Išči

BAZA ZNANJA

Praksa Sodišča EU (DAVKI)

CELEX:62024CJ0544_SUM: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 30 April 2026.#,,Nekilnojamojo turto valdymas“ BUAB v Valstybinė mokesčių inspekcija prie Lietuvos Respublikos finansų ministerijos.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 273 – Article 49(3) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Obligations deemed necessary to ensure the correct collection of VAT and to prevent fraud – National legislation providing for a set of rules in respect of default interest relating to VAT arrears – Charging of default interest – Principle of proportionality.#Case C-544/24.

Anonym 0 0

CELEX:62025TO0214_INF: Order of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 10 February 2026.#IR v Council of the European Union.#Civil service – Officials – Disciplinary proceedings – Disciplinary penalty – Downgrading in the same function group – Unauthorised engagement in outside activities – Article 10 of Annex IX to the Staff Regulations – Manifest error of assessment – Proportionality – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-214/25.

Anonym 0 0

CELEX:62023TJ0328_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 4 February 2026.#Radical-Consulting UG and Others v European High-Performance Computing Joint Undertaking.#Research and technological development – Horizon Europe Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2021-2027) – High-performance computing applications – Call for proposals with a view to the award of a grant – Decision rejecting a proposal – Decision rejecting the request for an evaluation review – Action for annulment – Locus standi – Interest in bringing proceedings – Admissibility – Manifest error of assessment – Obligation to state reasons – Principle of transparency – Equal treatment – Article 30 of Regulation (EU) 2021/695.#Case T-328/23.

Anonym 0 0

CELEX:62021TJ0359_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 25 March 2026.#ClientEarth AISBL v European Commission.#Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Documents concerning the active substances mancozeb and cypermethrin – Individual positions of the Member States in the Standing Committee on Plants, Animals, Food and Feed – Partial refusal of access – Article 4(2) and (3) of Regulation No 1049/2001 – Exception relating to the protection of the decision-making process – Exception relating to the protection of court proceedings – Overriding public interest.#Case T-359/21.

Anonym 0 0

CELEX:62026CB0278: Case C-278/26 P: Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 30 June 2026 Appeal brought on 1 April 2026 by Puma SE against the judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 21 January 2026 – T-43/25, Puma v EUIPO – Ningbo Gongfang Commercial Management (Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed)

Anonym 0 0

CELEX:62025CB0255: Case C-255/25, Technikes Anaktisis kai Diachorismou: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 29 June 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Symvoulio tis Epikrateias – Greece) – Technikes Anaktisis kai Diachorismou AE (ECORESET AE) v Perifereia Attikis (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Reply which may be clearly deduced from existing case-law – Private investment aid scheme – Aid scheme compatible with the internal market – Refusal by the competent authority to grant aid under that scheme – Legal action seeking annulment of that refusal decision – Retroactive effect of a possible judicial annulment of that refusal decision – Expiry, during the legal proceedings, of the period laid down for granti

Anonym 0 0

CELEX:62024CA0754: Case C-754/24 P: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 18 June 2026 – Fachverband Eisenhüttenschlacken v Commission (Appeal – Regulation (EU) 2019/1009 – Article 42(7) and (8) – Making available on the market of EU fertilising products – Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/973 – Article 2(2) and (3) – Criteria on agronomic efficiency and safety for the use of by-products in EU fertilising products – Limit values for chromium and vanadium in EU fertilising products using ferrous slags as by-products – Precautionary principle – Principle of proportionality)

Anonym 0 0

CELEX:62024CA0376: Case C-376/24, FSMA: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 18 June 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d'appel de Bruxelles – Belgium) – MT v Comité de direction de l’Autorité des Services et des Marchés Financiers (FSMA) (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2003/6/EC – Article 3 – Regulation (EU) No 596/2014 – Article 10 – Unlawful disclosure of inside information – Insider dealing and market abuse – Financial services – Article 21 – Disclosure or dissemination of information in the media – Disclosure of inside information in the media by a politician – Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, signed at Rome on 4 November 1950 – Article 10 – Article 11 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Freedom of expres

Anonym 0 0

CELEX:62024CA0414: Case C-414/24, Datenschutzbehörde (Relationship between remedies): Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 18 June 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof – Austria) – Datenschutzbehörde, Dr. G S (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Articles 77 and 79 – Remedies – Parallel exercise – Relationship between the lodging of a complaint with a national supervisory authority and the exercise of a judicial remedy – Risk of contradictory decisions – Principle of effective judicial protection – Procedural autonomy of the Member States – Principle of effectiveness – Principle of equivalence)

Anonym 0 0

CELEX:62025CA0346: Case C-346/25, Fibo Markets: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 18 June 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší soud – Czech Republic) – FIBO Markets LTD v J.P. (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Conflicts of laws – Regulation (EC) No 593/2008 (Rome I) – Applicable law – Consumer contracts – Exceptions – Financial contracts for differences (CFDs) – Rights and obligations which constitute a financial instrument – Process of setting prices for CFDs – Difference between the exchange rate deviation accepted in the consumer’s order and the exchange rate deviation in the transaction executed)

Anonym 0 0

CELEX:62024CA0575: Case C-575/24, Vodovody a kanalizace Přerov: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 18 June 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Městský soud v Praze – Czech Republic) – Vodovody a kanalizace Přerov, a.s. v Úřad pro ochranu osobních údajů (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Open data and the re-use of public sector information – Directive (EU) 2019/1024 – Article 2(3) – Jurisdiction of the Court of Justice – Concept of public undertaking – Undertaking owned by several public sector bodies – Presumption of dominant influence – Criteria for assessment)

Anonym 0 0
RSS
1345678910Last
Za funkcionalnost strani
uporabljamo piškotke,
ki ne hranijo osebnih podatkov.

Nekateri piškotki so bili
morda že servirani
v skladu z zakonodajo.

Z nadaljevanjem obiska strani soglašaš z njihovo uporabo.
Želim več informacij