Išči

Sodna praksa Sodišča EU, lastni članki, spremembe davčne zakonodaje....

Izbrani prispeveki - novice o davkih pri nas in v EU - NEWS about TAXES

V družbi TAXIN d.o.o. (mag. Franc Derganc), partnerici Mreže Modro Poslovanje preučujemo davčno-pravna in druga poslovno-pravna vprašanja na podlagi študija sodne prakse Sodišča EU in slovenskih sodišč, preučevati moramo pravne predpise EU in domače pravne predpise ter spremljamo "potrebe" strank - podjetij, ki delujejo v Republiki Sloveniji ter na t.i. mednarodnih trgih. 


Mreža modro poslovanje, na dnevnem nivoju, spremlja spremembe iz spodaj navedenih baz podatkov.

    The partners (TAXIN d.o.o.) of the Wisdom Business Network study tax, legal and other business-legal issues based on the study of the case law of the Court of Justice of the EU and Slovenian courts, they must study EU legal regulations and domestic legal regulations, and they must monitor the needs of customers - companies that operate in the Republic of Slovenia and operate also on the so-called international markets.

The Wisdom business network monitors changes from the databases listed below on a daily basis.


 

CELEX:62023TB0377: Case T-377/23: Order of the General Court of 9 July 2025 – Papouis Dairies and Others v Commission

September 15, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62025TN0517: Case T-517/25: Action brought on 28 July 2025 – Mims v Commission

September 15, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62025TN0490: Case T-490/25: Action brought on 8 July 2025 – Roja Parfums v EUIPO – Laurice El Badry Rahme (Bond No. 9 Manhattan)

September 15, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62024TB0510: Case T-510/24: Order of the General Court of 15 July 2025 – Gemballa v EUIPO – Gemballa (GEMBALLIN) (Action for annulment – EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark GEMBALLIN – Earlier EU and national figurative mark and word marks GEMBALLA – Relative ground for invalidity – No injury to reputation – Article 8(5) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

September 15, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:32025D1895: Council Decision (CFSP) 2025/1895 of 12 September 2025 amending Decision 2014/145/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine

September 15, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:32025R1894: Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1894 of 12 September 2025 implementing Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine

September 15, 2025 0 Comments

VSRS Sklep X DoR 34/2025-3

Revizija se dopusti glede vprašanja: "Ali je pravilno stališče Upravnega sodišča, da izdaja zapisnika, ki vsebuje vsa pravno pomembna dejstva ter pravno podlago, na kateri nato temelji izdana odločba, in je imel zavezanec možnost na zapisnik podati pripombe ter po njegovi izdaji ni bil prekludiran pri navajanju novih dejstev in predlaganju novih dokazov, ne zagotavlja pravice do izjave, če ni bil zavezanec pred tem izrecno seznanjen z relevantno pravno podlago?"
September 12, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62025TO0086(01): Order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 4 September 2025.#Maurice Taylor v Council of the European Union.#Action for annulment – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Reference to the applicant’s name in the identifying information of another person whose name is included on the list – No act adversely affecting a person – Inadmissibility.#Case T-86/25.

September 12, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62024CO0827:           Ordonnance de la Cour (neuvième chambre) du 2 septembre 2025.#Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Cluj-Napoca et Autoritatea Vamală Română prin Direcţia Regională Vamală Cluj contre Direct Line Inox Impex SRL e.a.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 99 du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Réponse pouvant être clairement déduite de la jurisprudence – Politique commerciale commune – Droits antidumping – Importation de tuyaux sans soudure, en acier inoxydable, originaires de Chine, étirés à froid en Inde – Règlement (UE) 2016/1036 – Article 13, paragraphe 1 – Contournement – Exclusion – Modification essentielle – Union douanière – Règlement (UE) no 952/2013 – Code des douanes de l’Union – Article 60, paragraphe 2 – Acquisition de l’origine des marchandise

This document does not exist in English.
September 12, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62024CO0625:           Ordonnance de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 4 septembre 2025.#« ClaimCompass » EOOD.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 53, paragraphe 2, et article 94, sous c), du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Exigence d’indication des raisons justifiant la nécessité d’une réponse par la Cour – Absence de précisions suffisantes – Irrecevabilité manifeste.#Affaire C-625/24.

This document does not exist in English.
September 12, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62025CO0019:           Ordonnance de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 4 septembre 2025.#« ClaimCompass » EOOD.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 53, paragraphe 2, et article 94, sous c), du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Exigence d’indication des raisons justifiant la nécessité d’une réponse par la Cour ainsi que du lien entre les dispositions du droit de l’Union dont l’interprétation est demandée et la législation nationale applicable – Absence de précisions suffisantes – Irrecevabilité manifeste.#Affaire C-19/25.

This document does not exist in English.
September 12, 2025 0 Comments

Finančna uprava na dogodku AmCham Komisije za spodbujanje investicij

September 12, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:32025B1565: Definitive adoption (EU, Euratom) 2025/1565 of Amending budget No 1 of the European Union for the financial year 2025

September 12, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:32024R1263R(03)

The corrigendum does not concern the English version.
September 12, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62023TJ0573: Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 10 September 2025.#Positive Group PAO v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists – Definition of ‘entities operating in the Russian IT sector with a license administered by the FSB’ – Article 2(1)(i) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 3(1)(i) of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Plea of illegality – Error of assessment – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the d

September 11, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62025CC0195: Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 11 September 2025.###

September 11, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62024CC0311: Opinion of Advocate General Rantos delivered on 11 September 2025.###

September 11, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62024CJ0038:           Arrêt de la Cour (première chambre) du 11 septembre 2025.#G.L. contre AB SpA.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Politique sociale – Convention des Nations unies relative aux droits des personnes handicapées – Articles 2, 5 et 7 – Articles 21, 24 et 26 de la charte des droits fondamentaux de l’Union européenne – Directive 2000/78/CE – Égalité de traitement en matière d’emploi et de travail – Article 1er – Article 2, paragraphe 1, et paragraphe 2, sous b) – Interdiction de discrimination fondée sur le handicap – Discrimination indirecte – Différence de traitement à l’égard d’un employé qui n’est pas lui-même handicapé mais qui s’occupe de son enfant handicapé – Article 5 – Obligation de l’employeur d’adopter des aménagements raisonnables.#Affaire C-38/24.

This document does not exist in English.
September 11, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62024CJ0215_RES:           Arrêt de la Cour (quatrième chambre) du 11 septembre 2025.#Ministério Público contre YX.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Espace de liberté, de sécurité et de justice – Coopération judiciaire en matière pénale – Décision-cadre 2002/584/JAI – Mandat d’arrêt européen émis aux fins d’exécution d’une peine privative de liberté – Article 4, point 6 – Motif de non-exécution facultative du mandat d’arrêt européen – Objectif de réinsertion sociale – Résidence de la personne condamnée – Prise en charge de l’exécution de la peine par l’État d’exécution conformément à son droit interne – Décision-cadre 2008/909/JAI – Reconnaissance mutuelle des jugements en matière pénale aux fins de leur exécution dans un autre État membre – Suspension de l’exécution d’une peine privative de li

This document does not exist in English.
September 11, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62024CC0471: Opinion of Advocate General Medina delivered on 11 September 2025.###

September 11, 2025 0 Comments
RSS
124678910Last