Išči

Pravice plačnikov davkov v Sloveniji - TAXPAYERS RIGHTS in SLOVENIA

Spoštovani, vse pravice plačnikov davkov, kot so opisane v tem prispevku, so opredeljene v Ustavi Republike Slovenije (in Listini EU o temeljnih pravicah, Evropski konvenciji za človekove pravice ipd.). Slovenija nima uvedenega Kodeksa pravic plačnikov davkov (in določene pravice udejanja pomanjkljivo), zato je sistematika PPD na našem spletnem mestu urejena po kanadskem modelu. Zato (ker imamo težave na nivoju zakonov in na nivoju izvjanja zakonov) lahko določene pravice (npr. p. do zasebnosti) udejanjamo zgolj na podlagi vložitve pravnih sredstev.

Link: KODEKS ZA PRAVICE PLAČNIKOV DAVKOV ZDSS, ki ga je sprejela Zbornica davčnih svetovalcev Slovenije
s ciljem spodbujanja odločevalcev pri nas, da zberejo pogum in uvedejo Kodeks - tudi za slovenske plačnike davkov.

 

Za funkcionalnost strani
uporabljamo piškotke,
ki ne hranijo osebnih podatkov.

Nekateri piškotki so bili
morda že servirani
v skladu z zakonodajo.

Z nadaljevanjem obiska strani soglašaš z njihovo uporabo.
 Želim več informacij
0 0

CELEX:62024TJ0163: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 January 2025.#Rat Pack Filmproduktion GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark RATPAC – Earlier national word mark RAT PACK – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – No similarity of the services – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-163/24.

0 0

CELEX:62024TJ0163_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 January 2025.#Rat Pack Filmproduktion GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark RATPAC – Earlier national word mark RAT PACK – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – No similarity of the services – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-163/24.

0 0

CELEX:62024TJ0167:           Arrêt du Tribunal (cinquième chambre) du 25 février 2026.#DG contre Agence de l’Union européenne pour la coopération des services répressifs et Agence de l’Union européenne pour la coopération judiciaire en matière pénale.#Responsabilité non contractuelle – Coopération des autorités de police et des autres services répressifs des États membres – Prétendu traitement illicite de données à caractère personnel – Méconnaissance des exigences de forme – Article 76, sous d), du règlement de procédure – Irrecevabilité partielle – Article 50 du règlement (UE) 2016/794 – Responsabilité solidaire d’Europol et des États membres du fait de traitements illicites de données – Absence de préjudice moral subi du fait d’Europol.#Affaire T-167/24.

This document does not exist in English.
0 0

CELEX:62024TJ0169: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 October 2025.#PMC Vlissingen Netherlands BV v European Commission.#Environment and protection of human health – Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 – Classification, labelling and packaging of certain substances and mixtures – Delegated Regulation (EU) 2024/197 – Classification and labelling of dibutyltin oxide – Criteria for classification of a substance in the hazard class reproductive toxicity, Category 1B – Absence of public consultation on the opinion of ECHA’s Committee for Risk Assessment – No obligation to review – Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 – Read-across – Maternal toxicity – Manifest error of assessment.#Case T-169/24.

0 0

CELEX:62024TJ0169_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 October 2025.#PMC Vlissingen Netherlands BV v European Commission.#Environment and protection of human health – Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 – Classification, labelling and packaging of certain substances and mixtures – Delegated Regulation (EU) 2024/197 – Classification and labelling of dibutyltin oxide – Criteria for classification of a substance in the hazard class reproductive toxicity, Category 1B – Absence of public consultation on the opinion of ECHA’s Committee for Risk Assessment – No obligation to review – Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 – Read-across – Maternal toxicity – Manifest error of assessment.#Case T-169/24.

0 0

CELEX:62024TJ0173:           Arrêt du Tribunal (quatrième chambre) du 19 novembre 2025.#DI contre Parlement européen.#Droit institutionnel – Membre du Parlement – Harcèlement moral – Décisions de la présidente du Parlement concluant à l’existence d’un harcèlement moral à l’égard d’un assistant parlementaire accrédité et infligeant un blâme à un membre du Parlement – Droits de la défense – Principe de bonne administration – Délais de procédure – Détournement de pouvoir – Notion de “harcèlement” – Article 12 bis du statut – Erreur d’appréciation.#Affaire T-173/24.

