Išči

BAZA ZNANJA

Praksa Sodišča EU (DAVKI)

CELEX:62024CJ0497_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 11 December 2025.#GC, en son nom propre et en tant que propriétaire de l’exploitation agricole du même nom v Regione Marche.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Agriculture – Common agricultural policy – Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 – Support programme in the wine sector – Financing – Article 50 – European Union contribution – Calculation of the maximum aid rate – Inclusion of a tax credit provided for by national legislation.#Case C-497/24.

Anonym 0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0340_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 20 November 2025.#EW and LO v Ministero dell’Istruzione e del Merito and Ministero dell'Università e della Ricerca.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Free movement of persons – Articles 45 and 49 TFEU – Recognition of professional qualifications – Right to pursue the profession of a support teacher in a Member State – Nationals of that Member State who have obtained evidence of formal qualifications issued by a private higher education institute in another Member State – Formal qualification which is not legally recognised and does not give access to the corresponding profession in the latter Member State – Obligation on the first M

Anonym 0 0

CELEX:62024TJ0573_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 29 April 2026.#Romagnoli Fratelli SpA v Community Plant Variety Office.#Plant varieties – Grant of a Community plant variety right for the potato variety Melrose – Failure to pay the annual fee on time – Cancellation of right – Application for restitutio in integrum – Competence of the Board of Appeal – Concept of ‘particular circumstances’ – Conditions for notification of decisions and communications of the CPVO.#Case T-573/24.

Anonym 0 0

CELEX:62024TA0405: Case T-405/24: Judgment of the General Court of 18 March 2026 – Al Dibs v Council (Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Syria – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources and subject to restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists – Criterion of leading businessperson operating in Syria – Presumption of a link with the regime of Bashar al-Assad – Fall of the regime of Bashar Al-Assad – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Right to a fair trial – Right to effective judicial protection – Error of assess

Anonym 0 0

CELEX:62022CA0386: Case C-386/22 P: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 February 2026 – Martinair Holland v Commission (Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for airfreight – Decision of the European Commission finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport – Coordination of elements of the price of air freight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge and refusal to pay commission on surcharges) – Inbound freight services – Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission – Qualified effects)

Anonym 0 0

CELEX:62022CA0378: Case C-378/22 P: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 February 2026 – British Airways v Commission (Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for airfreight – Decision of the European Commission finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and Switzerland on Air Transport – Coordination of elements of the price of air freight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge and refusal to pay commission on surcharges) – Inbound freight services – Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission – Qualified effects – Characterisation – Single and continuous infringement – Taking into account the effects of the single and

Anonym 0 0

CELEX:62022CA0385: Case C-385/22 P: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 February 2026 – Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij v Commission (Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for airfreight – Decision of the European Commission finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport – Coordination of elements of the price of air freight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge and refusal to pay commission on surcharges) – Inbound freight services – Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission – Qualified effects)

Anonym 0 0

CELEX:62022CA0370: Case C-370/22 P: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 February 2026 – Air France-KLM v Commission (Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for airfreight – Decision of the European Commission finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport – Coordination of elements of the price of airfreight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge, and refusal to pay commission on surcharges) – Parent company and subsidiaries – Attributability of unlawful conduct – Inbound freight services – Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission – Qualified effects – Calculation of the fine

Anonym 0 0

CELEX:62022CA0380: Case C-380/22 P: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 February 2026 – Deutsche Lufthansa and Others v Commission (Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for airfreight – Decision of the European Commission finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and Switzerland on Air Transport – Coordination of elements of the price of air freight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge and refusal to pay commission on surcharges) – Inbound freight services – Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission – Qualified effects – Single and continuous infringement)

Anonym 0 0

CELEX:62022CA0379: Case C-379/22 P: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 February 2026 – Singapore Airlines and Singapore Airlines Cargo v Commission (Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for airfreight – Decision of the European Commission finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport – Coordination of elements of the price of air freight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge and refusal to pay commission on surcharges) – Inbound freight services – Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission – Qualified effects – Single and continuous infringement – Conduct adopted in the co

Anonym 0 0

CELEX:62022TA0575: Case T-575/22: Judgment of the General Court of 18 March 2026 – Robin Wood and Others v Commission (Environment – Aarhus Convention – Rejection of request for internal review – Article 10(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 – Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/2139 – Forest management – Activities relating to the production of fuels and bioenergy from forest biomass – Taxonomy – Requirements for technical screening criteria – Article 19 of Regulation (EU) 2020/852 – Substantial contribution to climate change mitigation and adaptation – Significant harm to environmental objectives)

Anonym 0 0

CELEX:62025TB0005: Case T-5/25: Order of the General Court of 9 March 2026 – HD and Others v Parliament and EEAS (Non-contractual liability – Official assigned to the European Union delegation in a third country – Domestic violence – Diplomatic immunity – Legal basis for the action – Article 270 TFEU – Failure to observe the pre-litigation procedure – Articles 90 and 91 of the Staff Regulations – Manifest inadmissibility)

Anonym 0 0
RSS
1345678910Last
Za funkcionalnost strani
uporabljamo piškotke,
ki ne hranijo osebnih podatkov.

Nekateri piškotki so bili
morda že servirani
v skladu z zakonodajo.

Z nadaljevanjem obiska strani soglašaš z njihovo uporabo.
Želim več informacij