Vrsta AI: Disclaimer AI Kaj prejmete
AI Davčni Asistent: modro-poslovanje.si

Problemi z davčnim postopkom, vodenje poslovnih? knjig....pridobite nasvet ali ponudbo za vodenje poslovnih knjig ali pomoč pri preoblikovanju podjetja (normiranec, lmet, zavod, d.o.o.....), inšpekcije....
AI Davki/Računovodstvo

Problemi z razumevanjem davkov, prispevkov?....svetovalec potrdi odgovor na vprašanja o DAVKIH - AI modri davčni nasvet pa naredi (Povzetek → Razlaga → Koraki → Viri. in Potrditev odgovora s strani Derganc Franc)
 (Rezervirajte termin pri DAVČNEM SVETOVALCU - mag. Franc Derganc)

Išči

Sodna praksa Sodišča EU, lastni članki, spremembe davčne zakonodaje....

Izbrani prispeveki - novice o davkih pri nas in v EU - NEWS about TAXES

V družbi TAXIN d.o.o. (mag. Franc Derganc), partnerici Mreže Modro Poslovanje preučujemo davčno-pravna in druga poslovno-pravna vprašanja na podlagi študija sodne prakse Sodišča EU in slovenskih sodišč, preučevati moramo pravne predpise EU in domače pravne predpise ter spremljamo "potrebe" strank - podjetij, ki delujejo v Republiki Sloveniji ter na t.i. mednarodnih trgih. 


Mreža modro poslovanje, na dnevnem nivoju, spremlja spremembe iz spodaj navedenih baz podatkov.

    The partners (TAXIN d.o.o.) of the Wisdom Business Network study tax, legal and other business-legal issues based on the study of the case law of the Court of Justice of the EU and Slovenian courts, they must study EU legal regulations and domestic legal regulations, and they must monitor the needs of customers - companies that operate in the Republic of Slovenia and operate also on the so-called international markets.

The Wisdom business network monitors changes from the databases listed below on a daily basis.


 

CELEX:62025TJ0229: Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 14 January 2026.#Ionfarma, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark DESMOMED – Prior national word mark DERMOMED – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – No similarity between the goods at issue – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-229/25.

January 14, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62025TJ0117:           Arrêt du Tribunal (première chambre) du 14 janvier 2026.#Atlas Invest BV contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle.#Marque de l’Union européenne – Demande de marque de l’Union européenne figurative BioTechUSA – Motif absolu de refus – Caractère descriptif – Article 7, paragraphe 1, sous c), du règlement (UE) 2017/1001 – Obligation de motivation – Article 94, paragraphe 1, du règlement 2017/1001.#Affaire T-117/25.

This document does not exist in English.
January 14, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62024TJ0176: Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 14 January 2026.#Feras Al Akhras v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Syria – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources and subject to restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists – ‘Family membership’ criterion – Criterion of ‘association with members of the Assad or Makhlouf families’ – Plea of illegality – Obligation to state reasons – Communication of the restrictive measures – Error of assessment – Proportionality – F

January 14, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62024TJ0371_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 10 September 2025.#La Superquímica, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark Monta – Earlier national figurative mark MONTACK – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-371/24.

January 14, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62024TJ0238_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 24 September 2025.#Bogoljub Karić v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Belarus and the involvement of Belarus in the Russian aggression against Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on admission to the territory of the Member States – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources or to restrictions on admission to the territory of the Member States – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Obligation to state reasons – Error of assessment.#Case T-238/24.

January 14, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62024TJ0619: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 14 January 2026.#Kimpton Hotel & Restaurant Group LLC v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Applications for the EU word marks Kimkom and Kimsum – Earlier EU word mark KIMPTON – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Similarity of the services – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-619/24.

January 14, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62024TO0568_INF: Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 25 September 2025.#VTB Bank PAO v European Central Bank.#Case T-568/24.

January 14, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62023TJ1154_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 14 May 2025.#Taxolutions BV v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark TAXMARC – Earlier EU figurative mark X TAXMAN – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Relevant public – Conceptual similarity.#Case T-1154/23.

January 14, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62025TJ0064: Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 14 January 2026.#Lisa Leone and Others v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark Leone – Relative ground for invalidity – Right to an earlier name under Austrian law – Article 60(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-64/25.

January 14, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62025TJ0009:           Urteil des Gerichts (Achte Kammer) vom 14. Januar 2026.#Kct GmbH & Co. KG gegen Amt der Europäischen Union für geistiges Eigentum.#Unionsmarke – Anmeldung einer Unionsmarke, die aus der Bewegung eines Klappfensters besteht – Absolutes Eintragungshindernis – Zeichen, das ausschließlich aus einem charakteristischen Merkmal der Ware besteht, das zur Erreichung einer technischen Wirkung erforderlich ist – Art. 7 Abs. 1 Buchst. e Ziff. ii der Verordnung (EU) 2017/1001.#Rechtssache T-9/25.

