Išči

Sodna praksa Sodišča EU, lastni članki, spremembe davčne zakonodaje....

Izbrani prispeveki - novice o davkih pri nas in v EU - NEWS about TAXES

V družbi TAXIN d.o.o. (mag. Franc Derganc), partnerici Mreže Modro Poslovanje preučujemo davčno-pravna in druga poslovno-pravna vprašanja na podlagi študija sodne prakse Sodišča EU in slovenskih sodišč, preučevati moramo pravne predpise EU in domače pravne predpise ter spremljamo "potrebe" strank - podjetij, ki delujejo v Republiki Sloveniji ter na t.i. mednarodnih trgih. 


Mreža modro poslovanje, na dnevnem nivoju, spremlja spremembe iz spodaj navedenih baz podatkov.

   The partners (TAXIN d.o.o.) of the Wisdom Business Network study tax, legal and other business-legal issues based on the study of the case law of the Court of Justice of the EU and Slovenian courts, they must study EU legal regulations and domestic legal regulations, and they must monitor the needs of customers - companies that operate in the Republic of Slovenia and operate also on the so-called international markets.

The Wisdom business network monitors changes from the databases listed below on a daily basis.


 

UPRS Sodba I U 1021/2021-11

V obravnavanem primeru je tožeča stranka od svojega družbenika kupila lastni delež. Šlo je torej za eno prodajo, pravne in ekonomske posledice, predvidene za nakup lastnih deležev, pa so tudi dejansko in obenem nesporno nastale, saj je tožeča stranka pridobila lastne poslovne deleže, družbenik pa pravico do izplačila kupnine. V obravnavanem primeru ne more biti govora o umetnem konstruktu. Navedeno torej velja ne glede na očitke davčnega organa o namenu, ki da je bil v izognitvi plačilu 25 % davka na izplačilo dobička ter o ohranitvi pravic v tožeči stranki s strani družbenika, o povezanosti oseb, udeleženih pri transakciji ter o nižji obdavčitvi kupnine za lastni delež kot izplačanega dobička. Ker zakon v trenutku nastopa davčne obveznosti ni določal dodatnih pogojev za (ne) priznanje obdavčitve odkupa lastnih poslovnih deležev in prejete kupnine na podlagi ZDoh-2 oziroma za obdavčitev le-te kot dividend, pa tudi ni upoštevna presoja ekonomske in poslovne...
November 9, 2022 0 Comments

UPRS Sodba I U 1575/2019-14

Tožnik je odbitek DDV uveljavljal na podlagi sklepa o domiku, čeprav le-ta ne vsebuje podatkov, potrebnih za uveljavljanje odbitka. Tožnik je na sklepu namreč sam napisal, da je bila kupnina plačana ter da je sklep postal pravnomočen ter da uveljavlja odbitek. V primeru, če je kot plačnik DDV določen dolžnik, sodišče v njegovem imenu plačati DDV ter pred plačilom obvestiti pristojni finančni urad, pri čemer se kot obvestilo lahko šteje tudi sklep o izročitvi nepremičnine, če vsebuje vse podatke (višina plačila, kdaj bo plačilo izvedeno, za račun katerega zavezanca); kupec nepremičnine pa lahko uveljavlja pravico do odbitka na podlagi sklepa o izročitvi, na katerem je sodišče obračunalo DDV, če le-ta vsebuje vse predpisane podatke. Šele po izdaji sklepa o poplačilu bo dejansko razvidno, kaj se iz kupnine plačuje in šele tedaj bo zavezanec prejel listino oz. račun, iz katerega bodo razvidni podatki o DDV ali DPN.
November 9, 2022 0 Comments

UPRS Sodba I U 1729/2019-12

Davčni organ je v postopku ugotovil, da je tožnica pridobila kot darilo premično premoženje - denarna sredstva, ki se obdavčijo po določilih ZDoh-2, zato se postopek odmere davka od prejetega darila ustavi, napovedani prejemek pa se obdavči kot drugi dohodek po 105. členu ZDoh-2. Po določbi 2. točke tretjega odstavka 105. člena ZDoh-2 se med druge dohodke vključujejo tudi darila. Iz predhodno navedenega izhaja, da se prvostopenjski davčni organ strinja z opredelitvijo obravnavanega prejemka tožnice kot darila, ki ga je izplačala iz svojih sredstev citirana fundacija kot tuja pravna oseba zasebnega prava. Če pa gre v obravnavani zadevi za darilo, kot ga opredeljuje Obligacijski zakonik, pa za obdavčenje daril v takem primeru prvenstveno veljajo določbe ZDDD.
November 9, 2022 0 Comments

