Išči

Pravice plačnikov davkov v Sloveniji - TAXPAYERS RIGHTS in SLOVENIA

Spoštovani, vse pravice plačnikov davkov, kot so opisane v tem prispevku, so opredeljene v Ustavi Republike Slovenije (in Listini EU o temeljnih pravicah, Evropski konvenciji za človekove pravice ipd.). Slovenija nima uvedenega Kodeksa pravic plačnikov davkov (in določene pravice udejanja pomanjkljivo), zato je sistematika PPD na našem spletnem mestu urejena po kanadskem modelu. Zato (ker imamo težave na nivoju zakonov in na nivoju izvjanja zakonov) lahko določene pravice (npr. p. do zasebnosti) udejanjamo zgolj na podlagi vložitve pravnih sredstev.

Link: KODEKS ZA PRAVICE PLAČNIKOV DAVKOV ZDSS, ki ga je sprejela Zbornica davčnih svetovalcev Slovenije
s ciljem spodbujanja odločevalcev pri nas, da zberejo pogum in uvedejo Kodeks - tudi za slovenske plačnike davkov.

 

Za funkcionalnost strani
uporabljamo piškotke,
ki ne hranijo osebnih podatkov.

Nekateri piškotki so bili
morda že servirani
v skladu z zakonodajo.

Z nadaljevanjem obiska strani soglašaš z njihovo uporabo.
 Želim več informacij
0 0

CELEX:62024TB0367: Case T-367/24 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 11 October 2024 – Evroins inshurans grup v EIOPA (Interim relief – European System of Financial Supervisors – Mechanism enabling EIOPA to deal with breaches of EU law by the national authorities in their supervisory activities – Decision not to open an investigation – Refusal of a request not to publish a decision – Application for suspension of operation of a measure – Failure to comply with procedural requirements – Inadmissibility)

0 0

CELEX:62024TB0374: Case T-374/24: Order of the General Court of 20 May 2025 – AirPlus International v EUIPO – Comeig Ramírez (R+ CASHLAB) (Action for annulment – EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark R+ CASHLAB – Earlier EU word marks AirPlus International, AirPlus Connect and AirPlus Travel Expense Card and earlier EU figurative mark AirPlus INTERNATIONAL – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Examination of the facts of EUIPO’s own motion – Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Well-known facts – Refusal of the request for oral proceedings before the Board of Appeal – Article 96(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Acti

0 0

CELEX:62024TB0379: Case T-379/24: Order of the General Court of 11 June 2025 – MSG Frucht v EUIPO (Götterfrucht) (EU trade mark – Application for the EU word mark Götterfrucht – Absolute grounds for refusal – No distinctive character – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – No recourse to oral proceedings before the Board of Appeal – Article 96(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

0 0

CELEX:62024TB0443: Case T-443/24: Order of the General Court of 17 July 2025 – ECE Group v EUIPO – ECE Logistics (ECE LOGISTICS) (EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark ECE LOGISTICS – International registration designating the European Union of the earlier figurative mark ECE – Earlier EU word mark ECE – Earlier national word mark ECE Logistics – Relative ground for invalidity – No likelihood of confusion – No similarity between the goods and services – Article 8(1)(b) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

0 0

CELEX:62024TB0446: Case T-446/24 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 25 November 2024 – EV and Others v Council (Interim relief – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine – Prohibition on providing access to ports and to locks in the territory of the European Union to any vessel registered under the flag of Russia, including replicas of historical ships – Application for interim measures – Failure to comply with procedural requirements – Inadmissibility)

0 0

CELEX:62024TB0468: Case T-468/24: Order of the General Court of 10 February 2025 – FB v Parliament (Civil service – Officials – Surviving spouse – Survivor’s pension – Refusal to grant – Article 17 of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations – Conditions for eligibility – Duration of the marriage – Force majeure – Non-discrimination – Proportionality – Principle of sound administration – Duty to have regard for the welfare of staff – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

0 0

CELEX:62024TB0479: Case T-479/24 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 25 November 2024 – Edukacja, Nauka, Kultura v REA (Interim relief – Research and technological development – Grant agreement entered into as part of the Horizon 2020 Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2014-2020) – Request for reimbursement of ineligible costs – Application for suspension of operation of a measure – Failure to comply with procedural requirements – Inadmissibility)

0 0

CELEX:62024TB0484: Case T-484/24: Order of the General Court of 26 June 2025 – FF v Eurojust and Europol (Sky ECC III) (Non-contractual liability – Cooperation of the police authorities and other law enforcement agencies of the Member States – Alleged unlawful processing of personal data – Failure to comply with procedural requirements – Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure – No non-material damage suffered as a result of acts of Europol – Action in part brought before a court manifestly lacking jurisdiction to hear and determine it, in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

RSS
First655656657658660662663664Last
Please edit and save settings.