Vrsta AI: Disclaimer AI Kaj prejmete
AI Davčni Asistent: modro-poslovanje.si

Problemi z davčnim postopkom, vodenje poslovnih? knjig....pridobite nasvet ali ponudbo za vodenje poslovnih knjig ali pomoč pri preoblikovanju podjetja (normiranec, lmet, zavod, d.o.o.....), inšpekcije....
AI Davki/Računovodstvo

Problemi z razumevanjem davkov, prispevkov?....svetovalec potrdi odgovor na vprašanja o DAVKIH - AI modri davčni nasvet pa naredi (Povzetek → Razlaga → Koraki → Viri. in Potrditev odgovora s strani Derganc Franc)
 (Rezervirajte termin pri DAVČNEM SVETOVALCU - mag. Franc Derganc)

Išči

Pravice plačnikov davkov v Sloveniji - TAXPAYERS RIGHTS in SLOVENIA

Spoštovani, vse pravice plačnikov davkov, kot so opisane v tem prispevku, so opredeljene v Ustavi Republike Slovenije (in Listini EU o temeljnih pravicah, Evropski konvenciji za človekove pravice ipd.). Slovenija nima uvedenega Kodeksa pravic plačnikov davkov (in določene pravice udejanja pomanjkljivo), zato je sistematika PPD na našem spletnem mestu urejena po kanadskem modelu. Zato (ker imamo težave na nivoju zakonov in na nivoju izvjanja zakonov) lahko določene pravice (npr. p. do zasebnosti) udejanjamo zgolj na podlagi vložitve pravnih sredstev.

Link: KODEKS ZA PRAVICE PLAČNIKOV DAVKOV ZDSS, ki ga je sprejela Zbornica davčnih svetovalcev Slovenije
s ciljem spodbujanja odločevalcev pri nas, da zberejo pogum in uvedejo Kodeks - tudi za slovenske plačnike davkov.

 

Za funkcionalnost strani
uporabljamo piškotke,
ki ne hranijo osebnih podatkov.

Nekateri piškotki so bili
morda že servirani
v skladu z zakonodajo.

Z nadaljevanjem obiska strani soglašaš z njihovo uporabo.
 Želim več informacij
0 0

CELEX:62020TA0593: Case T-593/20: Judgment of the General Court of 18 May 2022 — Tirrenia di navigazione v Commission (State aid — Maritime transport — Service of general economic interest — Decision declaring the aid unlawful — Decision declaring the aid partly compatible and partly incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery — Rescue aid — Compatibility with the internal market — Period of six months — Extension — Requirement to submit a restructuring or liquidation plan — Guidelines on State aid for rescuing and restructuring firms in difficulty — Tax exemption — Advantage — Selective nature — Effect on trade between Member States — Adverse effect on competition — Excessive duration of the procedure — Legitimate expectations — Legal certainty — Principle of good admi

0 0

CELEX:62020TA0601: Case T-601/20: Judgment of the General Court of 18 May 2022 — Tirrenia di navigazione v Commission (State aid — Maritime transport — Service of general economic interest — Aid granted to Adriatica for the period from January 1992 to July 1994 in relation to the Brindisi/Corfu/Igoumenitsa/Patras connection — Decision declaring the aid unlawful — Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery — Interest accrued — Limitation period — New aid — Incompatibility with the internal market — Effects of a cartel on the market — Excessive duration of the procedure — Legitimate expectations — Legal certainty — Principle of good administration)

0 0

CELEX:62020TA0606: Case T-606/20: Judgment of the General Court of 15 February 2023 — Austrian Power Grid and Others v ACER (Energy — Internal market in electricity — Framework for the European platform for the exchange of balancing energy from frequency restoration reserves with automatic activation — Procedure for the adoption of terms, conditions and methodologies — Rejection of the joint proposal of the system operators — Competence of ACER — Error of law — Rights of the defence — Obligation to state reasons)

0 0

CELEX:62020TA0607: Case T-607/20: Judgment of the General Court of 15 February 2023 — Austrian Power Grid and Others v ACER (Energy — Internal market in electricity — Framework for the European platform for the exchange of balancing energy from frequency restoration reserves with manual activation — Procedure for the adoption of terms, conditions and methodologies — Rejection of the joint proposal of the system operators — Competence of ACER — Error of law — Rights of the defence — Obligation to state reasons)

0 0

CELEX:62020TA0609: Case T-609/20: Judgment of the General Court of 29 June 2022 — LA International Cooperation v Commission (Pre-Accession Assistance Instrument — OLAF investigation — Commission decision imposing an administrative sanction — Exclusion from procurement and grant award procedures covered by the general budget of the European Union for a period of four years — Registration in the early detection and exclusion system database — Financial regulation — Unlimited jurisdiction — Proportionality of the sanction)

0 0

CELEX:62020TA0624: Zaak T-624/20: Arrest van het Gerecht van 19 oktober 2022 — MV / Commissie (“Openbare dienst – Ambtenaren – Aanwerving – Aankondiging van algemeen vergelijkend onderzoek EPSO/AD/364/19 (AD 7) – Besluit van de jury om verzoeker niet toe te laten tot de volgende fase van het vergelijkend onderzoek – Voorwaarden voor toelating tot het vergelijkend onderzoek – Onvoldoende beroepservaring – Motiveringsplicht – Kennelijke beoordelingsfout – Taalregeling – Gelijke behandeling”)

