Išči

Sodna praksa Sodišča EU, lastni članki, spremembe davčne zakonodaje....

Izbrani prispeveki - novice o davkih pri nas in v EU - NEWS about TAXES

V družbi TAXIN d.o.o. (mag. Franc Derganc), partnerici Mreže Modro Poslovanje preučujemo davčno-pravna in druga poslovno-pravna vprašanja na podlagi študija sodne prakse Sodišča EU in slovenskih sodišč, preučevati moramo pravne predpise EU in domače pravne predpise ter spremljamo "potrebe" strank - podjetij, ki delujejo v Republiki Sloveniji ter na t.i. mednarodnih trgih. 


Mreža modro poslovanje, na dnevnem nivoju, spremlja spremembe iz spodaj navedenih baz podatkov.

   The partners (TAXIN d.o.o.) of the Wisdom Business Network study tax, legal and other business-legal issues based on the study of the case law of the Court of Justice of the EU and Slovenian courts, they must study EU legal regulations and domestic legal regulations, and they must monitor the needs of customers - companies that operate in the Republic of Slovenia and operate also on the so-called international markets.

The Wisdom business network monitors changes from the databases listed below on a daily basis.


 

CELEX:32026D1858R(01): Corrigendum to Council Decision (CFSP) 2026/1858 of 24 July 2026 amending Decision (CFSP) 2019/2110 on the European Union CSDP Advisory Mission in the Central African Republic (EUAM RCA) (OJ L, 2026/1858, 27.7.2026)

August 11, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:32026R1933: Council Regulation (EU) 2026/1933 of 13 July 2026 on the allocation of the fishing opportunities provided for in the Protocol on the implementation of the Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Seychelles (2026-2030)

August 11, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:32017R1369R(02)

The corrigendum does not concern the English version.
August 11, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:32026D1934: Council Decision (EU) 2026/1934 of 13 July 2026 on the signing and provisional application of the Protocol on the implementation of the Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Seychelles (2026-2030)

August 11, 2026 0 Comments

Poziv za članstvo v Posvetovalni skupini zasebnega sektorja WCO

K prijavi so posebej vabljena mala in srednja podjetja, proizvajalci ter podjetja s področja e-trgovine in digitalnega poslovanja.

Rok za prijavo je 20. avgust 2026. Več informacij in prijava: https://www.wcoomd.org/en/topics/key-issues/private-sector-consultative-group.aspx

August 10, 2026 0 Comments

Poziv za članstvo v Posvetovalni skupini zasebnega sektorja WCO

K prijavi so posebej vabljena mala in srednja podjetja, proizvajalci ter podjetja s področja e-trgovine in digitalnega poslovanja.

Rok za prijavo je 20. avgust 2026. Več informacij in prijava: https://www.wcoomd.org/en/topics/key-issues/private-sector-consultative-group.aspx

August 10, 2026 0 Comments

Pozivanje za predložitev RP-O trimesečnih davčnih zavezancev

Davčni zavezanec, katerega davčno obdobje je trimesečje, predloži obračun za trimesečno obdobje, medtem ko se rekapitulacijsko poročilo (RP-O) predloži za mesečno obdobje poročanja. RP-O se predloži le za mesec, v katerem davčni zavezanec opravi dobave, ki so predmet poročanja oziroma ko mora poročati o popravkih za pretekla obdobja poročanja. 

Če trimesečni davčni zavezanec izkaže v obračunu DDV-O dobave v polju 12, v primeru, če ne predloži RP-O za vse tri mesece oz. ni imel dobav v EU v vseh treh mesecih, prejme poziv za mesece, za katere RP-O ni predložil. Navedeno v praksi pomeni, da so npr. poziv za predložitev RP-O za obdobje junij 2026 prejeli tudi trimesečni davčni zavezanci, ki niso predložili RP-O za obdobje junij 2026 (ker niso imeli dobav v EU), so pa predložili npr. RP-O za april in/ali maj 2026. 

Davčne zavezance obveščamo, da če so bili RP-O za mesece znotraj trimesečnega davčnega obdobja že ustrezno predloženi, da pozive za RP-O za obdobje poročanja, ki je znotraj trimesečnega davčnega obdobja, za katerega niso dolžni predložiti RP-O, štejejo za brezpredmetne.

August 10, 2026 0 Comments

Pozivanje za predložitev RP-O trimesečnih davčnih zavezancev

Davčni zavezanec, katerega davčno obdobje je trimesečje, predloži obračun za trimesečno obdobje, medtem ko se rekapitulacijsko poročilo (RP-O) predloži za mesečno obdobje poročanja. RP-O se predloži le za mesec, v katerem davčni zavezanec opravi dobave, ki so predmet poročanja oziroma ko mora poročati o popravkih za pretekla obdobja poročanja. 

