelskontor GmbH contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle.#Dessin ou modèle communautaire – Procédure de nullité – Dessin ou modèle communautaire enregistré représentant un masque de plongée – Motifs de nullité – Caractéristiques de l’apparence d’un produit exclusivement imposées par la fonction technique de celui-ci – Article 8, paragraphe 1, du règlement (CE) no 6/2002 – Absence de caractère individuel – Article 4, paragraphe 1, et article 6, paragraphe 1, sous b), du règlement n° 6/2002.#Affaire T-1060/23.

This document does not exist in English.
June 5, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62024TJ0146:           Arrêt du Tribunal (quatrième chambre) du 4 juin 2025.#CV contre Commission européenne.#Fonction publique – Fonctionnaires – Rémunération – Allocations familiales – Allocation de foyer – Divorce – Versement d’une pension alimentaire à l’ex-conjoint – Charges de famille assumées effectivement par le fonctionnaire.#Affaire T-146/24.

This document does not exist in English.
June 5, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62023TJ0100_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 4 June 2025 (Extracts).#ABLV Bank AS v European Central Bank.#Access to documents – Decision 2004/258/EC – Documents relating to the announcement of a United States authority (FinCEN) concerning ABLV Bank – Partial refusal of access – Exception relating to the protection of the confidentiality of information that is protected as such under EU law – Exception relating to the protection of documents for internal use – Exception relating to the protection of exchanges of views between the ECB and the relevant authorities – Sufficiently precise nature of an application for access – Duty of the ECB to provide assistance – Article 6(1) and (2) of Decision 2004/258.#Case T-100/23.

June 5, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62024TJ0450:           Arrêt du Tribunal (dixième chambre) du 4 juin 2025.#EZ contre Commission européenne.#Fonction publique – Agents contractuels – Contrat à durée déterminée – Non-renouvellement – Rapport de fin de stage – Rapport d’évaluation – Erreur manifeste d’appréciation – Devoir de sollicitude – Règle de concordance – Responsabilité.#Affaire T-450/24.

This document does not exist in English.
June 5, 2025 0 Comments
RSS
1345678910Last