0 0

CELEX:62020TA0626: Zadeva T-626/20: Sodba Splošnega sodišča z dne 21. decembra 2022 – Landwärme/Komisija (Državne pomoči – Trg bioplina – Oprostitev davka kot nadomestilo za dodatne proizvodne stroške – Sklep o nenasprotovanju – Ničnostna tožba – Pravni interes – Dopustnost – Neuvedba formalnega postopka preiskave – Resne težave – Člen 108(2) in (3) PDEU – Člen 4(3) in (4) Uredbe (EU) 2015/1589 – Smernice o državni pomoči za varstvo okolja in energijo za obdobje 2014 – 2020 – Kumulacija pomoči – Pomoči, dodeljene od več držav članic – Uvožen bioplin – Načelo prepovedi diskriminacije – Člen 110 PDEU)

0 0

CELEX:62020TA0631: Case T-631/20: Judgment of the General Court of 6 July 2022 — MZ v Commission (Civil Service — Officials — Competition EPSO/AD/363/18 for the recruitment of administrators in the field of taxation — Limitation of the choice of the second language in which the tests are to be carried out — Non-inclusion on the reserve list — Plea of illegality — Admissibility — Discrimination based on language — Special nature of the posts to be filled — Justification — Interests of the service — Proportionality)

0 0

CELEX:62020TA0639: Case T-639/20: Judgment of the General Court of 5 July 2023 — TIB Chemicals v Commission (Environment and protection of human health — Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 — Classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures — Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1182 — Classification of dioctyltin dilaurate [1]; stannane, dioctyl-, bis (coco acyloxy) derivs. [2] — Read-across — Burden of proof — Manifest error of assessment — Impact assessment)

0 0

CELEX:62020TA0641: Case T-641/20: Judgment of the General Court of 29 June 2022 — Leonine Distribution v Commission (Culture — Creative Europe Programme (2014 to 2020) — MEDIA sub-programme — Call for Proposals EACEA/05/2018 — Decision of the EACEA rejecting the applicant’s application on the ground of failure to comply with the eligibility conditions — Commission decision dismissing the administrative appeal relating to the EACEA’s decision — Concept of ‘European company’ — Grant open only to applicants owned, directly or by majority participation, by nationals of EU Member States or by nationals of other European countries participating in the sub-programme — Errors of assessment — Failure to examine the documents annexed to the proposal — Proportionality)

0 0

CELEX:62020TA0649: Cases T-649/20, T-721/20 and T-767/20: Judgment of the General Court of 5 July 2023 — Clean Aviation Joint Undertaking v NG (Arbitration clause — Seventh Framework Programme for the activities of research and development (FP7) — Grant agreements — Lack of supporting documents and non-compliance with the contractual requirements for part of the declared expenses — Repayment of the sums advanced — Jurisdiction of the General Court — Admissibility — Eligible costs — Burden of proof — Interest on arrears)

0 0

CELEX:62020TA0654: Case T-654/20: Judgment of the General Court of 16 October 2024 – Silex v Eismea (Arbitration clause – Technological research and development – Framework Programme for Research and Innovation Horizon 2020 (2014-2020) – Grant agreement – Action for annulment – Debit note – Letter rejecting declared costs as ineligible and ordering the recovery of a contribution paid to the guarantee fund – Acts not amenable to review – Acts forming part of a purely contractual framework from which they are inseparable – Inadmissibility – Reclassification of the action – Obligation to state reasons – Eligible costs – Proportionality)

0 0

CELEX:62020TA0655: Case T-655/20: Judgment of the General Court of 22 November 2023 — Symrise v ECHA (REACH — Substance 2-ethylhexyl salicylate — Exclusive use for the manufacture of cosmetic products — Checking the conformity of registrations — Request for additional toxicity studies — Article 41 of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 — Prohibition of animal testing — Article 18(1)(d) of Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 — Article 2(4)(b), Article 14(5)(b) of Regulation No 1907/2006 and Section 3 of Annex — Obligation to state reasons — Manifest error of assessment — Error of law)

0 0

CELEX:62020TA0656: Case T-656/20: Judgment of the General Court of 22 November 2023 — Symrise AG v European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) (REACH — Substance homosalate — Exclusive use for the manufacture of cosmetic products — Checking of the conformity of registrations — Request for additional toxicity studies — Article 41 of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 — Prohibition of animal testing — Article 18(1)(d) of Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 — Article 2(4)(b) and Article 14(5)(b) of Regulation No 1907/2006 and Section 3 of Annex XI thereto — Obligation to state reasons — Manifest error of assessment — Error of law)

0 0

CELEX:62020TA0657: Case T-657/20: Judgment of the General Court of 22 June 2022 — Ryanair v Commission (Finnair II; Covid-19) (State aid — Finnish air-transport market — Aid granted by Finland to Finnair in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic — Recapitalisation of an airline by its public and private shareholders on a pro rata basis in proportion to the previously existing ownership structure — Decision not to raise any objections — Temporary Framework for State aid measures — Measure intended to remedy a serious disturbance in the economy of a Member State — Derogation from certain requirements of the temporary framework — No weighing of the beneficial effects of the aid against its adverse effects on trading conditions and the maintenance of undistorted competition — Equal treatment — F

0 0

CELEX:62020TA0660: Case T-660/20: Judgment of the General Court of 20 November 2024 – Zhejiang Beyondsun Green Energy Technology v Commission (Dumping – Subsidies – Imports of crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules and cells originating in or consigned from China – Definitive anti-dumping and countervailing duties – Undertaking – Invalidation of undertaking invoices – Legal basis – Article 8(9) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 – Article 13(9) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1037 – Implementing Regulations (EU) No 1238/2013 and No 1239/2013 – Implementing Regulations (EU) 2017/367 and 2017/366 – Manifest error of assessment)

RSS
First115116117118120122123124Last
Please edit and save settings.