Če trimesečni davčni zavezanec izkaže v obračunu DDV-O dobave v polju 12, v primeru, če ne predloži RP-O za vse tri mesece oz. ni imel dobav v EU v vseh treh mesecih, prejme poziv za mesece, za katere RP-O ni predložil. Navedeno v praksi pomeni, da so npr. poziv za predložitev RP-O za obdobje junij 2026 prejeli tudi trimesečni davčni zavezanci, ki niso predložili RP-O za obdobje junij 2026 (ker niso imeli dobav v EU), so pa predložili npr. RP-O za april in/ali maj 2026. 

Davčne zavezance obveščamo, da če so bili RP-O za mesece znotraj trimesečnega davčnega obdobja že ustrezno predloženi, da pozive za RP-O za obdobje poročanja, ki je znotraj trimesečnega davčnega obdobja, za katerega niso dolžni predložiti RP-O, štejejo za brezpredmetne.

August 10, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62026CB0278: Case C-278/26 P: Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 30 June 2026 Appeal brought on 1 April 2026 by Puma SE against the judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 21 January 2026 – T-43/25, Puma v EUIPO – Ningbo Gongfang Commercial Management (Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed)

August 10, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62026CN0414: Case C-414/26, Shopping Cora Rocourt and Others: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de première instance du Brabant Wallon (Belgium) lodged on 27 April 2026 – Shopping Cora Rocourt SA v État belge

August 10, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62026CN0482: Case C-482/26, Breedsloot: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State (Netherlands) lodged on 13 May 2026 – X v Minister van Asiel en Migratie

August 10, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62026TN0363: Case T-363/26: Action brought on 9 June 2026 – YOU Solutions Germany and Troy Chemical Company v ECHA

August 10, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62026TN0391: Case T-391/26: Action brought on 26 June 2026 – Yangzhou Yangjie Electronic Technology v Council

August 10, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62026CN0415: Case C-415/26, Shopping Cora La Louvière and Others: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de première instance du Brabant Wallon (Belgium) lodged on 27 April 2026 – Shopping Cora La Louvière SA v État belge

August 10, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62026CN0432: Case C-432/26, Mitsubishi Gas Chemical Company: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hanseatisches Oberlandesgericht Hamburg (Germany) lodged on 4 May 2026 – Mitsubishi Gas Chemical Company, Inc. v FormMed HealthCare GmbH

August 10, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62025CB0255: Case C-255/25, Technikes Anaktisis kai Diachorismou: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 29 June 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Symvoulio tis Epikrateias – Greece) – Technikes Anaktisis kai Diachorismou AE (ECORESET AE) v Perifereia Attikis (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Reply which may be clearly deduced from existing case-law – Private investment aid scheme – Aid scheme compatible with the internal market – Refusal by the competent authority to grant aid under that scheme – Legal action seeking annulment of that refusal decision – Retroactive effect of a possible judicial annulment of that refusal decision – Expiry, during the legal proceedings, of the period laid down for granti

August 10, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62024CA0754: Case C-754/24 P: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 18 June 2026 – Fachverband Eisenhüttenschlacken v Commission (Appeal – Regulation (EU) 2019/1009 – Article 42(7) and (8) – Making available on the market of EU fertilising products – Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/973 – Article 2(2) and (3) – Criteria on agronomic efficiency and safety for the use of by-products in EU fertilising products – Limit values for chromium and vanadium in EU fertilising products using ferrous slags as by-products – Precautionary principle – Principle of proportionality)

August 10, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62024CA0376: Case C-376/24, FSMA: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 18 June 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d'appel de Bruxelles – Belgium) – MT v Comité de direction de l’Autorité des Services et des Marchés Financiers (FSMA) (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2003/6/EC – Article 3 – Regulation (EU) No 596/2014 – Article 10 – Unlawful disclosure of inside information – Insider dealing and market abuse – Financial services – Article 21 – Disclosure or dissemination of information in the media – Disclosure of inside information in the media by a politician – Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, signed at Rome on 4 November 1950 – Article 10 – Article 11 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Freedom of expres

August 10, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62024CA0414: Case C-414/24, Datenschutzbehörde (Relationship between remedies): Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 18 June 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof – Austria) – Datenschutzbehörde, Dr. G S (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Articles 77 and 79 – Remedies – Parallel exercise – Relationship between the lodging of a complaint with a national supervisory authority and the exercise of a judicial remedy – Risk of contradictory decisions – Principle of effective judicial protection – Procedural autonomy of the Member States – Principle of effectiveness – Principle of equivalence)

August 10, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62025CA0346: Case C-346/25, Fibo Markets: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 18 June 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší soud – Czech Republic) – FIBO Markets LTD v J.P. (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Conflicts of laws – Regulation (EC) No 593/2008 (Rome I) – Applicable law – Consumer contracts – Exceptions – Financial contracts for differences (CFDs) – Rights and obligations which constitute a financial instrument – Process of setting prices for CFDs – Difference between the exchange rate deviation accepted in the consumer’s order and the exchange rate deviation in the transaction executed)

August 10, 2026 0 Comments
RSS
1345678910Last