Išči

Sodna praksa Sodišča EU, lastni članki, spremembe davčne zakonodaje....

Izbrani prispeveki - novice o davkih pri nas in v EU - NEWS about TAXES

V družbi TAXIN d.o.o. (mag. Franc Derganc), partnerici Mreže Modro Poslovanje preučujemo davčno-pravna in druga poslovno-pravna vprašanja na podlagi študija sodne prakse Sodišča EU in slovenskih sodišč, preučevati moramo pravne predpise EU in domače pravne predpise ter spremljamo "potrebe" strank - podjetij, ki delujejo v Republiki Sloveniji ter na t.i. mednarodnih trgih. 


Mreža modro poslovanje, na dnevnem nivoju, spremlja spremembe iz spodaj navedenih baz podatkov.

    The partners (TAXIN d.o.o.) of the Wisdom Business Network study tax, legal and other business-legal issues based on the study of the case law of the Court of Justice of the EU and Slovenian courts, they must study EU legal regulations and domestic legal regulations, and they must monitor the needs of customers - companies that operate in the Republic of Slovenia and operate also on the so-called international markets.

The Wisdom business network monitors changes from the databases listed below on a daily basis.


 

CELEX:62024TJ0040_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 26 February 2025.#Instituto dos Vinhos do Douro e do Porto, IP (IVDP) v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark PORTSOY – Earlier PDO ‘Port’ – Article 8(6) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Article 103(2)(a)(i) and (ii) and (b) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 – Concepts of ‘use’ and ‘evocation’ of a PDO.#Case T-40/24.

October 9, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62024TJ0023_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 26 February 2025.#Instituto dos Vinhos do Douro e do Porto, IP (IVDP) v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark Quevedo Port – Earlier PDO ‘Porto/Port’ – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(6) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Article 103(2)(a)(ii) and (b) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 – Concepts of ‘use’ and ‘evocation’ of a PDO.#Case T-23/24.

October 9, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62023TJ1135_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 5 March 2025.#Funline International Corp. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark JUNGLE PREMIUM – Lack of genuine use of the mark – Article 58(1)(a) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Action for annulment – Representation by a lawyer – Admissibility.#Case T-1135/23.

October 9, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62025TO0067_INF: Order of the President of the General Court of 3 March 2025.#Călin Georgescu v Romania and European Commission.#Interim relief – Dismissal of the main action – No need to adjudicate.#Case T-67/25 R.

October 9, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62024TJ0298_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 30 April 2025.#DoDo Services s.r.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark doqo – Earlier EU figurative mark Do Do – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-298/24.

October 9, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62024TJ0095_INF: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 30 April 2025.#Laura Food Srl v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark THE VERT DE CHINE 4011 ALJAMAL ALJAMAL 4011 B 552 – Earlier EU figurative marks 4011 B 552 and 4011 B 552 TE VERDE DI CINA – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-95/24.

October 9, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62024TJ0241_INF: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 30 April 2025.#AirPlus International GmbH, anciennement Lufthansa AirPlus Servicekarten GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark R+ – Earlier EU word marks AirPlus International, AirPlus Connect and AirPlus CardControl and figurative mark AirPlus INTERNATIONAL – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Examination of the facts of EUIPO’s own motion – Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Well-known facts – Refusal of the request for oral proceedings before the Board of Appeal – Article 96(1) of Regu

October 9, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62024TO0502_INF: Order of the President of the General Court of 19 February 2025.#UF v European Commission.#Case T-502/24 R.

October 9, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62024TJ0251_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 30 April 2025.#Serana Europe GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case T-251/24.

October 9, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62024TJ0312_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 30 April 2025.#Real Pharm Group sp. z o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark REAL PHARM – Earlier EU figurative mark real,- – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Similarity of the signs – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-312/24.

October 9, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62024TJ0272_INF: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 2 April 2025.#Dmitry Alexandrovich Pumpyanskiy v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Article 2(1)(f) and (g) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 3(1)(f) and (g) of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Error of assessment.#Case T-272/24.

October 9, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62023TJ1108_INF: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 2 April 2025.#Galina Evgenyevna Pumpyanskaya v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists – Article 2(1), in fine, of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Concept of ‘benefit received from a leading businessperson operating in Russia’ – Article 2(1)(g) of Decision 2014/145 – Article 3(1)(g) of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Error of assessment.#Case T-1108/23.

