Išči

BAZA ZNANJA

Praksa Sodišča EU (DAVKI)

CELEX:62024TO0446_INF: Order of the President of the General Court of 25 November 2024.#EV and Others v Council of the European Union.#Interim relief – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine – Prohibition on providing access to ports and to locks in the territory of the European Union to any vessel registered under the flag of Russia, including replicas of historical ships – Application for interim measures – Failure to comply with procedural requirements – Inadmissibility.#Case T-446/24 R.

Anonym 0 0
Read more

CELEX:62017TO0502(01)_INF:           Ordonnance du Tribunal (huitième chambre) du 22 janvier 2025.#Merlos Infor, SL contre Conseil de résolution unique.#Recours en annulation – Politique économique et monétaire – Mécanisme de résolution unique des établissements de crédit et de certaines entreprises d’investissement – Dispositif de résolution à l’égard de Banco Popular Español – Acte non susceptible de recours – Irrecevabilité manifeste.#Affaire T-502/17.

Anonym 0 0
This document does not exist in English.
Read more

CELEX:62017TO0511_INF:           Ordonnance du Tribunal (huitième chambre) du 22 janvier 2025.#José María Francisco Corra González e.a. contre Conseil de résolution unique.#Recours en annulation – Politique économique et monétaire – Mécanisme de résolution unique des établissements de crédit et de certaines entreprises d’investissement – Dispositif de résolution à l’égard de Banco Popular Español – Acte non susceptible de recours – Irrecevabilité manifeste.#Affaire T-511/17.

Anonym 0 0
This document does not exist in English.
Read more

CELEX:62017TO0527_INF:           Ordonnance du Tribunal (huitième chambre) du 22 janvier 2025.#Alejandro Claudio Waisman e.a. contre Conseil de résolution unique.#Recours en annulation et en indemnité – Politique économique et monétaire – Mécanisme de résolution unique des établissements de crédit et de certaines entreprises d’investissement – Dispositif de résolution à l’égard de Banco Popular Español – Acte non susceptible de recours – Irrecevabilité manifeste.#Affaire T-527/17.

Anonym 0 0
This document does not exist in English.
Read more

CELEX:62017TO0693_INF:           Ordonnance du Tribunal (huitième chambre) du 22 janvier 2025.#Abel García Gómez e.a. contre Conseil de résolution unique.#Recours en annulation et en indemnité – Politique économique et monétaire – Mécanisme de résolution unique des établissements de crédit et de certaines entreprises d’investissement – Dispositif de résolution à l’égard de Banco Popular Español – Acte non susceptible de recours – Irrecevabilité manifeste.#Affaire T-693/17.

Anonym 0 0
This document does not exist in English.
Read more

CELEX:62022TJ0271_INF: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 22 January 2025.#Andrey Melnichenko v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Concept of ‘leading businessperson involved in economic sectors providing a substantial source of revenue to the Government of the Russian Federation’ – Article 2(1)(g) of Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 3(1)(g) of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Error of assessment – Proportionality – Ri

Anonym 0 0
Read more

CELEX:62024CO0577_INF: Order of the Court of 8 January 2025.#Peikko Group Oy v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request not demonstrating that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-577/24 P.

Anonym 0 0
Read more

CELEX:62023TJ0517_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 22 January 2025.#Tes Electrical Electronic Corp. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – European Union figurative mark TES – Partial revocation – Genuine use of the mark – Proof of genuine use – Article 58(1)(a) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Evidence adduced for the first time before the General Court.#Case T-517/23.

Anonym 0 0
Read more

CELEX:62023TJ0176: Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 2 July 2025.#PT Musim Mas v European Commission.#Commercial policy – Dumping – Imports of fatty acid originating in Indonesia – Definitive anti-dumping duty – Article 9(1) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 – Continuation of the investigation after withdrawal of the complaint – Article 2(3) and (6) of Regulation 2016/1036 – Constructed normal value – Article 9(4) of Regulation 2016/1036 – Article 21(1) of Regulation 2016/1036 – Union interest analysis – Manifest error of assessment – Error of law.#Case T-176/23.

Anonym 0 0
Read more

CELEX:62023CJ0582_RES: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 3 July 2025.#R.S. v C. S.A. and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Article 6(1) and Article 7(1) – Powers and obligations of the national court – Insolvency proceedings relating to a natural person – Bankruptcy court has no power to examine ex officio whether the terms of a contract that gave rise to a claim on the list of claims are unfair – No power for that court to order interim measures – Principle of effectiveness.#Case C-582/23.

Anonym 0 0
Read more

CELEX:62023TJ1134_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 20 November 2024.#Enrique Pich-Aguilera Molins v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark Carmen says – Earlier national figurative mark del Carmen – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Reimbursement of representation costs – Article 109 of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-1134/23.

Anonym 0 0
Read more

CELEX:62024CJ0114_RES: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 3 July 2025.#Global Nanotechnologies AE schediasmou anaptyxis paraskevis kai emporias ylikon nanotechnologias (Glonatech) v European Research Executive Agency.#Appeal – Arbitration clause – Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013) – The SANAD project – Staff costs – Eligible costs – Request for recovery – Debit note – Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Principle of good administration – Substitution of grounds – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Right to effective judicial protection – Burden of proof – Proportionality.#Case C-114/24 P.

Anonym 0 0
Read more

CELEX:62023CJ0646_RES: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 3 July 2025.#Criminal proceedings against P.B. and R.S.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Rule of law – Independence of the judiciary – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Effective judicial protection in areas covered by EU law – Principle of irremovability of judges – Military judge found unfit for professional military service – National legislation requiring the early retirement of that judge.#Joined Cases C-646/23 and C-661/23.

Anonym 0 0
Read more

CELEX:62023CJ0610_RES: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 3 July 2025.#FO v Ypourgos Metanastefsis kai Asylou.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Asylum policy – International protection – Common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection – Directive 2013/32/EU – Article 46 – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 47 – Right to an effective remedy – Requirement of full and ex nunc examination of the appeal – Obligation to appear in person before the authority examining the appeal – Presumption that an appeal has been improperly brought – Dismissal of the appeal as manifestly unfounded without examination of the merits – Principle of proportionality.#Case C-610/23.

Anonym 0 0
Read more
RSS
1345678910Last
Za funkcionalnost strani
uporabljamo piškotke,
ki ne hranijo osebnih podatkov.

Nekateri piškotki so bili
morda že servirani
v skladu z zakonodajo.

Z nadaljevanjem obiska strani soglašaš z njihovo uporabo.
 Želim več informacij