Vrsta AI: Disclaimer AI Kaj prejmete
AI Davčni Asistent: modro-poslovanje.si

Problemi z davčnim postopkom, vodenje poslovnih? knjig....pridobite nasvet ali ponudbo za vodenje poslovnih knjig ali pomoč pri preoblikovanju podjetja (normiranec, lmet, zavod, d.o.o.....), inšpekcije....
AI Davki/Računovodstvo

Problemi z razumevanjem davkov, prispevkov?....svetovalec potrdi odgovor na vprašanja o DAVKIH - AI modri davčni nasvet pa naredi (Povzetek → Razlaga → Koraki → Viri. in Potrditev odgovora s strani Derganc Franc)
 (Rezervirajte termin pri DAVČNEM SVETOVALCU - mag. Franc Derganc)

Išči

Sodna praksa Sodišča EU, lastni članki, spremembe davčne zakonodaje....

Izbrani prispeveki - novice o davkih pri nas in v EU - NEWS about TAXES

V družbi TAXIN d.o.o. (mag. Franc Derganc), partnerici Mreže Modro Poslovanje preučujemo davčno-pravna in druga poslovno-pravna vprašanja na podlagi študija sodne prakse Sodišča EU in slovenskih sodišč, preučevati moramo pravne predpise EU in domače pravne predpise ter spremljamo "potrebe" strank - podjetij, ki delujejo v Republiki Sloveniji ter na t.i. mednarodnih trgih. 


Mreža modro poslovanje, na dnevnem nivoju, spremlja spremembe iz spodaj navedenih baz podatkov.

    The partners (TAXIN d.o.o.) of the Wisdom Business Network study tax, legal and other business-legal issues based on the study of the case law of the Court of Justice of the EU and Slovenian courts, they must study EU legal regulations and domestic legal regulations, and they must monitor the needs of customers - companies that operate in the Republic of Slovenia and operate also on the so-called international markets.

The Wisdom business network monitors changes from the databases listed below on a daily basis.


 

CELEX:62025TJ0229: Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 14 January 2026.#Ionfarma, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark DESMOMED – Prior national word mark DERMOMED – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – No similarity between the goods at issue – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-229/25.

January 14, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62025TJ0117:           Arrêt du Tribunal (première chambre) du 14 janvier 2026.#Atlas Invest BV contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle.#Marque de l’Union européenne – Demande de marque de l’Union européenne figurative BioTechUSA – Motif absolu de refus – Caractère descriptif – Article 7, paragraphe 1, sous c), du règlement (UE) 2017/1001 – Obligation de motivation – Article 94, paragraphe 1, du règlement 2017/1001.#Affaire T-117/25.

This document does not exist in English.
January 14, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62024TJ0176: Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 14 January 2026.#Feras Al Akhras v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Syria – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources and subject to restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists – ‘Family membership’ criterion – Criterion of ‘association with members of the Assad or Makhlouf families’ – Plea of illegality – Obligation to state reasons – Communication of the restrictive measures – Error of assessment – Proportionality – F

January 14, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62024TJ0371_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 10 September 2025.#La Superquímica, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark Monta – Earlier national figurative mark MONTACK – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-371/24.

January 14, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62024TJ0238_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 24 September 2025.#Bogoljub Karić v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Belarus and the involvement of Belarus in the Russian aggression against Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on admission to the territory of the Member States – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources or to restrictions on admission to the territory of the Member States – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Obligation to state reasons – Error of assessment.#Case T-238/24.

January 14, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62024TJ0619: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 14 January 2026.#Kimpton Hotel & Restaurant Group LLC v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Applications for the EU word marks Kimkom and Kimsum – Earlier EU word mark KIMPTON – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Similarity of the services – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-619/24.

January 14, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62024TO0568_INF: Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 25 September 2025.#VTB Bank PAO v European Central Bank.#Case T-568/24.

January 14, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62023TJ1154_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 14 May 2025.#Taxolutions BV v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark TAXMARC – Earlier EU figurative mark X TAXMAN – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Relevant public – Conceptual similarity.#Case T-1154/23.

January 14, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62025TJ0064: Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 14 January 2026.#Lisa Leone and Others v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark Leone – Relative ground for invalidity – Right to an earlier name under Austrian law – Article 60(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-64/25.

