Išči

Pravice plačnikov davkov v Sloveniji - TAXPAYERS RIGHTS in SLOVENIA

Spoštovani, vse pravice plačnikov davkov, kot so opisane v tem prispevku, so opredeljene v Ustavi Republike Slovenije (in Listini EU o temeljnih pravicah, Evropski konvenciji za človekove pravice ipd.). Slovenija nima uvedenega Kodeksa pravic plačnikov davkov (in določene pravice udejanja pomanjkljivo), zato je sistematika PPD na našem spletnem mestu urejena po kanadskem modelu. Zato (ker imamo težave na nivoju zakonov in na nivoju izvjanja zakonov) lahko določene pravice (npr. p. do zasebnosti) udejanjamo zgolj na podlagi vložitve pravnih sredstev.

Link: KODEKS ZA PRAVICE PLAČNIKOV DAVKOV ZDSS, ki ga je sprejela Zbornica davčnih svetovalcev Slovenije
s ciljem spodbujanja odločevalcev pri nas, da zberejo pogum in uvedejo Kodeks - tudi za slovenske plačnike davkov.

 

Za funkcionalnost strani
uporabljamo piškotke,
ki ne hranijo osebnih podatkov.

Nekateri piškotki so bili
morda že servirani
v skladu z zakonodajo.

Z nadaljevanjem obiska strani soglašaš z njihovo uporabo.
 Želim več informacij
0 0

CELEX:62023TA0167: Case T-167/23: Judgment of the General Court of 9 July 2025 – LAT Nitrogen Piesteritz and Cornerstone v ECHA (Melamine) (REACH – Substances of very high concern – Establishment of a candidate list for eventual inclusion in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 – Decision identifying melamine as a substance meeting the criteria laid down for inclusion in the list – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Ultra vires – Article 57 of Regulation No 1907/2006 – Manifest error of assessment – Proportionality – Precautionary principle – Misuse of powers)

0 0

CELEX:62023TA0173: Case T-173/23: Judgment of the General Court of 31 January 2024 — Simpson Performance Products v EUIPO — Freundlieb (BANDIT) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark BANDIT — Earlier non-registered word mark BANDIT — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Article 2(2)(g) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 — Identification of the goods and services on which the opposition is based)

0 0

CELEX:62023TA0176: Case T-176/23: Judgment of the General Court of 2 July 2025 – PT Musim Mas v Commission (Commercial policy – Dumping – Imports of fatty acid originating in Indonesia – Definitive anti-dumping duty – Article 9(1) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 – Continuation of the investigation after withdrawal of the complaint – Article 2(3) and (6) of Regulation 2016/1036 – Constructed normal value – Article 9(4) of Regulation 2016/1036 – Article 21(1) of Regulation 2016/1036 – Union interest analysis – Manifest error of assessment – Error of law)

0 0

CELEX:62023TA0178: Case T-178/23: Judgment of the General Court of 29 January 2025 – Ben Ali v Council (Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Tunisia – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Concepts of persons responsible for misappropriation of Tunisian State funds and natural or legal persons or entities associated with those responsible for misappropriation of Tunisian State funds – New plea – Obligation to state reasons – Freedom to conduct a business – Right to work)

0 0

CELEX:62023TA0179: Case T-179/23: Judgment of the General Court of 11 December 2024 – FFPE, Council section v Council (Law governing the institutions – Agreement concluded between the Council and trade union or professional organisations for the implementation of Article 10c of the Staff Regulations – Procedure for verifying the criteria for the recognition and representativeness of trade union or professional organisations – Note providing information about the outcome of the verification procedure – Obligation to state reasons – Principle of good administration – Principle of performance in good faith – Freedom of association)

0 0

CELEX:62023TA0183: Case T-183/23: Judgment of the General Court of 16 July 2025 – Ballmann v European Data Protection Board (Protection of personal data – Complaint against the controller of personal data of users of an online social network in the European Union – Article 65(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Binding decision of the European Data Protection Board – Complainant’s request for access to the file prepared for the purposes of the binding decision – Refusal to grant access – Action for annulment – Actionable measure – Admissibility – Article 41(2)(b) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights)

0 0

CELEX:62023TA0187: Case T-187/23: Judgment of the General Court of 2 July 2025 – PT Permata Hijau Palm Oleo and PT Nubika Jaya v Commission (Commercial policy – Dumping – Imports of fatty acid originating in Indonesia – Definitive anti-dumping duty – Article 17(3) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 – Request for individual examination – Unduly burdensome – Article 9(1) of Regulation 2016/1036 – Continuation of the investigation after withdrawal of the complaint – Article 3(2) of Regulation 2016/1036 – Article 9(2) and (4) of Regulation 2016/1036 – Injury analysis – Article 21(1) of Regulation 2016/1036 – Union interest analysis – Manifest error of assessment – Error of law)

0 0

CELEX:62023TA0188: Case T-188/23: Judgment of the General Court of 31 January 2024 — IU Internationale Hochschule v EUIPO (IU International University of Applied Sciences) (EU trade mark — International registration designating the European Union — Word mark IU International University of Applied Sciences — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Obligation to state reasons — Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001)

0 0

CELEX:62023TA0192: Case T-192/23: Judgment of the General Court of 26 June 2024 – Peikko Group v EUIPO – Anstar (Shape of metal beams for construction) (EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – Three-dimensional EU trade mark – Shape of metal beams for construction – Absolute ground for invalidity – Sign consisting exclusively of the shape of the product necessary to obtain a technical result – Article 7(1)(e)(ii) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Lack of essential non-functional characteristics)

0 0

CELEX:62023TA0193: Case T-193/23: Judgment of the General Court of 15 January 2025 – MegaFon v Council (Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to restrictive measures – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists – Right to be heard – Obligation to state reasons – Error of assessment – Proportionality – Freedom to conduct a business – Action for annulment)

0 0

CELEX:62023TA0194: Case T-194/23: Judgment of the General Court of 16 October 2024 – Fractal Analytics v EUIPO – Fractalia Remote Systems (FRACTALIA) (EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU figurative mark FRACTALIA – Genuine use of the trade mark – Article 18(1) and (2) and Article 58(1)(a) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Article 27(4) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 – Nature of use – Assessment of the evidence – Comparison between the subcategories of services used and the specification of the services covered by the trade mark)

0 0

CELEX:62023TA0201: Case T-201/23: Judgment of the General Court of 16 October 2024 – CRA v Council (Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Iran – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion of the applicant’s name on the list – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Right to effective judicial protection – Proportionality – Misuse of powers)

0 0

CELEX:62023TA0202: Case T-202/23: Judgment of the General Court of 30 April 2025 – Kivikoski and Others v Council (Civil service – Officials – Promotion – 2022 promotion exercise – Decision not to promote the applicant to grade AST 8 – Action for annulment – Interest in bringing proceedings – Demonstration of the prospect of promotion – Admissibility – Article 6(2) of the Staff Regulations – Guiding multiplication rates – Article 45(1) of the Staff Regulations – Comparison of merits)

0 0

CELEX:62023TA0211: Case T-211/23: Judgment of the General Court of 16 October 2024 – Fractal Analytics v EUIPO – Fractalia Remote Systems (FRACTALIA Remote Systems) (EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU figurative mark FRACTALIA Remote Systems – Genuine use of the mark – Article 18(1) and (2) and Article 58(1)(a) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Article 27(4) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 – Nature of use – Assessment of evidence – Comparison of the subcategories of services used and the specification of the services covered by the mark)

RSS
First545546547548550552553554Last
Please edit and save settings.