This document does not exist in English.
0 0

CELEX:62024TJ0174: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 21 January 2026.#Djchem Chemicals Poland S.A. and The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company v European Commission.#Environment and protection of human health – Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 – Classification, labelling and packaging of certain substances and certain mixtures – Delegated Regulation (EU) 2024/197 – Classification and labelling of 1,4-Benzenediamine, N,N’-mixed Ph and tolyl derivs. – Criteria for classification of a substance in the hazard class reproductive toxicity category 1B – Multi-constituent substance – Relevance of adverse effects in humans – Read-across – Manifest errors of assessment – Equal treatment – Proportionality – Rights of the defence.#Case T-174/24.

0 0

CELEX:62024TJ0174_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 21 January 2026.#Djchem Chemicals Poland S.A. and The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company v European Commission.#Environment and protection of human health – Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 – Classification, labelling and packaging of certain substances and certain mixtures – Delegated Regulation (EU) 2024/197 – Classification and labelling of 1,4-Benzenediamine, N,N’-mixed Ph and tolyl derivs. – Criteria for classification of a substance in the hazard class reproductive toxicity category 1B – Multi-constituent substance – Relevance of adverse effects in humans – Read-across – Manifest errors of assessment – Equal treatment – Proportionality – Rights of the defence.#Case T-174/24.

0 0

CELEX:62024TJ0176: Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 14 January 2026.#Feras Al Akhras v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Syria – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources and subject to restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists – ‘Family membership’ criterion – Criterion of ‘association with members of the Assad or Makhlouf families’ – Plea of illegality – Obligation to state reasons – Communication of the restrictive measures – Error of assessment – Proportionality – F

0 0

CELEX:62024TJ0176_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 14 January 2026.#Feras Al Akhras v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Syria – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources and subject to restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists – ‘Family membership’ criterion – Criterion of ‘association with members of the Assad or Makhlouf families’ – Plea of illegality – Obligation to state reasons – Communication of the restrictive measures – Error of assessment – Proportionality

0 0

CELEX:62024TJ0185: Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber, Extended Composition) of 6 May 2026.#Novis Insurance Company, Novis Versicherungsgesellschaft, Novis Compagnia di Assicurazioni, Novis Poisťovňa a.s. v European Commission.#Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Documents exchanged in the course of an investigation procedure under Article 17 of Regulation (EU) No 1094/2010 in respect of a breach of EU law – Refusal of access – Exception relating to protection of the purpose of investigations – Obligation to state reasons – General presumption of confidentiality – Obligation to undertake a specific and individual examination – Overriding public interest – Principle of proportionality – Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights.#Case T-185/24.

0 0

CELEX:62024TJ0185_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber, Extended Composition) of 6 May 2026.#Novis Insurance Company, Novis Versicherungsgesellschaft, Novis Compagnia di Assicurazioni, Novis Poisťovňa a.s. v European Commission.#Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Documents exchanged in the course of an investigation procedure under Article 17 of Regulation (EU) No 1094/2010 in respect of a breach of EU law – Refusal of access – Exception relating to protection of the purpose of investigations – Obligation to state reasons – General presumption of confidentiality – Obligation to undertake a specific and individual examination – Overriding public interest – Principle of proportionality – Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights.#Case T-185/24.

0 0

CELEX:62024TJ0187_INF:           Arrêt du Tribunal (septième chambre) du 12 février 2025.#Biif Srl contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle.#Marque de l’Union européenne – Procédure d’opposition – Demande de marque de l’Union européenne figurative CAPRIZZA – Marque de l’Union européenne figurative antérieure capizzi GASTROPIZZA – Motif relatif de refus – Risque de confusion – Similitude des services – Similitudes des signes – Article 8, paragraphe 1, sous b), du règlement (UE) 2017/1001.#Affaire T-187/24.

This document does not exist in English.
0 0

CELEX:62024TJ0188:           Arrêt du Tribunal (deuxième chambre) du 9 juillet 2025.#Compagnie générale des établissements Michelin contre Commission européenne.#Concurrence – Ententes – Procédure administrative – Décision ordonnant une inspection – Article 20, paragraphe 4, du règlement (CE) no 1/2003 – Objet et but de l’inspection – Obligation de motivation – Indices suffisamment sérieux – Protection de la vie privée – Contrôle juridictionnel.#Affaire T-188/24.

This document does not exist in English.
RSS
First725726727728730732733734Last
Please edit and save settings.