January 14, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62025TJ0009:           Urteil des Gerichts (Achte Kammer) vom 14. Januar 2026.#Kct GmbH & Co. KG gegen Amt der Europäischen Union für geistiges Eigentum.#Unionsmarke – Anmeldung einer Unionsmarke, die aus der Bewegung eines Klappfensters besteht – Absolutes Eintragungshindernis – Zeichen, das ausschließlich aus einem charakteristischen Merkmal der Ware besteht, das zur Erreichung einer technischen Wirkung erforderlich ist – Art. 7 Abs. 1 Buchst. e Ziff. ii der Verordnung (EU) 2017/1001.#Rechtssache T-9/25.

This document does not exist in English.
January 14, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62024TJ0549:           Urteil des Gerichts (Erste Kammer) vom 14. Januar 2026.#Schönegger Käse-Alm GmbH gegen Amt der Europäischen Union für geistiges Eigentum.#Unionsmarke – Verfahren zur Erklärung des Verfalls – Unionswortmarke Rebell – Erklärung des teilweisen Verfalls – Entscheidung, die nach Aufhebung einer früheren Entscheidung durch das Gericht ergangen ist – Art. 72 Abs. 6 der Verordnung (EU) 2017/1001 – Unterbrechung des Verfahrens – Art. 106 Abs. 1 Buchst. b der Verordnung 2017/1001 – Wiederaufnahme des Verfahrens – Art. 72 Abs. 1 der Delegierten Verordnung (EU) 2018/625 – Antrag auf Erklärung des Verfalls – Art. 63 Abs. 1 der Verordnung 2017/1001 – Zustellung an Vertreter – Art. 60 Abs. 1 der Delegierten Verordnung 2018/625.#Rechtssache T-549/24.

This document does not exist in English.
January 14, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62024TJ0403:           Arrêt du Tribunal (cinquième chambre) du 14 janvier 2026.#Issam Anbouba contre Conseil de l'Union européenne.#Politique étrangère et de sécurité commune – Mesures restrictives prises en raison de la situation en Syrie – Gel des fonds – Restrictions en matière d’admission sur le territoire des États membres – Listes des personnes, des entités et des organismes auxquels s’applique le gel des fonds et des ressources économiques et faisant l’objet de restrictions en matière d’admission sur le territoire des États membres – Maintien du nom du requérant sur les listes – Critère de la “femme ou de l’homme d’affaires influent exerçant ses activités en Syrie” – Présomption de lien avec le régime syrien – Chute du régime de Bachar al-Assad – Erreur d’appréciation – Obli

This document does not exist in English.
January 14, 2026 0 Comments

Vpogled v podatke za odmero dohodnine za leto 2025

15.1.2026 bodo izplačevalcem v eDavkih na voljo vpogledi v podatke za odmero dohodnine, sestavljeni na podlagi individualnih podatkov v REK obrazcih z datumom izplačila od 1. 1. 2025 do 31. 12. 2025. 

Podatki so namenjeni izplačevalcem za primerjavo podatkov iz predloženih individualnih REK (iREK) obrazcev in pripravljenimi obvestili prejemnikom dohodkov v obdobju od 1. 1. 2025 do 31. 12. 2025. Vključeni bodo REK obrazci, ki so bili z navedenim kriterijem datuma izplačila finančni upravi predloženi do vključno 12. 1. 2026. 

Podatki bodo izplačevalcem na vpogled do 2. 2. 2026. Če izplačevalec na podlagi navedene primerjave ugotovi, da podatki, ki jih je predložil na iREK obrazcih, niso pravilni, mora predložiti manjkajoče REK obrazce oziroma popravke že vloženih REK obrazcev, in sicer prek sistema eDavki najkasneje do 2. 2. 2026. Podatki predloženi po tem datumu ne bodo upoštevani pri sestavitvi informativnega izračuna dohodnine.
 

