Vrsta AI: Disclaimer AI Kaj prejmete
AI Davčni Asistent: modro-poslovanje.si

Problemi z davčnim postopkom, vodenje poslovnih? knjig....pridobite nasvet ali ponudbo za vodenje poslovnih knjig ali pomoč pri preoblikovanju podjetja (normiranec, lmet, zavod, d.o.o.....), inšpekcije....
AI Davki/Računovodstvo

Problemi z razumevanjem davkov, prispevkov?....svetovalec potrdi odgovor na vprašanja o DAVKIH - AI modri davčni nasvet pa naredi (Povzetek → Razlaga → Koraki → Viri. in Potrditev odgovora s strani Derganc Franc)
 (Rezervirajte termin pri DAVČNEM SVETOVALCU - mag. Franc Derganc)

Išči

Pravice plačnikov davkov v Sloveniji - TAXPAYERS RIGHTS in SLOVENIA

Spoštovani, vse pravice plačnikov davkov, kot so opisane v tem prispevku, so opredeljene v Ustavi Republike Slovenije (in Listini EU o temeljnih pravicah, Evropski konvenciji za človekove pravice ipd.). Slovenija nima uvedenega Kodeksa pravic plačnikov davkov (in določene pravice udejanja pomanjkljivo), zato je sistematika PPD na našem spletnem mestu urejena po kanadskem modelu. Zato (ker imamo težave na nivoju zakonov in na nivoju izvjanja zakonov) lahko določene pravice (npr. p. do zasebnosti) udejanjamo zgolj na podlagi vložitve pravnih sredstev.

Link: KODEKS ZA PRAVICE PLAČNIKOV DAVKOV ZDSS, ki ga je sprejela Zbornica davčnih svetovalcev Slovenije
s ciljem spodbujanja odločevalcev pri nas, da zberejo pogum in uvedejo Kodeks - tudi za slovenske plačnike davkov.

 

Za funkcionalnost strani
uporabljamo piškotke,
ki ne hranijo osebnih podatkov.

Nekateri piškotki so bili
morda že servirani
v skladu z zakonodajo.

Z nadaljevanjem obiska strani soglašaš z njihovo uporabo.
 Želim več informacij
0 0

CELEX:62020TJ0657_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 22 June 2022.#Ryanair DAC v European Commission.#State aid – Finnish air-transport market – Aid granted by Finland to Finnair in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic – Recapitalisation of an airline by its public and private shareholders on a pro rata basis in proportion to the previously existing ownership structure – Decision not to raise any objections – Temporary Framework for State aid measures – Measure intended to remedy a serious disturbance in the economy of a Member State – Derogation from certain requirements of the temporary framework – No weighing of the beneficial effects of the aid against its adverse effects on trading conditions and the maintenance of undistorted competition – Equ

0 0

CELEX:62020TJ0660: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 20 November 2024.#Zhejiang Beyondsun Green Energy Technology Co. Ltd v European Commission.#Dumping – Subsidies – Imports of crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules and cells originating in or consigned from China – Definitive anti-dumping and countervailing duties – Undertaking – Invalidation of undertaking invoices – Legal basis – Article 8(9) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 – Article 13(9) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1037 – Implementing Regulations (EU) No 1238/2013 and No 1239/2013 – Implementing Regulations (EU) 2017/367 and 2017/366 – Manifest error of assessment.#Case T-660/20.

0 0

CELEX:62020TJ0660_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 20 November 2024.#Zhejiang Beyondsun Green Energy Technology Co. Ltd v European Commission.#Dumping – Subsidies – Imports of crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules and cells originating in or consigned from China – Definitive anti-dumping and countervailing duties – Undertaking – Invalidation of undertaking invoices – Legal basis – Article 8(9) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 – Article 13(9) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1037 – Implementing Regulations (EU) No 1238/2013 and No 1239/2013 – Implementing Regulations (EU) 2017/367 and 2017/366 – Manifest error of assessment.#Case T-660/20.