October 9, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62024CC0483:           Conclusions de l'avocat général Mme J. Kokott, présentées le 9 octobre 2025.###

This document does not exist in English.
October 9, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62024CJ0368:           Arrêt de la Cour (huitième chambre) du 9 octobre 2025.#Commission européenne contre République hellénique.#Manquement d’État – Arrêt de la Cour constatant un manquement – Inexécution – Article 260, paragraphe 2, TFUE – Environnement – Directives 2008/98/CE et 1999/31/CE – Déchets – Décharge sur l’île de Zakynthos (Grèce) – Obligation de désaffecter cette décharge n’ayant pas obtenu l’autorisation requise – Sanctions pécuniaires – Astreinte – Somme forfaitaire.#Affaire C-368/24.

This document does not exist in English.
October 9, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62023CJ0798: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 9 October 2025.#Minister for Justice v SH.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – Article 4a(1) – Surrender procedure between Member States – European arrest warrant – Conditions for execution – Grounds for optional non-execution – Mandatory execution – Exceptions – Concept of ‘trial resulting in the decision’ – Additional sentence of police supervision – Breach of the conditions imposed in connection with that supervision – Decision converting police supervision into a custodial sentence – Sentence handed down in absentia.#Case C-798/23.

October 9, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62025CO0013:           Ordonnance de la Cour (huitième chambre) du 1er octobre 2025.#OU contre Commission européenne.#Pourvoi – Article 181 du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Défaut de clarté et de précision des moyens – Pourvoi manifestement irrecevable.#Affaire C-13/25 P.

This document does not exist in English.
October 9, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62024CC0386: Opinion of Advocate General Emiliou delivered on 9 October 2025.###

October 9, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62024CJ0416:           Arrêt de la Cour (première chambre) du 9 octobre 2025.#On Air Media Professionals SRL contre Agenția pentru Întreprinderi Mici şi Mijlocii Iași.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Aides d’État – Règlement (UE) no 651/2014 – Exemption de certaines catégories d’aides compatibles avec le marché intérieur – Erreur de traduction dans la version en langue roumaine de ce règlement – Effets juridiques du règlement rectifiant cette erreur – Possibilité de récupération d’une aide octroyée avant la rectification dans le respect des conditions énoncées dans la version du règlement contenant l’erreur de traduction – Protection de la confiance légitime – Sécurité juridique.#Affaire C-416/24.

This document does not exist in English.
October 9, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62024CJ0080:           Arrêt de la Cour (quatrième chambre) du 9 octobre 2025.#Zwrotybankowe.pl sp. z o.o. contre Powszechna Kasa Oszczędności Bank Polski S.A.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Contrats de crédit aux consommateurs – Directive 2008/48/CE – Article 22, paragraphe 2 – Caractère impératif de cette directive – Cession au bénéfice d’un tiers par un consommateur de sa créance à l’égard d’une banque – Directive 93/13/CEE – Article 6, paragraphe 1 – Article 7, paragraphe 1 – Clauses abusives dans les contrats conclus avec les consommateurs – Examen d’office par le juge national du caractère abusif des clauses d’un contrat de cession de créance ne faisant pas l’objet du litige pendant devant ce juge.#Affaire C-80/24.

This document does not exist in English.
October 9, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62024CJ0540:           Urteil des Gerichtshofs (Erste Kammer) vom 9. Oktober 2025.#Cabris lnvestments Ltd gegen Revetas Capital Advisors LLP.#Vorlage zur Vorabentscheidung – Gerichtliche Zuständigkeit und Vollstreckung von Entscheidungen in Zivil- und Handelssachen – Verordnung (EU) Nr. 1215/2012 – Anwendungsbereich – Art. 25 – Gerichtsstandsvereinbarung – In demselben Drittstaat ansässige Vertragsparteien – Zuweisung der Zuständigkeit der Gerichte eines Mitgliedstaats für Rechtsstreitigkeiten aus diesem Vertrag – Auslandsbezug – Folgen des Austritts des Vereinigten Königreichs Großbritannien und Nordirland aus der Europäischen Union.#Rechtssache C-540/24.

This document does not exist in English.
October 9, 2025 0 Comments
RSS
First3132333436383940Last