Išči

Sodna praksa Sodišča EU, lastni članki, spremembe davčne zakonodaje....

Izbrani prispeveki - novice o davkih pri nas in v EU - NEWS about TAXES

V družbi TAXIN d.o.o. (mag. Franc Derganc), partnerici Mreže Modro Poslovanje preučujemo davčno-pravna in druga poslovno-pravna vprašanja na podlagi študija sodne prakse Sodišča EU in slovenskih sodišč, preučevati moramo pravne predpise EU in domače pravne predpise ter spremljamo "potrebe" strank - podjetij, ki delujejo v Republiki Sloveniji ter na t.i. mednarodnih trgih. 


Mreža modro poslovanje, na dnevnem nivoju, spremlja spremembe iz spodaj navedenih baz podatkov.

    The partners (TAXIN d.o.o.) of the Wisdom Business Network study tax, legal and other business-legal issues based on the study of the case law of the Court of Justice of the EU and Slovenian courts, they must study EU legal regulations and domestic legal regulations, and they must monitor the needs of customers - companies that operate in the Republic of Slovenia and operate also on the so-called international markets.

The Wisdom business network monitors changes from the databases listed below on a daily basis.


 

CELEX:62023TJ0399_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 29 October 2025 (Extracts).#ClientEarth and Collectif Nourrir v European Commission.#Case T-399/23.

November 7, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62023TJ0525_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 19 March 2025.#Portuguese Republic v European Commission.#Case T-525/23.

November 7, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62024TJ0038_INF: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 11 June 2025.#OMV AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – International registration designating the European Union – Mark consisting in a combination of the colours blue and green – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Legal certainty – Equal treatment – Sound administration – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-38/24.

November 7, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62024TJ0325_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 30 April 2025.#EL v European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – Recruitment – Internal competition COM/AD6/2022 – Decision not to admit the applicant to the next stage of the competition – Neutralisation of certain questions in the multiple-choice questionnaire test – Method of neutralisation – Lack of rounding.#Case T-325/24.

November 7, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62019TO0663_INF: Order of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 26 May 2025.#Hasbro, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Procedure – Taxation of costs – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case T-663/19 DEP.

November 7, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62025TO0110_INF:           Ordonnance du président du Tribunal du 23 mai 2025.#Hongrie contre Commission européenne et Agence exécutive européenne pour le climat, les infrastructures et l’environnement.#Référé – Mécanisme pour l’interconnexion en Europe (MIE) – Convention de subvention – Projet “Connexion des éléments du réseau central dans le secteur des transports : Corridor Rhin-Danube – Pont transfrontalier Komárom-Komárno” – Note de débit – Demande de sursis à exécution – Défaut d’urgence.#Affaire T-110/25 R.

This document does not exist in English.
November 7, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62024TJ0461_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 11 June 2025.#SHS - Stahl-Holding-Saar GmbH & Co. KGaA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case T-461/24.

November 7, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62024TJ0046_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 11 June 2025.#Coinbase, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – International registration designating the European Union in respect of the word mark coinbase – Absolute ground for invalidity – Bad faith – Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-46/24.

November 7, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62024TJ0352_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 11 June 2025.#CeramicSpeed Sport A/S v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark OSPW System – Absolute ground for invalidity – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94 of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-352/24.

November 7, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62025TO0386(01): Order of the President of the General Court of 5 November 2025.#DLF Beet Seed ApS and United Beet Seeds v European Chemicals Agency.#Interim relief – Access to documents – Regulation (EU) No 649/2012 – Export notifications for hazardous chemicals that are banned or severely restricted within the European Union – Documents concerning the applicants held by ECHA – Decision to grant a third party access to the documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Exception relating to the protection of the commercial interests of a third party – Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 – Concept of ‘information [which] relates to emissions into the environment’ – Application for interim measures – No prima facie case.#Case T-386/25 R.

November 7, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62025CO0590: Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 30 October 2025.#Alireza Malekzadeh Arasteh v European Commission.#Appeal – Interim relief – Actions for damages – Request for the initiation of infringement proceedings against the Kingdom of Sweden – Decision of the European Commission rejecting that request – Damage allegedly suffered by the appellant – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-590/25 P(R).

November 7, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62024TJ0431_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 25 June 2025.#Certinvest SRL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark Premium Quality REGAL Bakery – Earlier EU word mark REGAL and earlier EU figurative mark Regal – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-431/24.

November 7, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62022TJ0366_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 25 June 2025.#Ryanair DAC v European Commission.#State aid – German air transport market – Public loan guaranteed by Germany to Condor Flugdienst in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic – Decision not to raise any objections – Aid intended to make good the damage caused by an exceptional occurrence – Article 107(2)(b) TFEU – Assessment of the damage – Direct causal link – Assessment of the amount of the aid – Principle of non-discrimination – Freedom to provide services – Freedom of establishment – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-366/22.

November 7, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62024TJ0273_INF: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 25 June 2025.#Pavel Ezubov v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Restriction on admission to the territory of the Member States – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and restrictions on admission to the territory of the Member States – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists – Concept of ‘person benefitting from a leading businessperson’ – Article 2(1)(g) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Error of assessment.#Case T-273/24.

November 7, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62024TJ0505_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 11 June 2025.#KenWave Solutions Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark DYNAMIC RESPONSE IMAGING – Absolute ground for refusal – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-505/24.

November 7, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62025TO0363:           Ordonnance du Tribunal (chambre préjudicielle) du 30 octobre 2025.#UNIX Autó és Autóalkatrészkereskedelmi Kft. contre Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 226 du règlement de procédure du Tribunal – Réponse pouvant être clairement déduite de la jurisprudence – Fiscalité – Système commun de TVA – Directive 2006/112/CE – Article 168, sous a), et article 178, sous a) – Droit à déduction de la TVA payée en amont – Refus – Fraude fiscale – Opération ne se déroulant pas entre les parties figurant sur la facture – Absence de préjudice pour le budget de l’État.#Affaire T-363/25.

This document does not exist in English.
November 7, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62021TJ0715_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber, Extended Composition) of 2 July 2025.#Cellnex Telecom, SA and Retevisión I, SA v European Commission.#Case T-715/21.

November 7, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62024CO0215

This document does not exist in English.
November 7, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62023TJ0222_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 18 June 2025.#Arysta Lifescience v European Food Safety Authority.#Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Documents relating to the procedure for renewing the approval of the active substance captan – EFSA decision to disclose the full list of co-formulants present in the formulation for representative uses of the plant protection product Captan 80 WG referring to that substance – Exception relating to the protection of the commercial interests of a natural or legal person – Overriding public interest – Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 – Information relating to emissions into the environment.#Case T-222/23.

November 7, 2025 0 Comments

CELEX:62025CO0270(01): Order of the President of the Court of 29 October 2025.#Andrey Melnichenko v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Intervention – Second paragraph of Article 40 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union – Interest in the result of the case – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine – Freezing of the applicant’s funds and economic resources – Applicant for leave to intervene mentioned by name, as a company owned and then formerly owned by that applicant, in the statement of reasons underlying the restrictive measures adopted against it – Effect of those measures on the applicant for leave to intervene – Leave to intervene granted.#Case C-270/25 P.

November 7, 2025 0 Comments
RSS
1345678910Last