0 0

CELEX:62020TJ0661: Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 23 March 2022 (Extracts).#NV v European Union Agency for the Operational Management of Large-Scale IT Systems in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice.#Civil service – Members of the temporary staff – Staff of eu-LISA – Disciplinary proceedings – Disciplinary penalty – Reprimand – Implementing provisions concerning administrative inquiries – Plea of illegality – Article 110 of the Staff Regulations – Failure to consult the Staff Committee – Rights of the defence and right to be heard – Articles 12, 12a, 17 and 19 of the Staff Regulations – Error of assessment – Principle of good administration – Article 10 of Annex IX to the Staff Regulations – Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials – Liability – Non-materia

0 0

CELEX:62020TJ0661_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 23 March 2022 (Extracts).#NV v European Union Agency for the Operational Management of Large-Scale IT Systems in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice.#Civil service – Members of the temporary staff – Staff of eu-LISA – Disciplinary proceedings – Disciplinary penalty – Reprimand – Implementing provisions concerning administrative inquiries – Plea of illegality – Article 110 of the Staff Regulations – Failure to consult the Staff Committee – Rights of the defence and right to be heard – Articles 12, 12a, 17 and 19 of the Staff Regulations – Error of assessment – Principle of good administration – Article 10 of Annex IX to the Staff Regulations – Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials – Liability – Non-mat

0 0

CELEX:62020TJ0665_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 9 June 2021.#Ryanair DAC v European Commission.#State aid – German air transport market – Public loan guaranteed by Germany to Condor Flugdienst in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic – Decision not to raise any objections – Aid intended to make good the damage caused by an exceptional occurrence – Article 107(2)(b) TFEU – Assessment of damages – Causal link – Obligation to state reasons – Maintenance of the effects of the decision.#Case T-665/20.

0 0

CELEX:62020TJ0679: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 30 April 2025.#Dr. August Wolff GmbH & Co. KG Arzneimittel v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark Vagisan – Earlier national word marks VAGISIL – Relative ground for invalidity – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union and from Euratom – End of the transition period during the court proceedings.#Case T-679/20.

0 0

CELEX:62020TJ0679_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 30 April 2025.#Dr. August Wolff GmbH & Co. KG Arzneimittel v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark Vagisan – Earlier national word marks VAGISIL – Relative ground for invalidity – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union and from Euratom – End of the transition period during the court proceedings.#Case T-679/20.

0 0

CELEX:62020TJ0692: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 13 November 2024.#Iliad Italia SpA v European Commission.#Competition – Concentrations – Italian market for mobile telecommunication services – Decision declaring the concentration compatible with the internal market – Grouping of passive infrastructure into a joint venture – Commitments entered into during the first phase of examination – Granting of access to the joint venture’s sites – Manifest error of assessment – General terms of the commitments – Protection against a risk of bias when selecting sites – Implementation of commitments.#Case T-692/20.

0 0

CELEX:62020TJ0694_INF:           Arrêt du Tribunal (neuvième chambre) du 2 février 2022.#Maria Alexandra Canisius contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle.#Marque de l’Union européenne – Procédure d’opposition – Demande de marque de l’Union européenne figurative CCLABELLE VIENNA – Marque de l’Union européenne verbale antérieure LABELLO – Motif relatif de refus – Risque de confusion – Article 8, paragraphe 1, sous b), du règlement (UE) 2017/1001.#Affaire T-694/20.

This document does not exist in English.
0 0

CELEX:62020TJ0699: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 21 December 2021.#Fashion Energy Srl v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark 1st AMERICAN – Earlier EU figurative mark representing an eagle or other bird of prey – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Phonetic similarity of the signs – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Article 72(6) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-699/20.

0 0

CELEX:62020TJ0699_INF:           Arrêt du Tribunal (sixième chambre) du 21 décembre 2021.#Fashion Energy Srl contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle.#Marque de l’Union européenne – Procédure d’opposition – Demande de marque de l’Union européenne figurative 1st AMERICAN – Marque de l’Union européenne figurative antérieure représentant un aigle ou autre oiseau de proie – Motif relatif de refus – Risque de confusion – Similitude des signes sur le plan phonétique – Article 8, paragraphe 1, sous b), du règlement (CE) no 207/2009 [devenu article 8, paragraphe 1, sous b), du règlement (UE) 2017/1001] – Article 72, paragraphe 6, du règlement 2017/1001 – Article 94, paragraphe 1, du règlement 2017/1001.#Affaire T-699/20.

This document does not exist in English.
0 0

CELEX:62020TJ0700_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 1 December 2021.#Gabriele Schmid v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark Steirisches Kürbiskernöl g. g. A GESCHÜTZTE GEOGRAFISCHE ANGABE – Absolute ground for refusal – Trade mark including badges, emblems or escutcheons – Emblem of one of the areas of action of the European Union – Protected geographical indications – Article 7(1)(i) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(i) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-700/20.

RSS
First133134135136138140141142Last
Please edit and save settings.