Vrsta AI: Disclaimer AI Kaj prejmete
AI Davčni Asistent: modro-poslovanje.si

Problemi z davčnim postopkom, vodenje poslovnih? knjig....pridobite nasvet ali ponudbo za vodenje poslovnih knjig ali pomoč pri preoblikovanju podjetja (normiranec, lmet, zavod, d.o.o.....), inšpekcije....

AI Davki/Računovodstvo

Problemi z razumevanjem davkov, prispevkov?....svetovalec potrdi odgovor na vprašanja o DAVKIH - AI modri davčni nasvet pa naredi (Povzetek → Razlaga → Koraki → Viri. in Potrditev odgovora s strani Derganc Franc)

 (Rezervirajte termin pri DAVČNEM SVETOVALCU - mag. Franc Derganc)

Išči

Sodna praksa Sodišča EU, lastni članki, spremembe davčne zakonodaje....

Izbrani prispeveki - novice o davkih pri nas in v EU - NEWS about TAXES

V družbi TAXIN d.o.o. (mag. Franc Derganc), partnerici Mreže Modro Poslovanje preučujemo davčno-pravna in druga poslovno-pravna vprašanja na podlagi študija sodne prakse Sodišča EU in slovenskih sodišč, preučevati moramo pravne predpise EU in domače pravne predpise ter spremljamo "potrebe" strank - podjetij, ki delujejo v Republiki Sloveniji ter na t.i. mednarodnih trgih. 


Mreža modro poslovanje, na dnevnem nivoju, spremlja spremembe iz spodaj navedenih baz podatkov.

   The partners (TAXIN d.o.o.) of the Wisdom Business Network study tax, legal and other business-legal issues based on the study of the case law of the Court of Justice of the EU and Slovenian courts, they must study EU legal regulations and domestic legal regulations, and they must monitor the needs of customers - companies that operate in the Republic of Slovenia and operate also on the so-called international markets.

The Wisdom business network monitors changes from the databases listed below on a daily basis.


 

CELEX:62023CA0492: Case C-492/23, Russmedia Digital and Inform Media Press: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 2 December 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Cluj – Romania) – X v Russmedia Digital SRL, Inform Media Press SRL (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 4(7) – Concept of controller – Responsibility of the operator of an online marketplace for the publication of personal data contained in advertisements placed on its online marketplace by user advertisers – Article 5(2) – Principle of accountability – Article 26 – Joint control with user advertisers – Article 9(1) and (2)(a) – Advertisements containing sensitive data – Lawfulness of processing – Consent – Articles 24, 25 and 32 – Obli

February 9, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62025CN0669: Case C-669/25, Bujoian: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Iași (Romania) lodged on 14 October 2025 – XX v Agenția Națională de Integritate

February 9, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62025CN0641: Case C-641/25, Łęko: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie (Poland) lodged on 1 October 2025 – Bank BPH S.A v AKS and BS

February 9, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62025TN0849: Case T-849/25: Action brought on 10 December 2025 – Excursus v EUIPO – Bigfinite (AIZOON)

February 9, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62025CN0575: Case C-575/25, Van Den Bosch Transport: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Gerechtshof Amsterdam (Netherlands) lodged on 2 September 2025 – Van Den Bosch Transport KFT v Respondents

February 9, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62025TN0793: Case T-793/25: Action brought on 19 November 2025 – OD v Eurojust

February 9, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62025TN0865: Case T-865/25: Action brought on 17 December 2025 – Europäisch-Iranische Handelsbank v Council

February 9, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62024CA0485: Case C-485/24, Locatrans: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 11 December 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation – France) – Locatrans Sàrl v ES (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Rome Convention on the law applicable to contractual obligations – Article 6 – Contract of employment – Choice made by the parties – Mandatory rules of the law which would be applicable in the absence of choice – Determination of the law applicable – Habitual place of work – Change of habitual place of work in the course of the employment relationship – Contract of employment more closely connected with another country – Criteria for assessment – Account to be taken of the most recent habitual place of work)

February 9, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62025TN0787: Case T-787/25: Action brought on 10 November 2025 – Baur v Commission

February 9, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62025TN0840: Case T-840/25: Action brought on 6 December 2025 – Łosowski v EUIPO – Skawiński and Tkaczyk (kombii)

February 9, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:32025D1495R(01):           Berichtigung des Beschlusses (GASP) 2025/1495 des Rates vom 18. Juli 2025 zur Änderung des Beschlusses 2014/512/GASP über restriktive Maßnahmen angesichts der Handlungen Russlands, die die Lage in der Ukraine destabilisieren (ABl. L, 2025/1495, 19.7.2025)

The corrigendum does not concern the English version.
February 9, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:32014D0512R(05)

The corrigendum does not concern the English version.
February 9, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:32026D00866: Decision No 2/2026 of the Secretary-General of the Council of the European Union of 30 January 2026 laying down implementing rules concerning the application of Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 of the European Parliament and of the Council and the restriction of data subjects’ rights for the purpose of restrictive measures

February 9, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:32025R2509R(01):           Berichtigung der Verordnung (EU) 2025/2509 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 26. November 2025 über die Sicherheit von Spielzeug und zur Aufhebung der Richtlinie 2009/48/EG (ABl. L, 2025/2509, 12.12.2025)

The corrigendum does not concern the English version.
February 9, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:32002R0006R(18):           Rectificatif au règlement (CE) n° 6/2002 du Conseil du 12 décembre 2001 sur les dessins ou modèles communautaires (JO L 3 du 5.1.2002)

The corrigendum does not concern the English version.
February 9, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62025TJ0009_INF:           Arrêt du Tribunal (huitième chambre) du 14 janvier 2026.#Kct GmbH & Co. KG contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle.#Marque de l’Union européenne – Demande de marque de l’Union européenne consistant dans le mouvement d’une fenêtre rabattable – Motif absolu de refus – Signe constitué exclusivement par une caractéristique du produit nécessaire à l’obtention d’un résultat technique – Article 7, paragraphe 1, sous e), ii), du règlement (UE) 2017/1001.#Affaire T-9/25.

This document does not exist in English.
February 7, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62024TJ0176_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 14 January 2026.#Feras Al Akhras v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Syria – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources and subject to restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists – ‘Family membership’ criterion – Criterion of ‘association with members of the Assad or Makhlouf families’ – Plea of illegality – Obligation to state reasons – Communication of the restrictive measures – Error of assessment – Proportionality

February 7, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62025TJ0140_INF:           Arrêt du Tribunal (huitième chambre) du 14 janvier 2026.#Variuscard Produktions- und Handels GmbH contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle.#Marque de l’Union européenne – Demande de marque de l’Union européenne verbale CRYPTOSTAMP – Motif absolu de refus – Caractère descriptif – Article 7, paragraphe 1, sous c), du règlement (UE) 2017/1001 – Égalité de traitement – Principe de bonne administration.#Affaire T-140/25.

This document does not exist in English.
February 7, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62019TJ0384(01)_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 10 September 2025.#European Parliament v Axa Assurances Luxembourg SA and Others.#Case T-384/19 OP.

February 7, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62024TO0571_INF: Order of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 19 January 2026.#Pic Corp. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark PIC – Earlier EU word mark PIC – Relative ground for invalidity – Genuine use of the earlier mark – Article 64(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Admissibility of new evidence – Relevant periods – Article 95(2) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Article 27(4) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 – Evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Discretion of the Board of Appeal – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-571/24.

February 7, 2026 0 Comments
RSS
First2122232426282930Last