January 14, 2026 0 Comments

Možnosti diagonalne kumulacije v pan-evro-mediteranskem (PEM) območju od 1. 1. 2026 dalje

Možnosti diagonalne kumulacije v pan-evro-mediteranskem (PEM) območju od 1. 1. 2026 dalje  

January 14, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:32026D0106: Council Decision (EU) 2026/106 of 18 September 2025 on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union within the Joint Committee established by the Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Moldova on the Carriage of Freight by Road, as regards the continuation of the Agreement

January 14, 2026 0 Comments

Obveznost za plačilo razlike trošarine ob zvišanju DPC drobno rezanega tobaka in cigaret 19. 1. 2026

Zaradi navedenega  osebe, ki imajo drobno rezani tobak in cigarete na zalogi zunaj trošarinskih skladišč, evidentirajo količino drobno rezanega tobaka in cigaret, ki jih imajo na zalogi, ter obračunajo razliko trošarine. Podatke o zalogi drobno rezanega tobaka in cigaret predložijo na obrazcu »Obračun razlike trošarine za drobno rezani tobak in cigarete« (v nadaljevanju Obračun TRO-RAZ), ki je objavljen na spletni strani Finančne uprave RS. Trošarina se plača najpozneje 60. dan po opravljenem popisu. Trošarina se plača, če je znesek trošarine iz obračuna višji od 10 evrov.V zvezi z navedenim vas obveščamo, da se bodo 19. 1. 2026 zvišale cene drobno rezanega tobaka in cigaret navedenih v Obračunu TRO-RAZ, z dne 18. 1. 2026, ki se nahaja v prilogi tega obvestila. Razpredelnici s staro in novo DPC drobno rezanega tobaka (Seznam drobnoprodajnih cen drobno rezanega tobaka) in cigaret (Seznam drobnoprodajnih cen cigaret) se nahajata na spletni strani FURS.Glede na navedeno, morajo zavezanci evidentirati količino omenjenega drobno rezanega tobaka in cigaret, ki jih imajo na zalogi, na Obračunu TRO-RAZ na dan 18. 1. 2026. Ustrezno izpolnjen Obračun TRO-RAZ, z dne 18. 1. 2026, se pristojnemu finančnemu uradu predloži do 2. 2. 2026. Obveznost za plačilo razlike trošarine za znesek, ki je višji od 10 evrov, je potrebno poravnati do 19. 3. 2026. Plačilo se izvrši v dobro podračuna št. SI5601100-8881000030 – prehodni davčni podračun (PDP) države. Poleg številke vplačilnega računa se na plačilnem nalogu obvezno navede tudi številko sklica, ki je določena z modelom 19 v obliki: oznaka modela 19, sklic (davčna številka plačnika – 29009).Obračun TRO-RAZ se predloži FURS po elektronski poti preko informacijskega sistema E-TROD. Dostop do IS E-TROD je urejen preko portala e-Davki. Za pomoč pri predložitvi in izpolnitvi Obračuna TRO-RAZ preko informacijskega sistema E-TROD prilagamo pripomoček in navodila, ki se nahajajo v prilogi tega obvestila, ter so na voljo tudi v okviru...
January 13, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62024CJ0452_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 August 2025.#Lunapark Scandinavia Oy Ltd v Hardeco Finland Oy.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein oikeus.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Trade marks – Directive (EU) 2015/2436 – Article 10 – Exclusive rights of the proprietor of a registered trade mark to oppose the use, by a third party, of a sign which is identical with, or similar to, that mark – Infringement action – Limitations of the exclusive rights of the proprietor of that trade mark – Article 9 and Article 18(1) – Preclusion due to acquiescence – Exhaustive nature of the conditions under which that preclusion can arise – Inapplicability of a general principle of national law that provides for preclusion of the right to prohibit the use of a si

January 13, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62025CO0137_INF: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 10 November 2025.#J.F. and P.F. v Bank BPH S.A.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie.#Case C-137/25.

January 13, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62024CJ0365_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 10 July 2025.#Purefun Group AB v Doggy AB.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Svea hovrätt, Patent- och marknadsöverdomstolen.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Trade marks – Directive (EU) 2015/2436 – Free movement of goods – Articles 34 and 36 TFEU – Trade name – Company name – National legislation conferring an exclusive right on the proprietor of a company name.#Case C-365/24.

January 13, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62024CJ0512_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 1 August 2025.#BÁV Zrt. v Budapest Főváros Kormányhivatala.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH Regulation) – Registration, evaluation and authorisation of chemicals – Annex XVII – Restrictions on the manufacture, placing on the market and use of certain dangerous substances, mixtures and articles – Restrictions concerning cadmium – Maximum concentration in metal parts of jewellery and imitation jewellery articles and hair accessories – Derogation – Silver bracelet dating from the 1940s, the brazing of which contains cadmium.#Case C-512/24.

January 13, 2026 0 Comments
RSS
1345678910Last