This document does not exist in English.
January 14, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62024TJ0549:           Urteil des Gerichts (Erste Kammer) vom 14. Januar 2026.#Schönegger Käse-Alm GmbH gegen Amt der Europäischen Union für geistiges Eigentum.#Unionsmarke – Verfahren zur Erklärung des Verfalls – Unionswortmarke Rebell – Erklärung des teilweisen Verfalls – Entscheidung, die nach Aufhebung einer früheren Entscheidung durch das Gericht ergangen ist – Art. 72 Abs. 6 der Verordnung (EU) 2017/1001 – Unterbrechung des Verfahrens – Art. 106 Abs. 1 Buchst. b der Verordnung 2017/1001 – Wiederaufnahme des Verfahrens – Art. 72 Abs. 1 der Delegierten Verordnung (EU) 2018/625 – Antrag auf Erklärung des Verfalls – Art. 63 Abs. 1 der Verordnung 2017/1001 – Zustellung an Vertreter – Art. 60 Abs. 1 der Delegierten Verordnung 2018/625.#Rechtssache T-549/24.

This document does not exist in English.
January 14, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62024TJ0403:           Arrêt du Tribunal (cinquième chambre) du 14 janvier 2026.#Issam Anbouba contre Conseil de l'Union européenne.#Politique étrangère et de sécurité commune – Mesures restrictives prises en raison de la situation en Syrie – Gel des fonds – Restrictions en matière d’admission sur le territoire des États membres – Listes des personnes, des entités et des organismes auxquels s’applique le gel des fonds et des ressources économiques et faisant l’objet de restrictions en matière d’admission sur le territoire des États membres – Maintien du nom du requérant sur les listes – Critère de la “femme ou de l’homme d’affaires influent exerçant ses activités en Syrie” – Présomption de lien avec le régime syrien – Chute du régime de Bachar al-Assad – Erreur d’appréciation – Obli

This document does not exist in English.
January 14, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62024CJ0452_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 August 2025.#Lunapark Scandinavia Oy Ltd v Hardeco Finland Oy.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein oikeus.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Trade marks – Directive (EU) 2015/2436 – Article 10 – Exclusive rights of the proprietor of a registered trade mark to oppose the use, by a third party, of a sign which is identical with, or similar to, that mark – Infringement action – Limitations of the exclusive rights of the proprietor of that trade mark – Article 9 and Article 18(1) – Preclusion due to acquiescence – Exhaustive nature of the conditions under which that preclusion can arise – Inapplicability of a general principle of national law that provides for preclusion of the right to prohibit the use of a si

January 13, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62025CO0137_INF: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 10 November 2025.#J.F. and P.F. v Bank BPH S.A.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie.#Case C-137/25.

January 13, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62024CJ0365_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 10 July 2025.#Purefun Group AB v Doggy AB.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Svea hovrätt, Patent- och marknadsöverdomstolen.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Trade marks – Directive (EU) 2015/2436 – Free movement of goods – Articles 34 and 36 TFEU – Trade name – Company name – National legislation conferring an exclusive right on the proprietor of a company name.#Case C-365/24.

January 13, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62024CJ0512_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 1 August 2025.#BÁV Zrt. v Budapest Főváros Kormányhivatala.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH Regulation) – Registration, evaluation and authorisation of chemicals – Annex XVII – Restrictions on the manufacture, placing on the market and use of certain dangerous substances, mixtures and articles – Restrictions concerning cadmium – Maximum concentration in metal parts of jewellery and imitation jewellery articles and hair accessories – Derogation – Silver bracelet dating from the 1940s, the brazing of which contains cadmium.#Case C-512/24.

January 13, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62023CJ0702_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 1 August 2025.#Gennady Nikolayevich Timchenko v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine – Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 2(1)(a) and (d) – Inclusion of the appellant’s name due to his support for the actions or policies of the Russian Federation against Ukraine and to the material or financial support provided to Russian decision-makers – Effect of the appellant’s failure to distance himself and of his passive attitude.#Case C-702/23 P.

January 13, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62025CO0432_INF: Order of the Court of 2 December 2025.#Dr. August Wolff GmbH & Co. KG Arzneimittel v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-432/25 P.

January 13, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62023CJ0703_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 1 August 2025.#Elena Petrovna Timchenko v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine – Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 1(1) in fine – Restrictive measures imposed on a natural person associated with another natural person who is in turn subject to restrictive measures – Concept of ‘association in the case of two people who have a family relationship’.#Case C-703/23 P.

January 13, 2026 0 Comments

CELEX:62023CJ0636_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 1 August 2025.#W and X v Belgische Staat and État belge, représenté par la Secrétaire d’État à l’Asile et la Migration.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Raad voor Vreemdelingenbetwistingen and Conseil du Contentieux des Étrangers.#References for a preliminary ruling – Border controls, asylum and immigration – Immigration policy – Directive 2008/115/EC – Common standards and procedures in Member States for returning illegally staying third-country nationals – Article 3(4) and (6), Article 7(1) and (4), Article 8(1) and (2), Article 11(1) and Article 13 – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Return decision – Decision not to grant a period for voluntary departure – Entry ban – Actiona

January 13, 2026 0 Comments
RSS
1345678910Last