Išči

Sodna praksa Sodišča EU, lastni članki, spremembe davčne zakonodaje....

Izbrani prispeveki - novice o davkih pri nas in v EU - NEWS about TAXES

V družbi TAXIN d.o.o. (mag. Franc Derganc), partnerici Mreže Modro Poslovanje preučujemo davčno-pravna in druga poslovno-pravna vprašanja na podlagi študija sodne prakse Sodišča EU in slovenskih sodišč, preučevati moramo pravne predpise EU in domače pravne predpise ter spremljamo "potrebe" strank - podjetij, ki delujejo v Republiki Sloveniji ter na t.i. mednarodnih trgih. 


Mreža modro poslovanje, na dnevnem nivoju, spremlja spremembe iz spodaj navedenih baz podatkov.

    The partners (TAXIN d.o.o.) of the Wisdom Business Network study tax, legal and other business-legal issues based on the study of the case law of the Court of Justice of the EU and Slovenian courts, they must study EU legal regulations and domestic legal regulations, and they must monitor the needs of customers - companies that operate in the Republic of Slovenia and operate also on the so-called international markets.

The Wisdom business network monitors changes from the databases listed below on a daily basis.


 

CELEX:62021TJ0799_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 27 November 2024.#European Food SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark FITNESS – Absolute grounds for invalidity – Submission of evidence for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Article 95(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-799/21.

July 4, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62024CC0366:           Conclusions de l'avocat général M. M. Szpunar, présentées le 3 juillet 2025.###

This document does not exist in English.
July 4, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62023TJ1134_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 20 November 2024.#Enrique Pich-Aguilera Molins v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark Carmen says – Earlier national figurative mark del Carmen – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Reimbursement of representation costs – Article 109 of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-1134/23.

July 4, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62024CJ0114_RES: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 3 July 2025.#Global Nanotechnologies AE schediasmou anaptyxis paraskevis kai emporias ylikon nanotechnologias (Glonatech) v European Research Executive Agency.#Appeal – Arbitration clause – Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013) – The SANAD project – Staff costs – Eligible costs – Request for recovery – Debit note – Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Principle of good administration – Substitution of grounds – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Right to effective judicial protection – Burden of proof – Proportionality.#Case C-114/24 P.

July 4, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62024TJ0276_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 27 November 2024.#Vino Vintana AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case T-276/24.

July 4, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62024CC0567: Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 3 July 2025.###

July 4, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62024CC0453: Opinion of Advocate General Richard de la Tour delivered on 3 July 2025.###

July 4, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62024TO0324_INF: Order of the President of the General Court of 22 November 2024.#UniCredit SpA v European Central Bank.#Case T-324/24 R.

July 4, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62023TJ1159_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 20 November 2024.#Jacob Cohen Company SpA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case T-1159/23.

July 4, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62024CC0210: Opinion of Advocate General Biondi delivered on 3 July 2025.###

July 4, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62024CC0485: Opinion of Advocate General Norkus delivered on 3 July 2025.###

July 4, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62023CJ0646_RES: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 3 July 2025.#Criminal proceedings against P.B. and R.S.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Rule of law – Independence of the judiciary – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Effective judicial protection in areas covered by EU law – Principle of irremovability of judges – Military judge found unfit for professional military service – National legislation requiring the early retirement of that judge.#Joined Cases C-646/23 and C-661/23.

July 4, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62023CJ0610_RES: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 3 July 2025.#FO v Ypourgos Metanastefsis kai Asylou.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Asylum policy – International protection – Common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection – Directive 2013/32/EU – Article 46 – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 47 – Right to an effective remedy – Requirement of full and ex nunc examination of the appeal – Obligation to appear in person before the authority examining the appeal – Presumption that an appeal has been improperly brought – Dismissal of the appeal as manifestly unfounded without examination of the merits – Principle of proportionality.#Case C-610/23.

July 4, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62022TJ0651_INF: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 4 September 2024.#Kirill Shamalov v Council of the European Union.#Case T-651/22.

July 4, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62023TJ0564_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 20 November 2024.#Republic of Lithuania v European Commission.#Case T-564/23.

July 4, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62023CC0796: Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 3 July 2025.###

July 4, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62024CC0084: Opinion of Advocate General Ćapeta delivered on 3 July 2025.###

July 4, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62024CC0291: Opinion of Advocate General Ćapeta delivered on 3 July 2025.###

July 4, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62024TO0668:           Ordonnance du Tribunal (sixième chambre) du 1er juillet 2025.#Santos SAS contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle.#Recours en annulation – Marque de l’Union européenne – Demande de marque de l’Union européenne tridimensionnelle – Forme d’un presse-agrumes – Motif absolu de refus – Absence de caractère distinctif acquis par l’usage – Article 7, paragraphe 3, du règlement (UE) 2017/1001 – Recours manifestement dépourvu de tout fondement en droit.#Affaire T-668/24.

This document does not exist in English.
July 4, 2025 0 Comments

UPRS Sodba I U 448/2022-12

Iz obrazložitve ne izhaja, katere kriterije je pri določitvi vrednosti nepremičnin upošteval davčni organ, kljub temu da navaja, da je vrednost stavbe odvisna od koristne površine, kvalitete gradnje, starosti in drugih elementov, pri čemer navedenih meril ne aplicira na tožnikove nepremičnine. Odgovor na tožbo je namenjen zgolj izjasnitvi toženke o tožbenih navedbah oziroma podrobnejšemu pojasnjevanju stališč, ki jih je sprejela in obrazložila v izpodbijani odločbi, ne pa saniranju pomanjkljivosti oziroma nezakonitosti izpodbijane odločbe.
July 4, 2025 0 Comments
RSS
First4647484951535455Last