CELEX:32022D2187: Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2022/2187 of 8 November 2022 implementing Decision (CFSP) 2017/1775 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Mali

November 9, 2022 0 Comments

CELEX:32022D2185: Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/2185 of 8 November 2022 amending Decision (CFSP) 2018/1939 on Union support for the universalisation and effective implementation of the International Convention for the Suppression of Acts of Nuclear terrorism

November 9, 2022 0 Comments

CELEX:32022D2184: Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/2184 of 8 November 2022 amending Decision (CFSP) 2019/1296 in support of strengthening biological safety and security in Ukraine in line with the implementation of United Nations Security Council Resolution 1540 (2004) on non-proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and their means of delivery

November 9, 2022 0 Comments

CELEX:32022D2186: Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/2186 of 8 November 2022 amending Decision (CFSP) 2019/1894 concerning restrictive measures in view of Turkey’s unauthorised drilling activities in the Eastern Mediterranean

November 9, 2022 0 Comments

CELEX:32022D2188: Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2022/2188 of 8 November 2022 implementing Decision (CFSP) 2016/849 concerning restrictive measures against the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea

November 9, 2022 0 Comments

CELEX:32022R2180: Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/2180 of 8 November 2022 implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1509 concerning restrictive measures against the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea

November 9, 2022 0 Comments

CELEX:32022R2179: Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/2179 of 8 November 2022 implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1770 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Mali

November 9, 2022 0 Comments

CELEX:62020TJ0641_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 29 June 2022.#Leonine Distribution GmbH v European Commission.#Case T-641/20.

November 8, 2022 0 Comments

CELEX:62018CO0607_INF: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 1 July 2021.#NKT Verwaltungs GmbH and NKT A/S v European Commission.#Article 155 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Failure to adjudicate – None – Article 158 of the Rules of Procedure – Interpretation of a judgment – Inadmissibility.#Case C-607/18 P-OST.

November 8, 2022 0 Comments

CELEX:62018CO0755_INF: Order of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 19 March 2019.#Harry Shindler and Others v Council of the European Union.#Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Institutional law — Withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union — Article 50 TEU — Council Decision authorising the opening of negotiations with the United Kingdom with a view to concluding an agreement determining the terms of withdrawal – Loss of citizenship of the Union — Article 263, fourth para., TFEU — Whether directly concerned.#Case C-755/18 P.

November 8, 2022 0 Comments

CELEX:62016TJ0545: Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 15 June 2022.#YY and ZA v Court of Justice of the European Union.#Case T-545/16.

November 8, 2022 0 Comments

CELEX:62016TJ0532: Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 15 June 2022.#YT and YU v European Commission.#Case T-532/16.

November 8, 2022 0 Comments

CELEX:62017CO0233(02)_INF: Order of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 2 May 2019.#GX v European Commission.#Article 155 of the Rules of Procedure — No failure to adjudicate on the application for revision.#Case C-233/17 P-REV-.

November 8, 2022 0 Comments

CELEX:62019CJ0885: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 8 November 2022.#Fiat Chrysler Finance Europe and Ireland v European Commission.#Appeal – State aid – Aid implemented by the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg – Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market and unlawful and ordering its recovery – Tax ruling – Advantage – Selectivity – Arm’s length principle – Reference framework – National law applicable – ‘Normal’ taxation.#Joined Cases C-885/19 P and C-898/19 P.

November 8, 2022 0 Comments

CELEX:62019CJ0873: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 8 November 2022.#Deutsche Umwelthilfe eV v Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Environment – Aarhus Convention – Access to justice – Article 9(3) – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 47, first paragraph – Right to effective judicial protection – Environmental association – Standing of such an association to bring an action before a national court against EC type-approval granted to certain vehicles – Regulation (EC) No 715/2007 – Article 5(2)(a) – Motor vehicles – Diesel engine – Pollutant emissions – Valve for exhaust gas recirculation (EGR valve) – Reduction of nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions limited by a ‘temperature window’ – Defeat device – Authorisation of such a device

November 8, 2022 0 Comments

CELEX:62020CJ0704: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 8 November 2022.#Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid and X v C and Others.#References for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Detention of third-country nationals – Fundamental right to liberty – Article 6 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Conditions governing the lawfulness of detention – Directive 2008/115/EC – Article 15 – Directive 2013/33/EU – Article 9 – Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 – Article 28 – Review of the lawfulness of detention and of the continuation of a detention measure – Ex officio review – Fundamental right to an effective judicial remedy – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights.#Joined Cases C-704/20 and C-39/21.

November 8, 2022 0 Comments

Protidampinška in izravnalna dajatev

November 8, 2022 0 Comments
RSS
First11451146114711481150115211531154Last